Tests – · none yet Owners 70 · 17 reviews
Goodyear OptiGrip looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Bridgestone Ecopia EP300 vs Goodyear OptiGrip — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 17 + 16 owner reviews. How we score
Ecopia EP300 is ahead, 69–64
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
68
Dry
Ecopia EP300 +860Why this score
Source Ecopia EP300 OptiGrip Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 63 (est.) Reviews found online 69 56 Ecopia EP300: 60% × 68 (est.) + 40% × 68.5 = 68
OptiGrip: 60% × 62.9 (est.) + 40% × 55.8 = 60
No road tests of dry for Ecopia EP300. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for OptiGrip. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
71
Wet
Ecopia EP300 +170Why this score
Source Ecopia EP300 OptiGrip Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 71 70 Ecopia EP300: 60% × 70.4 (est.) + 40% × 70.9 = 71
OptiGrip: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 70.2 = 70
No road tests of wet for Ecopia EP300. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for OptiGrip. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
69
Comfort
Ecopia EP300 +663Why this score
Source Ecopia EP300 OptiGrip Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 69 56 Ecopia EP300: 60% × 69 (est.) + 40% × 68.5 = 69
OptiGrip: 60% × 66.9 (est.) + 40% × 56 = 63
No road tests of comfort for Ecopia EP300 or OptiGrip. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
69
Treadwear
Ecopia EP300 +762Why this score
Source Ecopia EP300 OptiGrip Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 71 59 Ecopia EP300: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 71.2 = 69
OptiGrip: 60% × 63.6 (est.) + 40% × 59.2 = 62
No road tests of treadwear for Ecopia EP300. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for OptiGrip. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
69
Handling (owners)
Ecopia EP300 +960Why this score
Source Ecopia EP300 OptiGrip Reviews found online 69 60
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Ecopia EP300 | Goodyear OptiGrip |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 69 | 64 |
| Dry | 68 | 60 |
| Wet | 71 | 70 |
| Comfort | 69 | 63 |
| Treadwear | 69 | 62 |
| Handling (owners) | 69 | 60 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Ecopia EP300
OptiGrip
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Ecopia EP300
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and durability
- High levels of ride comfort and low road noise
- Noticeable improvements in fuel economy
Cons
- Wet weather grip can diminish significantly as the tire wears
- Soft sidewalls can result in a 'floaty' or bouncy driving feel
- Not intended for performance-oriented driving or aggressive cornering
Tire B OptiGrip
Pros
- Exceptional wet-weather grip and safety
- Consistent performance as the tread wears down
- Good overall tread life and durability
Cons
- High levels of road noise, often described as intrusive
- Mediocre dry-weather performance and feedback
- Reports of premature sidewall cracking
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Ecopia EP300 | B · Goodyear OptiGrip |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 29 | — |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 18″ | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone Ecopia EP300
Goodyear OptiGrip
Winner: Bridgestone Ecopia EP300 — better handling, dry and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score. Bridgestone Ecopia EP300 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 17 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Goodyear OptiGrip rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 16 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Bridgestone Ecopia EP300 scores 69 vs 60 on handling.
Bridgestone Ecopia EP300 scores 68 vs 60 on dry.
Bridgestone Ecopia EP300 scores 69 vs 62 on treadwear.
Bridgestone Ecopia EP300 scores 69 vs 63 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Ecopia EP300 or OptiGrip?
Which is better in the wet, Ecopia EP300 or OptiGrip?
Neither, by our numbers: 71 vs 70 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, Ecopia EP300 or OptiGrip?
Bridgestone Ecopia EP300, 68 vs 60 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Ecopia EP300 or OptiGrip?
Bridgestone Ecopia EP300, 69 vs 63 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Ecopia EP300 or OptiGrip?
Bridgestone Ecopia EP300, 69 vs 62 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology