Tests – · none yet Owners 72 · 24 reviews
Bridgestone Potenza Adrenalin RE004 vs Toyo Proxes CF1 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 24 + 46 owner reviews. How we score
Potenza Adrenalin RE004 leads, 72–69 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 68 · 46 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
73
Dry
Potenza Adrenalin RE004 +469Why this score
Source Potenza Adrenalin RE004 Proxes CF1 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 76 70 Potenza Adrenalin RE004: 60% × 71.1 (est.) + 40% × 76.2 = 73
Proxes CF1: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 70 = 69
No road tests of dry for Potenza Adrenalin RE004. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for Proxes CF1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
72
Wet
Level72Why this score
Source Potenza Adrenalin RE004 Proxes CF1 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 72 (est.) ≈ 71 (est.) Reviews found online 73 72 Potenza Adrenalin RE004: 60% × 71.7 (est.) + 40% × 73.2 = 72
Proxes CF1: 60% × 71.1 (est.) + 40% × 72.2 = 72
No road tests of wet for Potenza Adrenalin RE004. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for Proxes CF1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
70
Comfort
Potenza Adrenalin RE004 +169Why this score
Source Potenza Adrenalin RE004 Proxes CF1 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 70 69 Potenza Adrenalin RE004: 60% × 69.3 (est.) + 40% × 70.2 = 70
Proxes CF1: 60% × 69 (est.) + 40% × 68.5 = 69
No road tests of comfort for Potenza Adrenalin RE004 or Proxes CF1. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
66
Treadwear
Potenza Adrenalin RE004 +462Why this score
Source Potenza Adrenalin RE004 Proxes CF1 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 66 60 Potenza Adrenalin RE004: 60% × 65.9 (est.) + 40% × 66.4 = 66
Proxes CF1: 60% × 63.8 (est.) + 40% × 59.7 = 62
No road tests of treadwear for Potenza Adrenalin RE004. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for Proxes CF1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
78
Handling (owners)
Potenza Adrenalin RE004 +969Why this score
Source Potenza Adrenalin RE004 Proxes CF1 Reviews found online 78 69
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Potenza Adrenalin RE004 | Toyo Proxes CF1 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 72 | 69 |
| Dry | 73 | 69 |
| Wet | 72 | 72 |
| Comfort | 70 | 69 |
| Treadwear | 66 | 62 |
| Handling (owners) | 78 | 69 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Potenza Adrenalin RE004
Proxes CF1
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Potenza Adrenalin RE004
Pros
- Exceptional steering precision and turn-in response due to a stiff sidewall construction.
- Strong dry-weather grip and stability during high-speed cornering.
- Significant improvement in wet-weather performance compared to the previous RE003 generation.
Cons
- Inconsistent reports on road noise, with some users finding it intrusive at highway speeds.
- Polarized feedback on tread life, with some users reporting rapid wear under aggressive driving.
- Stiffer sidewall can lead to a harsher ride quality on poor road surfaces for some vehicles.
Tire B Proxes CF1
Pros
- Exceptional dry and wet grip for the price point
- High levels of ride comfort and low road noise
- Predictable handling and responsive steering feedback
Cons
- Rapid tread wear and short lifespan
- Performance degradation as the tread depth decreases
- Potential for handling instability if mixed with non-directional tires
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Potenza Adrenalin RE004 | B · Toyo Proxes CF1 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone Potenza Adrenalin RE004
Toyo Proxes CF1
Narrow edge: Bridgestone Potenza Adrenalin RE004 — better handling, dry and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Bridgestone Potenza Adrenalin RE004 scores 78 vs 69 on handling.
Bridgestone Potenza Adrenalin RE004 scores 73 vs 69 on dry.
Bridgestone Potenza Adrenalin RE004 scores 66 vs 62 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Potenza Adrenalin RE004 or Proxes CF1?
Which is better in the wet, Potenza Adrenalin RE004 or Proxes CF1?
Neither, by our numbers: 72 vs 72 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, Potenza Adrenalin RE004 or Proxes CF1?
Bridgestone Potenza Adrenalin RE004, 73 vs 69 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Potenza Adrenalin RE004 or Proxes CF1?
Neither, by our numbers: 70 vs 69 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, Potenza Adrenalin RE004 or Proxes CF1?
Bridgestone Potenza Adrenalin RE004, 66 vs 62 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology