tirewheelguide

Bridgestone Potenza RE01R looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone Potenza RE01R vs Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 4 + 31 owner reviews. How we score

Advan Neova AD08 leads, 71–68 Narrow edge

Check price on Amazon · Advan Neova AD08 or Potenza RE01R on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Bridgestone Potenza RE01R
Tire ABridgestone

Potenza RE01R

Summer Extreme Performance tires

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 67 · 4 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 70

    Dry

    Advan Neova AD08 +5
    75
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE01RAdvan Neova AD08
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 73 (est.)
    Reviews found online7180

    Potenza RE01R: 60% × 68.8 (est.) + 40% × 70.5 = 70

    Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 72.5 (est.) + 40% × 79.7 = 75

    No road tests of dry for Potenza RE01R. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 71

    Wet

    Potenza RE01R +2
    69
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE01RAdvan Neova AD08
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online7269

    Potenza RE01R: 60% × 71 (est.) + 40% × 72 = 71

    Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 69.1 (est.) + 40% × 68.5 = 69

    No road tests of wet for Potenza RE01R. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    65
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE01RAdvan Neova AD08
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online–61

    Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 67 (est.) + 40% × 61.3 = 65

    No road tests of snow for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 63

    Comfort

    Advan Neova AD08 +5
    68
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE01RAdvan Neova AD08
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online5867

    Potenza RE01R: 60% × 67.2 (est.) + 40% × 57.8 = 63

    Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 68.7 (est.) + 40% × 66.6 = 68

    No road tests of comfort for Potenza RE01R or Advan Neova AD08. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    67
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE01RAdvan Neova AD08
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online–68

    Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 67.8 = 67

    No road tests of noise for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 64

    Treadwear

    Potenza RE01R +1
    63
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE01RAdvan Neova AD08
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online6261

    Potenza RE01R: 60% × 64.6 (est.) + 40% × 62.4 = 64

    Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 64.3 (est.) + 40% × 61.2 = 63

    No road tests of treadwear for Potenza RE01R. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 68

    Handling (owners)

    Advan Neova AD08 +11
    79
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE01RAdvan Neova AD08
    Reviews found online6879
Scores at a glance
CategoryBridgestone Potenza RE01RYokohama Advan Neova AD08
Relative Score 68 71
Dry 70 75
Wet 71 69
Snow – 65
Comfort 63 68
Noise – 67
Treadwear 64 63
Handling (owners) 68 79

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Potenza RE01R

Advan Neova AD08

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Potenza RE01R

Pros

  • Exceptional dry grip and handling characteristics
  • Predictable and communicative breakaway behavior
  • High durability and heat resistance during track sessions

Cons

  • High price point compared to competitors
  • Limited market availability and difficulty in sourcing
  • Performance may be surpassed by dedicated R-compound tires for pure track use
All owner themes in the Potenza RE01R review

Tire B Advan Neova AD08

Pros

  • Phenomenal dry grip and cornering traction
  • Exceptional steering feedback and crisp response
  • Stiff, robust sidewall and carcass construction

Cons

  • Prone to overheating and rubber degradation/chunking during heavy track use
  • Reduced performance and aquaplaning tendencies in heavy standing water
  • Limited size availability for larger rims
All owner themes in the Advan Neova AD08 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Potenza RE01R B · Yokohama Advan Neova AD08
CategorySummer Extreme Performance tiresSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Tread depth—9/32″
UTQG—180 A A
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—51 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone Potenza RE01R

Yokohama Advan Neova AD08

Narrow edge: Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 — better handling, dry and comfort. Where the Bridgestone Potenza RE01R is ahead, it is by less than 3 points. Bridgestone Potenza RE01R rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 4 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 scores 79 vs 68 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 scores 75 vs 70 on dry.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 scores 68 vs 63 on comfort.

Tire A · Bridgestone Potenza RE01R
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Yokohama Advan Neova AD08
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Potenza RE01R or Advan Neova AD08?

Which is better in the wet, Potenza RE01R or Advan Neova AD08?

Neither, by our numbers: 71 vs 69 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, Potenza RE01R or Advan Neova AD08?

Yokohama Advan Neova AD08, 75 vs 70 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Potenza RE01R or Advan Neova AD08?

Yokohama Advan Neova AD08, 68 vs 63 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Potenza RE01R or Advan Neova AD08?

Neither, by our numbers: 64 vs 63 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology