Tests – · none yet Owners 56 · 8 reviews
Bridgestone Potenza RE030 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Bridgestone Potenza RE030 vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Sport — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 8 + 17 owner reviews. How we score
Eagle F1 Sport is ahead, 73–58
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 74 · 17 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
59
Dry
Eagle F1 Sport +1574Why this score
Source Potenza RE030 Eagle F1 Sport Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 63 (est.) ≈ 71 (est.) Reviews found online 55 77 Potenza RE030: 60% × 62.5 (est.) + 40% × 54.8 = 59
Eagle F1 Sport: 60% × 71.5 (est.) + 40% × 77 = 74
No road tests of dry for Potenza RE030. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for Eagle F1 Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
56
Wet
Eagle F1 Sport +1975Why this score
Source Potenza RE030 Eagle F1 Sport Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 59 (est.) ≈ 74 (est.) Reviews found online 51 77 Potenza RE030: 60% × 59.5 (est.) + 40% × 51.4 = 56
Eagle F1 Sport: 60% × 74.1 (est.) + 40% × 77.4 = 75
No road tests of wet for Potenza RE030. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for Eagle F1 Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
56
Comfort
Eagle F1 Sport +1470Why this score
Source Potenza RE030 Eagle F1 Sport Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 43 72 Potenza RE030: 60% × 64.6 (est.) + 40% × 43.1 = 56
Eagle F1 Sport: 60% × 69.6 (est.) + 40% × 71.6 = 70
No road tests of comfort for Potenza RE030 or Eagle F1 Sport. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
67
Treadwear
Potenza RE030 +166Why this score
Source Potenza RE030 Eagle F1 Sport Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 69 66 Potenza RE030: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 68.7 = 67
Eagle F1 Sport: 60% × 65.7 (est.) + 40% × 65.8 = 66
No road tests of treadwear for Potenza RE030. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for Eagle F1 Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
49
Handling (owners)
Eagle F1 Sport +2877Why this score
Source Potenza RE030 Eagle F1 Sport Reviews found online 49 77
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Potenza RE030 | Goodyear Eagle F1 Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 58 | 73 |
| Dry | 59 | 74 |
| Wet | 56 | 75 |
| Comfort | 56 | 70 |
| Treadwear | 67 | 66 |
| Handling (owners) | 49 | 77 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Potenza RE030
Eagle F1 Sport
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Potenza RE030
Pros
- Exceptional tread longevity and durability
- Reliable and consistent dry road grip
- Strong, stiff sidewall construction
Cons
- High levels of cabin road noise
- Poor traction and handling in wet conditions
- Tendency toward understeer
Tire B Eagle F1 Sport
Pros
- Exceptional dry and wet grip with high cornering confidence
- High level of comfort and plush ride quality for a sporty tire
- Sharp steering response and improved handling
Cons
- Potential for aquaplaning in heavy downpours
- Some reports of rapid outer tread wear or durability issues under harsh driving
- Softer sidewalls can sometimes reduce direct steering feedback
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Potenza RE030 | B · Goodyear Eagle F1 Sport |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone Potenza RE030
Goodyear Eagle F1 Sport
Winner: Goodyear Eagle F1 Sport — better handling, wet and dry. Where the Bridgestone Potenza RE030 is ahead, it is by less than 3 points. Bridgestone Potenza RE030 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 8 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Goodyear Eagle F1 Sport rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 17 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Sport scores 77 vs 49 on handling.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Sport scores 75 vs 56 on wet.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Sport scores 74 vs 59 on dry.
Goodyear Eagle F1 Sport scores 70 vs 56 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Potenza RE030 or Eagle F1 Sport?
Which is better in the wet, Potenza RE030 or Eagle F1 Sport?
Goodyear Eagle F1 Sport, 75 vs 56 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Potenza RE030 or Eagle F1 Sport?
Goodyear Eagle F1 Sport, 74 vs 59 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Potenza RE030 or Eagle F1 Sport?
Goodyear Eagle F1 Sport, 70 vs 56 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Potenza RE030 or Eagle F1 Sport?
Neither, by our numbers: 67 vs 66 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology