tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone Potenza RE001 vs Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 19 road tests and 42 + 3,376 owner reviews. How we score

Ventus S1 evo3 leads, 70–66 Narrow edge

Check price on Amazon · Ventus S1 evo3 or Potenza RE001 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Hankook Ventus S1 evo3
Tire BHankook

Ventus S1 evo3

Summer

± 5

Tests 77 · 19 tests Owners 57 · 3,376 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 45 in 2019 Summer 53 Tyre Braking Shootout (wet braking)

“Tire preferences? My MK8 has a little over 18,000 miles now and the stock tires look like they’ve already gone to sh*t? Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 aren’t as good as they advertise? What do you recommend for tires?”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 69

    Dry

    Ventus S1 evo3 +6
    75
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE001Ventus S1 evo3
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 18 tests≈ 69 (est.)86
    Reviews found online6960

    Potenza RE001: 60% × 68.5 (est.) + 40% × 69.4 = 69

    Ventus S1 evo3: 60% × 85.6 + 40% × 59.8 = 75

    No road tests of dry for Potenza RE001. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 67

    Wet

    Ventus S1 evo3 +14
    81
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE001Ventus S1 evo3
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 18 tests≈ 68 (est.)90
    Reviews found online6568

    Potenza RE001: 60% × 67.8 (est.) + 40% × 65.4 = 67

    Ventus S1 evo3: 60% × 89.6 + 40% × 68 = 81

    No road tests of wet for Potenza RE001. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 58

    Comfort

    Ventus S1 evo3 +1
    59
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE001Ventus S1 evo3
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests≈ 66 (est.)64
    Reviews found online5356

    Potenza RE001: 40% × 65.6 (est.) + 60% × 53.3 = 58

    Ventus S1 evo3: 40% × 64.4 + 60% × 55.8 = 59

    No road tests of comfort for Potenza RE001. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  4. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    73
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE001Ventus S1 evo3
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 14 tests–77
    Reviews found online–≈ 66 (est.)

    Ventus S1 evo3: 60% × 76.9 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 73

    No owner ratings of noise for Ventus S1 evo3. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  5. 61

    Treadwear

    Potenza RE001 +8
    53
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE001Ventus S1 evo3
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests≈ 63 (est.)61
    Reviews found online5742

    Potenza RE001: 60% × 63.2 (est.) + 40% × 57.4 = 61

    Ventus S1 evo3: 60% × 60.8 + 40% × 41.5 = 53

    No road tests of treadwear for Potenza RE001. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  6. 68

    Handling (owners)

    Potenza RE001 +9
    59
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE001Ventus S1 evo3
    Reviews found online6859
  7. –

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    68
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE001Ventus S1 evo3
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 15 tests–68
Scores at a glance
CategoryBridgestone Potenza RE001Hankook Ventus S1 evo3
Relative Score 66 70
Dry 69 75
Wet 67 81
Comfort 58 59
Noise – 73
Treadwear 61 53
Handling (owners) 68 59
Efficiency – 68

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Potenza RE001

± 5

Ventus S1 evo3

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Potenza RE001

Pros

  • Exceptional dry grip and steering feedback
  • High value-for-money proposition
  • Progressive handling characteristics

Cons

  • High levels of road noise on coarse surfaces
  • Stiff, harsh ride quality
  • Inconsistent wet-weather performance
All owner themes in the Potenza RE001 review

Tire B Ventus S1 evo3

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and confidence in wet and dry conditions
  • Low road noise and high ride comfort
  • Competitive pricing compared to premium tier-one brands

Cons

  • Faster-than-expected tread wear, particularly on rear axles or heavy vehicles
  • Soft sidewalls leading to reduced steering feedback and precision
  • Vulnerability to sidewall damage or bubbling from potholes
All owner themes in the Ventus S1 evo3 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Bridgestone Potenza RE001

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Hankook Ventus S1 evo3

Mixed

Community sentiment toward the Hankook Ventus S1 Evo 3 is mixed, with users frequently praising its strong dry and wet grip, comfort, and competitive pricing. However, notable drawbacks include relatively fast tread wear, reports of increasing road noise over time, and mixed experiences with OEM specs versus premium competitors like Michelin.

jaguarforums.com

“I had Hankook tires on my XKR, and thought they were the noisiest tires I had ever heard on a car, and I had to get rid of them as I couldn't stand it.”
insideevsforum.com ·2022-12-19

“So, I was conversing on a Canadian EV group on Facebook and someone said their SE arrived with run flats…Hankook Ventus S1 evo3. My Mini also has Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 and I was not aware they are considered run flats. So I looked them up online and it appears that in 205/45R17 XL it says Run Flat…Y on . Was anyone else aware of this? Should it say run flat somewhere on the tire?”
r/TyreReviews ·7 upvotes ·2026-01-11

“Which tire should I choose? I’m currently looking for new summer tires, but this time I’m finding it surprisingly difficult to choose. My previous set were Bridgestone T005s, which honestly didn’t impress me much. On my earlier car I’ve driven on Michelin PS4S, Hankook Ventus S1 evo 3, and Pirelli (don’t remember the exact model). The Michelins were by far my favorite — excellent grip and overall a fantastic tire. The Hankooks were above average and perfectly fine, but the Pirellis were a big disappointment. This time I’m considering the following three options: • Michelin Pilot Sport 5 • Continental SportContact 7 • Kumho Ecsta Sport S PS72 If I hadn’t done any research, I would have gone for the Michelins without hesitation. However, after digging a bit deeper, I added the Continentals as a strong competitor, and the Kumhos because they’re significantly cheaper while still getting quite positive reviews. I drive a Cupra Formentor 2.0 AWD with around 430 hp. I never take the car to the track, but I do enjoy sporty driving and quick launches at traffic lights. Now I’m finding the final decision harder than expected. Taking both price and performance into account, which of these three would you recommend? Read more”
Top themes
#Wet and dry grip#Value for money#Road noise levels#Tread wear and longevity#OEM fitments and EV variants#Run-flat identification confusion#Ride comfort

Based on 33 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Potenza RE001 B · Hankook Ventus S1 evo3
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available—110
Rim diameters—17″ – 22″
UTQG—200 - 420 A - AA A

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone Potenza RE001

Hankook Ventus S1 evo3

Narrow edge: Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 — better wet and dry. Pick the Bridgestone Potenza RE001 if handling and treadwear matter most to you.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 scores 81 vs 67 on wet.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Bridgestone Potenza RE001 scores 68 vs 59 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Bridgestone Potenza RE001 scores 61 vs 53 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Hankook Ventus S1 evo3 scores 75 vs 69 on dry.

Tire A · Bridgestone Potenza RE001
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Hankook Ventus S1 evo3
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Potenza RE001 or Ventus S1 evo3?

Which is better in the wet, Potenza RE001 or Ventus S1 evo3?

Hankook Ventus S1 evo3, 81 vs 67 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Potenza RE001 or Ventus S1 evo3?

Hankook Ventus S1 evo3, 75 vs 69 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Potenza RE001 or Ventus S1 evo3?

Neither, by our numbers: 58 vs 59 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, Potenza RE001 or Ventus S1 evo3?

Bridgestone Potenza RE001, 61 vs 53 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology