Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone Potenza Adrenalin RE004 vs Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 24 + 31 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: Potenza Adrenalin RE004 72, Advan Neova AD08 71.

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 73

    Dry

    Advan Neova AD08 +2
    75
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza Adrenalin RE004Advan Neova AD08
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 73 (est.)
    Reviews found online7680

    Potenza Adrenalin RE004: 60% × 71.1 (est.) + 40% × 76.2 = 73

    Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 72.5 (est.) + 40% × 79.7 = 75

    No road tests of dry for Potenza Adrenalin RE004. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 72

    Wet

    Potenza Adrenalin RE004 +3
    69
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza Adrenalin RE004Advan Neova AD08
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 72 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online7369

    Potenza Adrenalin RE004: 60% × 71.7 (est.) + 40% × 73.2 = 72

    Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 69.1 (est.) + 40% × 68.5 = 69

    No road tests of wet for Potenza Adrenalin RE004. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    65
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza Adrenalin RE004Advan Neova AD08
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online–61

    Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 67 (est.) + 40% × 61.3 = 65

    No road tests of snow for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 70

    Comfort

    Potenza Adrenalin RE004 +2
    68
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza Adrenalin RE004Advan Neova AD08
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online7067

    Potenza Adrenalin RE004: 60% × 69.3 (est.) + 40% × 70.2 = 70

    Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 68.7 (est.) + 40% × 66.6 = 68

    No road tests of comfort for Potenza Adrenalin RE004 or Advan Neova AD08. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    67
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza Adrenalin RE004Advan Neova AD08
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online–68

    Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 67.8 = 67

    No road tests of noise for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 66

    Treadwear

    Potenza Adrenalin RE004 +3
    63
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza Adrenalin RE004Advan Neova AD08
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online6661

    Potenza Adrenalin RE004: 60% × 65.9 (est.) + 40% × 66.4 = 66

    Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 64.3 (est.) + 40% × 61.2 = 63

    No road tests of treadwear for Potenza Adrenalin RE004. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 78

    Handling (owners)

    Advan Neova AD08 +1
    79
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza Adrenalin RE004Advan Neova AD08
    Reviews found online7879
Scores at a glance
Bridgestone Potenza Adrenalin RE004 vs Yokohama Advan Neova AD08: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBridgestone Potenza Adrenalin RE004Yokohama Advan Neova AD08
Relative Score 72 71
Dry 73 75
Wet 72 69
Snow – 65
Comfort 70 68
Noise – 67
Treadwear 66 63
Handling (owners) 78 79

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Potenza Adrenalin RE004

Advan Neova AD08

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Potenza Adrenalin RE004

Pros

  • Exceptional steering precision and turn-in response due to a stiff sidewall construction.
  • Strong dry-weather grip and stability during high-speed cornering.
  • Significant improvement in wet-weather performance compared to the previous RE003 generation.

Cons

  • Inconsistent reports on road noise, with some users finding it intrusive at highway speeds.
  • Polarized feedback on tread life, with some users reporting rapid wear under aggressive driving.
  • Stiffer sidewall can lead to a harsher ride quality on poor road surfaces for some vehicles.
All owner themes in the Potenza Adrenalin RE004 review

Tire B Advan Neova AD08

Pros

  • Phenomenal dry grip and cornering traction
  • Exceptional steering feedback and crisp response
  • Stiff, robust sidewall and carcass construction

Cons

  • Prone to overheating and rubber degradation/chunking during heavy track use
  • Reduced performance and aquaplaning tendencies in heavy standing water
  • Limited size availability for larger rims
All owner themes in the Advan Neova AD08 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Potenza Adrenalin RE004 B · Yokohama Advan Neova AD08
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Tread depth—9/32″
UTQG—180 A A
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—51 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone Potenza Adrenalin RE004

Yokohama Advan Neova AD08

Too close to call: Bridgestone Potenza Adrenalin RE004 and Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 are within 2 points overall. Bridgestone Potenza Adrenalin RE004 is stronger on wet and treadwear.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Bridgestone Potenza Adrenalin RE004 scores 72 vs 69 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Bridgestone Potenza Adrenalin RE004 scores 66 vs 63 on treadwear.

Tire A · Bridgestone Potenza Adrenalin RE004
Tire B · Yokohama Advan Neova AD08

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Potenza Adrenalin RE004 or Advan Neova AD08?

Which is better in the wet, Potenza Adrenalin RE004 or Advan Neova AD08?

Bridgestone Potenza Adrenalin RE004, 72 vs 69 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Potenza Adrenalin RE004 or Advan Neova AD08?

Neither, by our numbers: 73 vs 75 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, Potenza Adrenalin RE004 or Advan Neova AD08?

Neither, by our numbers: 70 vs 68 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, Potenza Adrenalin RE004 or Advan Neova AD08?

Bridgestone Potenza Adrenalin RE004, 66 vs 63 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology