Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone Potenza RE040 vs Hankook Kinergy PT — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 49 + 2 owner reviews. How we score

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Hankook Kinergy PT
Tire BHankook

Kinergy PT

All Season Premium Touring tires

Tests – · none yet Owners – · 2 reviews (needs 5)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 54

    Dry

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE040Kinergy PT
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 59 (est.)–
    Reviews found online46–

    Potenza RE040: 60% × 59 (est.) + 40% × 46.4 = 54

    No road tests of dry for Potenza RE040. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 51

    Wet

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE040Kinergy PT
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 56 (est.)–
    Reviews found online44–

    Potenza RE040: 60% × 55.7 (est.) + 40% × 43.6 = 51

    No road tests of wet for Potenza RE040. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 48

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE040Kinergy PT
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 57 (est.)–
    Reviews found online34–

    Potenza RE040: 60% × 57 (est.) + 40% × 34 = 48

    No road tests of snow for Potenza RE040. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 46

    Comfort

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE040Kinergy PT
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 63 (est.)–
    Reviews found online35–

    Potenza RE040: 40% × 62.9 (est.) + 60% × 35.4 = 46

    No road tests of comfort for Potenza RE040. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 54

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE040Kinergy PT
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)–
    Reviews found online36–

    Potenza RE040: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 35.8 = 54

    No road tests of noise for Potenza RE040. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 50

    Treadwear

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE040Kinergy PT
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 57 (est.)–
    Reviews found online40–

    Potenza RE040: 60% × 56.9 (est.) + 40% × 39.7 = 50

    No road tests of treadwear for Potenza RE040. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 48

    Handling (owners)

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE040Kinergy PT
    Reviews found online48–
Scores at a glance
Bridgestone Potenza RE040 vs Hankook Kinergy PT: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBridgestone Potenza RE040Hankook Kinergy PT
Relative Score 51 –
Dry 54 –
Wet 51 –
Snow 48 –
Comfort 46 –
Noise 54 –
Treadwear 50 –
Handling (owners) 48 –

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Potenza RE040

Kinergy PT

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Potenza RE040

Pros

  • Excellent dry weather grip and handling
  • High level of steering feedback and directness
  • Progressive and predictable breakaway characteristics

Cons

  • Excessive and intrusive road noise
  • Poor performance and lack of confidence in wet or cold conditions
  • Harsh ride quality due to stiff construction
All owner themes in the Potenza RE040 review

Tire B Kinergy PT

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Potenza RE040 B · Hankook Kinergy PT
CategorySummerAll Season Premium Touring tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available3—
Rim diameters16″ – 18″—
Tread depth10/32″—
UTQG140 A A—
SidewallBlackwall—

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone Potenza RE040

Hankook Kinergy PT

Only Bridgestone Potenza RE040 has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.

Tire A · Bridgestone Potenza RE040
Tire B · Hankook Kinergy PT

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology