Tests – · none yet Owners 56 · 8 reviews
Bridgestone Potenza RE030 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Bridgestone Potenza RE030 vs Michelin Pilot Sport 3 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 8 + 10 owner reviews. How we score
Pilot Sport 3 is ahead, 67–58
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 66 · 10 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
59
Dry
Pilot Sport 3 +1170Why this score
Source Potenza RE030 Pilot Sport 3 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 63 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 55 72 Potenza RE030: 60% × 62.5 (est.) + 40% × 54.8 = 59
Pilot Sport 3: 60% × 69.3 (est.) + 40% × 71.7 = 70
No road tests of dry for Potenza RE030. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for Pilot Sport 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
56
Wet
Pilot Sport 3 +1470Why this score
Source Potenza RE030 Pilot Sport 3 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 59 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 51 70 Potenza RE030: 60% × 59.5 (est.) + 40% × 51.4 = 56
Pilot Sport 3: 60% × 70.1 (est.) + 40% × 70.4 = 70
No road tests of wet for Potenza RE030. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for Pilot Sport 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
56
Comfort
Pilot Sport 3 +965Why this score
Source Potenza RE030 Pilot Sport 3 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 43 61 Potenza RE030: 60% × 64.6 (est.) + 40% × 43.1 = 56
Pilot Sport 3: 60% × 67.8 (est.) + 40% × 61.4 = 65
No road tests of comfort for Potenza RE030 or Pilot Sport 3. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
–
Noise
No comparison66Why this score
Source Potenza RE030 Pilot Sport 3 Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online – 63 Pilot Sport 3: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 63 = 66
No road tests of noise for Pilot Sport 3. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
67
Treadwear
Potenza RE030 +661Why this score
Source Potenza RE030 Pilot Sport 3 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 63 (est.) Reviews found online 69 58 Potenza RE030: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 68.7 = 67
Pilot Sport 3: 60% × 63.2 (est.) + 40% × 57.6 = 61
No road tests of treadwear for Potenza RE030. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for Pilot Sport 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
49
Handling (owners)
Pilot Sport 3 +1665Why this score
Source Potenza RE030 Pilot Sport 3 Reviews found online 49 65
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Potenza RE030 | Michelin Pilot Sport 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 58 | 67 |
| Dry | 59 | 70 |
| Wet | 56 | 70 |
| Comfort | 56 | 65 |
| Noise | – | 66 |
| Treadwear | 67 | 61 |
| Handling (owners) | 49 | 65 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Potenza RE030
Pilot Sport 3
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Potenza RE030
Pros
- Exceptional tread longevity and durability
- Reliable and consistent dry road grip
- Strong, stiff sidewall construction
Cons
- High levels of cabin road noise
- Poor traction and handling in wet conditions
- Tendency toward understeer
Tire B Pilot Sport 3
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Potenza RE030 | B · Michelin Pilot Sport 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer tire |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 10 |
| Rim diameters | — | 15″ – 19″ |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone Potenza RE030
Michelin Pilot Sport 3
Winner: Michelin Pilot Sport 3 — better handling, wet and dry. Pick the Bridgestone Potenza RE030 if treadwear matters most to you. Bridgestone Potenza RE030 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 8 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Michelin Pilot Sport 3 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 10 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Michelin Pilot Sport 3 scores 65 vs 49 on handling.
Michelin Pilot Sport 3 scores 70 vs 56 on wet.
Michelin Pilot Sport 3 scores 70 vs 59 on dry.
Michelin Pilot Sport 3 scores 65 vs 56 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Potenza RE030 or Pilot Sport 3?
Which is better in the wet, Potenza RE030 or Pilot Sport 3?
Michelin Pilot Sport 3, 70 vs 56 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Potenza RE030 or Pilot Sport 3?
Michelin Pilot Sport 3, 70 vs 59 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Potenza RE030 or Pilot Sport 3?
Michelin Pilot Sport 3, 65 vs 56 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Potenza RE030 or Pilot Sport 3?
Bridgestone Potenza RE030, 67 vs 61 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology