tirewheelguide

Bridgestone Potenza RE030 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone Potenza RE030 vs Nexen N Fera SU1 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 3 road tests and 8 + 164 owner reviews. How we score

N Fera SU1 is ahead, 63–58

Check price on Amazon · N Fera SU1 or Potenza RE030 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Nexen N Fera SU1
Tire BNexen

N Fera SU1

Summer

Tests 63 · 3 tests Owners 63 · 164 reviews

Best test result: #6 of 22 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires (tested tread life (miles))

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 59

    Dry

    Level
    59
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE030N Fera SU1
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests≈ 63 (est.)55
    Reviews found online5565

    Potenza RE030: 60% × 62.5 (est.) + 40% × 54.8 = 59

    N Fera SU1: 60% × 55 + 40% × 64.7 = 59

    No road tests of dry for Potenza RE030. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 56

    Wet

    N Fera SU1 +8
    64
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE030N Fera SU1
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests≈ 59 (est.)62
    Reviews found online5168

    Potenza RE030: 60% × 59.5 (est.) + 40% × 51.4 = 56

    N Fera SU1: 60% × 61.9 + 40% × 67.6 = 64

    No road tests of wet for Potenza RE030. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    58
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE030N Fera SU1
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online–49

    N Fera SU1: 60% × 63 (est.) + 40% × 49.2 = 58

    No road tests of snow for N Fera SU1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 56

    Comfort

    N Fera SU1 +10
    66
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE030N Fera SU1
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests≈ 65 (est.)66
    Reviews found online4367

    Potenza RE030: 60% × 64.6 (est.) + 40% × 43.1 = 56

    N Fera SU1: 60% × 65.7 + 40% × 66.6 = 66

    No road tests of comfort for Potenza RE030. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    70
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE030N Fera SU1
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests–69
    Reviews found online–70

    N Fera SU1: 60% × 69.3 + 40% × 70 = 70

  6. 67

    Treadwear

    Level
    67
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE030N Fera SU1
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 67 (est.)70
    Reviews found online6961

    Potenza RE030: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 68.7 = 67

    N Fera SU1: 60% × 70.2 + 40% × 61.4 = 67

    No road tests of treadwear for Potenza RE030. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 49

    Handling (owners)

    N Fera SU1 +17
    66
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE030N Fera SU1
    Reviews found online4966
Scores at a glance
CategoryBridgestone Potenza RE030Nexen N Fera SU1
Relative Score 58 63
Dry 59 59
Wet 56 64
Snow – 58
Comfort 56 66
Noise – 70
Treadwear 67 67
Handling (owners) 49 66

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Potenza RE030

N Fera SU1

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Potenza RE030

Pros

  • Exceptional tread longevity and durability
  • Reliable and consistent dry road grip
  • Strong, stiff sidewall construction

Cons

  • High levels of cabin road noise
  • Poor traction and handling in wet conditions
  • Tendency toward understeer
All owner themes in the Potenza RE030 review

Tire B N Fera SU1

Pros

  • Exceptional value and significantly lower price compared to premium brands
  • Remarkably quiet ride and high overall comfort
  • Strong dry and wet grip for daily commuting and spirited driving

Cons

  • Soft sidewalls can cause vague handling, body roll, or a floating sensation on heavier vehicles
  • Faster than average tread wear or inconsistent durability for some users
  • Reports of rubber cracking or splitting along the sidewalls and tread blocks over time
All owner themes in the N Fera SU1 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Potenza RE030 B · Nexen N Fera SU1
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available—97
Rim diameters—15″ – 24″
Tread depth—9/32″
UTQG—300 A A
Treadwear warranty—25,000 mi
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—51 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone Potenza RE030

Nexen N Fera SU1

Winner: Nexen N Fera SU1 — better handling, comfort and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score. Bridgestone Potenza RE030 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 8 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Nexen N Fera SU1 scores 66 vs 49 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Nexen N Fera SU1 scores 66 vs 56 on comfort.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Nexen N Fera SU1 scores 64 vs 56 on wet.

Tire A · Bridgestone Potenza RE030
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Nexen N Fera SU1
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Potenza RE030 or N Fera SU1?

Which is better in the wet, Potenza RE030 or N Fera SU1?

Nexen N Fera SU1, 64 vs 56 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Potenza RE030 or N Fera SU1?

Neither, by our numbers: 59 vs 59 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, Potenza RE030 or N Fera SU1?

Nexen N Fera SU1, 66 vs 56 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Potenza RE030 or N Fera SU1?

Neither, by our numbers: 67 vs 67 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology