Tests – · none yet Owners 48 · 15 reviews
Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 vs Firestone Firehawk AS — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Firehawk AS is ahead, 64–54
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 63 · 8 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
52
Dry
Firehawk AS +1365Why this score
Source Ecopia EP422 Firehawk AS Reviews found online 44 64 -
56
Wet
Firehawk AS +965Why this score
Source Ecopia EP422 Firehawk AS Reviews found online 51 64 -
56
Snow
Firehawk AS +662Why this score
Source Ecopia EP422 Firehawk AS Reviews found online 46 56 -
57
Comfort
Firehawk AS +865Why this score
Source Ecopia EP422 Firehawk AS Reviews found online 44 61 -
62
Noise
Firehawk AS +466Why this score
Source Ecopia EP422 Firehawk AS Reviews found online 54 66 -
58
Treadwear
Firehawk AS +866Why this score
Source Ecopia EP422 Firehawk AS Reviews found online 52 66 -
43
Handling
Firehawk AS +1861Why this score
Source Ecopia EP422 Firehawk AS Reviews found online 43 61
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 | Firestone Firehawk AS |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 54 | 64 |
| Dry | 52 | 65 |
| Wet | 56 | 65 |
| Snow | 56 | 62 |
| Comfort | 57 | 65 |
| Noise | 62 | 66 |
| Treadwear | 58 | 66 |
| Handling | 43 | 61 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Ecopia EP422
Firehawk AS
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Ecopia EP422
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Tire B Firehawk AS
Pros
- Exceptionally quiet and smooth ride quality
- Strong dry handling and improved cornering response
- Good water dispersion and wet road performance for most users
Cons
- Potential susceptibility to hydroplaning in heavy rain according to select reviewers
- Requires proper balancing to prevent irregular tread wear
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Ecopia EP422 | B · Firestone Firehawk AS |
|---|---|---|
| Category | — | All Season High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 6 | 4 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 17″ | 15″ – 18″ |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | 11/32″ |
| UTQG | 480 A A | 480 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | 65,000 mi | 50,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | 44 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone Ecopia EP422
Firestone Firehawk AS
Winner: Firestone Firehawk AS — better handling, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Firestone Firehawk AS scores 61 vs 43 on handling.
Firestone Firehawk AS scores 65 vs 52 on dry.
Firestone Firehawk AS scores 65 vs 56 on wet.
Firestone Firehawk AS scores 65 vs 57 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.