Tests – · none yet Owners 71 · 17 reviews
Bridgestone Ecopia EP300 vs Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 19 road tests and 17 + 3,359 owner reviews. How we score
Too close to call: Ecopia EP300 and Ventus S1 evo3 are level at 70.
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 78 · 19 tests Owners 56 · 3,359 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 45 in 2019 Summer 53 Tyre Braking Shootout (wet braking)
“Tire preferences? My MK8 has a little over 18,000 miles now and the stock tires look like they’ve already gone to sh*t? Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 aren’t as good as they advertise? What do you recommend for tires?”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
69
Dry
Ventus S1 evo3 +675Why this score
Source Ecopia EP300 Ventus S1 evo3 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 18 tests ≈ 69 (est.) 86 Reviews found online 70 60 Ecopia EP300: 60% × 69 (est.) + 40% × 70.2 = 69
Ventus S1 evo3: 60% × 85.5 + 40% × 60 = 75
No road tests of dry for Ecopia EP300. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
72
Wet
Ventus S1 evo3 +981Why this score
Source Ecopia EP300 Ventus S1 evo3 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 18 tests ≈ 72 (est.) 90 Reviews found online 72 68 Ecopia EP300: 60% × 71.5 (est.) + 40% × 72.1 = 72
Ventus S1 evo3: 60% × 90.2 + 40% × 67.5 = 81
No road tests of wet for Ecopia EP300. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
68
Comfort
Ecopia EP300 +959Why this score
Source Ecopia EP300 Ventus S1 evo3 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests ≈ 69 (est.) 65 Reviews found online 68 55 Ecopia EP300: 40% × 68.9 (est.) + 60% × 67.6 = 68
Ventus S1 evo3: 40% × 64.7 + 60% × 55.4 = 59
No road tests of comfort for Ecopia EP300. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
–
Noise
No comparison73Why this score
Source Ecopia EP300 Ventus S1 evo3 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 14 tests – 77 Reviews found online – ≈ 67 (est.) Ventus S1 evo3: 60% × 77.3 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 73
No owner ratings of noise for Ventus S1 evo3. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
70
Treadwear
Ecopia EP300 +1753Why this score
Source Ecopia EP300 Ventus S1 evo3 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests ≈ 68 (est.) 61 Reviews found online 73 40 Ecopia EP300: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 72.7 = 70
Ventus S1 evo3: 60% × 60.7 + 40% × 40.4 = 53
No road tests of treadwear for Ecopia EP300. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
72
Handling (owners)
Ecopia EP300 +1458Why this score
Source Ecopia EP300 Ventus S1 evo3 Reviews found online 72 58 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison68Why this score
Source Ecopia EP300 Ventus S1 evo3 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 15 tests – 68
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Ecopia EP300 | Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 70 | 70 |
| Dry | 69 | 75 |
| Wet | 72 | 81 |
| Comfort | 68 | 59 |
| Noise | – | 73 |
| Treadwear | 70 | 53 |
| Handling (owners) | 72 | 58 |
| Efficiency | – | 68 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Ecopia EP300
Ventus S1 evo3
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Ecopia EP300
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and durability
- High levels of ride comfort and low road noise
- Noticeable improvements in fuel economy
Cons
- Wet weather grip can diminish significantly as the tire wears
- Soft sidewalls can result in a 'floaty' or bouncy driving feel
- Not intended for performance-oriented driving or aggressive cornering
Tire B Ventus S1 evo3
Pros
- Exceptional grip and confidence in wet and dry conditions
- Low road noise and high ride comfort
- Competitive pricing compared to premium tier-one brands
Cons
- Faster-than-expected tread wear, particularly on rear axles or heavy vehicles
- Soft sidewalls leading to reduced steering feedback and precision
- Vulnerability to sidewall damage or bubbling from potholes
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Bridgestone Ecopia EP300
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3
Community sentiment toward the Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 3 is mixed, with users frequently praising its strong dry and wet grip, comfort, and competitive pricing. However, notable drawbacks include relatively fast tread wear, reports of increasing road noise over time, and mixed experiences with OEM specs versus premium competitors like Michelin.
“That would tally with what this person found with the 127 variant that preceded it “Hi just for information,I asked Hankook what tread depth when new was on their Ventus S1 Evo 3 K127 tyre, the reply was 6.6 mm””
“I had Hankook tires on my XKR, and thought they were the noisiest tires I had ever heard on a car, and I had to get rid of them as I couldn't stand it.”
“Nice. I'm in Texas, so I'm not sure if those (as all seasons) would be the best choice for me. I will never drive in snow/ice, and have been leaning towards the Hankook Ventus S1 EVO3 for my Model 3 AWD with 19" wheels. Those are the only Tesla OEM (I prefer the Tesla specs like acoustic lining, tread width, extra sidewall stability, etc.) summer tires in the 19" size.”
Based on 33 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Ecopia EP300 | B · Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 29 | 110 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 18″ | 17″ – 22″ |
| Sizes in common | 5 | 5 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone Ecopia EP300
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3
Too close to call: Bridgestone Ecopia EP300 and Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 are within 2 points overall. Bridgestone Ecopia EP300 is stronger on treadwear, handling and comfort. Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 is stronger on wet and dry. Bridgestone Ecopia EP300 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 17 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Bridgestone Ecopia EP300 scores 70 vs 53 on treadwear.
Bridgestone Ecopia EP300 scores 72 vs 58 on handling.
Bridgestone Ecopia EP300 scores 68 vs 59 on comfort.
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 scores 81 vs 72 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Ecopia EP300 or Ventus S1 evo3?
Which is better in the wet, Ecopia EP300 or Ventus S1 evo3?
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3, 81 vs 72 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Ecopia EP300 or Ventus S1 evo3?
Hankook Ventus S1 evo3, 75 vs 69 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Ecopia EP300 or Ventus S1 evo3?
Bridgestone Ecopia EP300, 68 vs 59 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Ecopia EP300 or Ventus S1 evo3?
Bridgestone Ecopia EP300, 70 vs 53 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology