Tests – · none yet Owners 71 · 17 reviews
Toyo Proxes 1 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Bridgestone Ecopia EP300 vs Toyo Proxes 1 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 17 + 6 owner reviews. How we score
Ecopia EP300 is ahead, 70–61
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
69
Dry
Ecopia EP300 +564Why this score
Source Ecopia EP300 Proxes 1 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 70 62 Ecopia EP300: 60% × 68.7 (est.) + 40% × 69.8 = 69
Proxes 1: 60% × 65.7 (est.) + 40% × 62.4 = 64
No road tests of dry for Ecopia EP300. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for Proxes 1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
72
Wet
Ecopia EP300 +1062Why this score
Source Ecopia EP300 Proxes 1 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 72 58 Ecopia EP300: 60% × 71.4 (est.) + 40% × 71.9 = 72
Proxes 1: 60% × 63.9 (est.) + 40% × 58.3 = 62
No road tests of wet for Ecopia EP300. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Proxes 1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
68
Comfort
Ecopia EP300 +1256Why this score
Source Ecopia EP300 Proxes 1 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 67 51 Ecopia EP300: 40% × 68.3 (est.) + 60% × 67 = 68
Proxes 1: 40% × 65 (est.) + 60% × 50.7 = 56
No road tests of comfort for Ecopia EP300. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Proxes 1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
70
Treadwear
Ecopia EP300 +1258Why this score
Source Ecopia EP300 Proxes 1 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 61 (est.) Reviews found online 73 52 Ecopia EP300: 60% × 68.8 (est.) + 40% × 72.9 = 70
Proxes 1: 60% × 61.4 (est.) + 40% × 52.3 = 58
No road tests of treadwear for Ecopia EP300. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Proxes 1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
71
Handling (owners)
Ecopia EP300 +1754Why this score
Source Ecopia EP300 Proxes 1 Reviews found online 71 54
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Ecopia EP300 | Toyo Proxes 1 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 70 | 61 |
| Dry | 69 | 64 |
| Wet | 72 | 62 |
| Comfort | 68 | 56 |
| Treadwear | 70 | 58 |
| Handling (owners) | 71 | 54 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Ecopia EP300
Proxes 1
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Ecopia EP300
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and durability
- High levels of ride comfort and low road noise
- Noticeable improvements in fuel economy
Cons
- Wet weather grip can diminish significantly as the tire wears
- Soft sidewalls can result in a 'floaty' or bouncy driving feel
- Not intended for performance-oriented driving or aggressive cornering
Tire B Proxes 1
Pros
- Exceptional dry and wet weather grip
- Improved steering feedback and handling characteristics
- Competitive price point
Cons
- Extremely rapid tread wear, particularly under high-torque conditions
- Poor rolling resistance
- Uneven tread wear patterns, specifically premature shoulder degradation
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Ecopia EP300 | B · Toyo Proxes 1 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 29 | — |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 18″ | — |
| UTQG | — | 240 AA A |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone Ecopia EP300
Toyo Proxes 1
Winner: Bridgestone Ecopia EP300 — better handling, comfort and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score. Bridgestone Ecopia EP300 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 17 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Toyo Proxes 1 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 6 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Bridgestone Ecopia EP300 scores 71 vs 54 on handling.
Bridgestone Ecopia EP300 scores 68 vs 56 on comfort.
Bridgestone Ecopia EP300 scores 70 vs 58 on treadwear.
Bridgestone Ecopia EP300 scores 72 vs 62 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Ecopia EP300 or Proxes 1?
Which is better in the wet, Ecopia EP300 or Proxes 1?
Bridgestone Ecopia EP300, 72 vs 62 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Ecopia EP300 or Proxes 1?
Bridgestone Ecopia EP300, 69 vs 64 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Ecopia EP300 or Proxes 1?
Bridgestone Ecopia EP300, 68 vs 56 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Ecopia EP300 or Proxes 1?
Bridgestone Ecopia EP300, 70 vs 58 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology