Tests 75 · 1 test Owners 68 · 12 reviews
Bridgestone Potenza Race vs Nexen N'Fera SUR4G — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 1 road tests and 12 + 6 owner reviews. How we score
Potenza Race is ahead, 71–62
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 68 · 1 test Owners 56 · 6 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
77
Dry
Potenza Race +1463Why this score
Source Potenza Race N'Fera SUR4G Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 1 tests 76 61 Reviews found online 80 67 Potenza Race: 60% × 75.5 + 40% × 79.7 = 77
N'Fera SUR4G: 60% × 60.6 + 40% × 67 = 63
-
73
Wet
Potenza Race +370Why this score
Source Potenza Race N'Fera SUR4G Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 1 tests 75 75 Reviews found online 71 64 Potenza Race: 60% × 74.9 + 40% × 70.8 = 73
N'Fera SUR4G: 60% × 74.9 + 40% × 63.5 = 70
-
–
Snow
No comparison60Why this score
Source Potenza Race N'Fera SUR4G Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online – 53 N'Fera SUR4G: 60% × 64.9 (est.) + 40% × 52.9 = 60
No road tests of snow for N'Fera SUR4G. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
65
Comfort
Potenza Race +1154Why this score
Source Potenza Race N'Fera SUR4G Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 64 47 Potenza Race: 40% × 67.6 (est.) + 60% × 63.6 = 65
N'Fera SUR4G: 40% × 64.3 (est.) + 60% × 46.9 = 54
No road tests of comfort for Potenza Race or N'Fera SUR4G. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
–
Noise
No comparison65Why this score
Source Potenza Race N'Fera SUR4G Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online – 63 N'Fera SUR4G: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 62.7 = 65
No road tests of noise for N'Fera SUR4G. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
57
Treadwear
Potenza Race +948Why this score
Source Potenza Race N'Fera SUR4G Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 61 (est.) ≈ 56 (est.) Reviews found online 50 36 Potenza Race: 60% × 60.7 (est.) + 40% × 50.4 = 57
N'Fera SUR4G: 60% × 55.6 (est.) + 40% × 36.4 = 48
No road tests of treadwear for Potenza Race. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for N'Fera SUR4G. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
80
Handling (owners)
Potenza Race +1763Why this score
Source Potenza Race N'Fera SUR4G Reviews found online 80 63
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Potenza Race | Nexen N'Fera SUR4G |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 71 | 62 |
| Dry | 77 | 63 |
| Wet | 73 | 70 |
| Snow | – | 60 |
| Comfort | 65 | 54 |
| Noise | – | 65 |
| Treadwear | 57 | 48 |
| Handling (owners) | 80 | 63 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Potenza Race
N'Fera SUR4G
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | Potenza Race | N'Fera SUR4G | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 98% #2/4 · 2022 Track Day Tyre Test | 94% #3/3 · 2025 AutoView Extreme Performance Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 100% #2/4 · 2022 Track Day Tyre Test | 99% #3/3 · 2025 AutoView Extreme Performance Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 91% #2/4 · 2022 Track Day Tyre Test | 96% #2/3 · 2025 AutoView Extreme Performance Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #1/4 2022 Track Day Tyre Test | #3/3 2025 AutoView Extreme Performance Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Potenza Race
Pros
- Phenomenal dry grip and cornering performance that rivals or beats direct competitors like Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2
- Surprisingly good wet weather traction and safety for a track-focused compound
- Precise steering response, hard sidewalls, and excellent road feedback
Cons
- Extremely fast tread wear and short lifespan under track or aggressive driving conditions
- Tendency to pick up stones during street driving
- Steering feel can initially start out slightly numb until the tire is pushed harder
Tire B N'Fera SUR4G
Pros
- Insane level of grip on both dry and wet surfaces
- Exceptional performance in unexpected rain conditions during track events
- Competitive pricing compared to alternatives like the RS4
Cons
- Rapid tread wear and short overall tire lifespan
- Requires careful driving speeds in heavy rain after a certain threshold
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Potenza Race | B · Nexen N'Fera SUR4G |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 18 | 1 |
| Rim diameters | 17″ – 22″ | 20″ |
| Tread depth | 7/32″ | 8/32″ |
| UTQG | 200 A A | 200 A A |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 50 psi | 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone Potenza Race
Nexen N'Fera SUR4G
Winner: Bridgestone Potenza Race — better handling, dry and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score. Bridgestone Potenza Race rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 12 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Nexen N'Fera SUR4G rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 6 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Bridgestone Potenza Race scores 80 vs 63 on handling.
Bridgestone Potenza Race scores 77 vs 63 on dry.
Bridgestone Potenza Race scores 65 vs 54 on comfort.
Bridgestone Potenza Race scores 57 vs 48 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Potenza Race or N'Fera SUR4G?
Which is better in the wet, Potenza Race or N'Fera SUR4G?
Bridgestone Potenza Race, 73 vs 70 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Potenza Race or N'Fera SUR4G?
Bridgestone Potenza Race, 77 vs 63 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Potenza Race or N'Fera SUR4G?
Bridgestone Potenza Race, 65 vs 54 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Potenza Race or N'Fera SUR4G?
Bridgestone Potenza Race, 57 vs 48 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology