Tests – · none yet Owners 51 · 60 reviews
Bridgestone Potenza RE050 vs Continental PremiumContact 6 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 42 road tests and 60 + 2,364 owner reviews. How we score
PremiumContact 6 is ahead, 79–57
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 84 · 42 tests Owners 75 · 2,364 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 50 in 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test (wet braking)
“My continental premium contact 6’s getting to end or ? I am using these for the last 3 years and drove 46K km on them. Treadwear indicator for 3mm is getting very close. Should I rush or let them run for maybe another 5-10K ? Read more”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
59
Dry
PremiumContact 6 +2584Why this score
Source Potenza RE050 PremiumContact 6 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 39 tests ≈ 62 (est.) 88 Reviews found online 55 78 Potenza RE050: 60% × 62.4 (est.) + 40% × 54.6 = 59
PremiumContact 6: 60% × 87.7 + 40% × 78.1 = 84
No road tests of dry for Potenza RE050. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
59
Wet
PremiumContact 6 +2685Why this score
Source Potenza RE050 PremiumContact 6 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 40 tests ≈ 62 (est.) 88 Reviews found online 54 81 Potenza RE050: 60% × 61.6 (est.) + 40% × 54.1 = 59
PremiumContact 6: 60% × 88.5 + 40% × 80.5 = 85
No road tests of wet for Potenza RE050. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
58
Snow
PremiumContact 6 +1674Why this score
Source Potenza RE050 PremiumContact 6 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 64 (est.) ≈ 73 (est.) Reviews found online 49 77 Potenza RE050: 60% × 63.6 (est.) + 40% × 48.5 = 58
PremiumContact 6: 60% × 72.6 (est.) + 40% × 76.9 = 74
No road tests of snow for Potenza RE050. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for PremiumContact 6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
50
Comfort
PremiumContact 6 +2575Why this score
Source Potenza RE050 PremiumContact 6 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 10 tests ≈ 63 (est.) 80 Reviews found online 42 71 Potenza RE050: 40% × 63.3 (est.) + 60% × 41.9 = 50
PremiumContact 6: 40% × 80.1 + 60% × 70.9 = 75
No road tests of comfort for Potenza RE050. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
60
Noise
Potenza RE050 +555Why this score
Source Potenza RE050 PremiumContact 6 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 22 tests ≈ 66 (est.) 43 Reviews found online 50 72 Potenza RE050: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 50.3 = 60
PremiumContact 6: 60% × 43.1 + 40% × 72.4 = 55
No road tests of noise for Potenza RE050. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
54
Treadwear
PremiumContact 6 +2579Why this score
Source Potenza RE050 PremiumContact 6 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 7 tests ≈ 59 (est.) 88 Reviews found online 46 65 Potenza RE050: 60% × 59.3 (est.) + 40% × 46.4 = 54
PremiumContact 6: 60% × 88.1 + 40% × 65.1 = 79
No road tests of treadwear for Potenza RE050. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
52
Handling (owners)
PremiumContact 6 +2577Why this score
Source Potenza RE050 PremiumContact 6 Reviews found online 52 77 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison74Why this score
Source Potenza RE050 PremiumContact 6 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 25 tests – 74
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Potenza RE050 | Continental PremiumContact 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 57 | 79 |
| Dry | 59 | 84 |
| Wet | 59 | 85 |
| Snow | 58 | 74 |
| Comfort | 50 | 75 |
| Noise | 60 | 55 |
| Treadwear | 54 | 79 |
| Handling (owners) | 52 | 77 |
| Efficiency | – | 74 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Potenza RE050
PremiumContact 6
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Potenza RE050
Pros
- Exceptional dry weather grip and cornering stability
- High levels of steering feedback and road communication
- Predictable and progressive handling characteristics when new
Cons
- Significant increase in road noise over the life of the tire
- Noticeable decline in wet-weather traction and hydroplaning resistance as tread depth decreases
- Inconsistent tread life, with many users reporting premature wear
Tire B PremiumContact 6
Pros
- Exceptional grip and short braking distances on both dry and wet road surfaces
- Precise steering response and predictable handling near the limit
- High level of high-speed stability and driver confidence
Cons
- Faster tread wear and shorter lifespan reported by spirited drivers
- Increased road noise and harshness on coarse or rough asphalt
- Softer sidewalls can result in less immediate turn-in sharpness compared to dedicated ultra-high-performance tires
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Bridgestone Potenza RE050
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Continental PremiumContact 6
The community generally views the Continental PremiumContact 6 favorably, praising its wet grip, braking confidence, and overall capability across a range of cars including EVs and hot hatches. Criticisms are limited to a soft or soggy sidewall feel, high replacement cost on some OE fitments, and moderate longevity (e.g. ~22k km front on a Polestar 2, ~46k km elsewhere). Noise is considered acceptable, and several users prefer it to Michelin alternatives or the newer PC7 predecessor comparisons.
“Continental PremiumContact 6 Bought in 2020. new, first picture is front, second is back, I rotated them 2 years ago. I see some dry rot, but they could be good for this and another year? Škoda Octavia 1.9TDI 110hp, tire size 195-65-15”
“In the case of summer tyres nope at the part of the market things haven't changed THAT MUCH... But there are now better tyres, smoother, quieter better handling..the Conti Premium Contact 6 on my cars was a noticeable improvement.. Price can be a major variable..not sure how they price out.. Assy 6 and PS5s are both in the same space as the Conti Premium 6.. Again had Assy 5 and it was a very good tyre..the Assy 6 is even better.. Each turn of the design just keeps getting better..the R+Ts are just old designs..things have moved on..BUT NOT THAT MUCH!”
“Zimska, WinterContact 870. Ljetna, Premium Contact 6. Mislim, i dalje (namjerno) furam 15 cola pa neću uzimat šrot za 50 eur kad Continental košta 80 eur.”
Based on 17 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Potenza RE050 | B · Continental PremiumContact 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 4 | 113 |
| Rim diameters | 17″ – 19″ | 15″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | 9/32″ | 8 - 9/32″ |
| UTQG | 140 A A | 280 A - AA A |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Black Side Wall |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | 50 - 51 psi |
| Sizes in common | 3 | 3 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone Potenza RE050
Continental PremiumContact 6
Winner: Continental PremiumContact 6 — better wet, dry and comfort. Pick the Bridgestone Potenza RE050 if noise matters most to you.
Continental PremiumContact 6 scores 85 vs 59 on wet.
Continental PremiumContact 6 scores 84 vs 59 on dry.
Continental PremiumContact 6 scores 75 vs 50 on comfort.
Continental PremiumContact 6 scores 79 vs 54 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Potenza RE050 or PremiumContact 6?
Which is better in the wet, Potenza RE050 or PremiumContact 6?
Continental PremiumContact 6, 85 vs 59 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Potenza RE050 or PremiumContact 6?
Continental PremiumContact 6, 84 vs 59 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Potenza RE050 or PremiumContact 6?
Continental PremiumContact 6, 74 vs 58 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, Potenza RE050 or PremiumContact 6?
Bridgestone Potenza RE050, 60 vs 55 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Potenza RE050 or PremiumContact 6?
Continental PremiumContact 6, 75 vs 50 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Potenza RE050 or PremiumContact 6?
Continental PremiumContact 6, 79 vs 54 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology