tirewheelguide

Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone Potenza RE080 vs Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 9 + 31 owner reviews. How we score

Advan Neova AD08 is ahead, 71–65

Check price on Amazon · Advan Neova AD08 or Potenza RE080 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 66

    Dry

    Advan Neova AD08 +9
    75
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE080Advan Neova AD08
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 73 (est.)
    Reviews found online6580

    Potenza RE080: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 64.6 = 66

    Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 72.5 (est.) + 40% × 79.7 = 75

    No road tests of dry for Potenza RE080. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 66

    Wet

    Advan Neova AD08 +3
    69
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE080Advan Neova AD08
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online6569

    Potenza RE080: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 65.3 = 66

    Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 69.1 (est.) + 40% × 68.5 = 69

    No road tests of wet for Potenza RE080. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    65
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE080Advan Neova AD08
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online–61

    Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 67 (est.) + 40% × 61.3 = 65

    No road tests of snow for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 64

    Comfort

    Advan Neova AD08 +4
    68
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE080Advan Neova AD08
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online6067

    Potenza RE080: 60% × 67.5 (est.) + 40% × 59.6 = 64

    Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 68.7 (est.) + 40% × 66.6 = 68

    No road tests of comfort for Potenza RE080 or Advan Neova AD08. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    67
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE080Advan Neova AD08
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online–68

    Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 67.8 = 67

    No road tests of noise for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 63

    Treadwear

    Level
    63
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE080Advan Neova AD08
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 64 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online6161

    Potenza RE080: 60% × 64.2 (est.) + 40% × 61 = 63

    Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 64.3 (est.) + 40% × 61.2 = 63

    No road tests of treadwear for Potenza RE080. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 67

    Handling (owners)

    Advan Neova AD08 +12
    79
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE080Advan Neova AD08
    Reviews found online6779
Scores at a glance
CategoryBridgestone Potenza RE080Yokohama Advan Neova AD08
Relative Score 65 71
Dry 66 75
Wet 66 69
Snow – 65
Comfort 64 68
Noise – 67
Treadwear 63 63
Handling (owners) 67 79

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Potenza RE080

Advan Neova AD08

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Potenza RE080

Pros

  • Excellent grip performance in both wet and dry road conditions
  • High durability and impressive tread life for many users
  • Predictable steering response and cornering confidence

Cons

  • Noticeable increase in road noise and tire roar over time
  • Ride comfort diminishes as the tire wears
  • Inconsistent tread life reports ranging from 25,000km to over 60,000km
All owner themes in the Potenza RE080 review

Tire B Advan Neova AD08

Pros

  • Phenomenal dry grip and cornering traction
  • Exceptional steering feedback and crisp response
  • Stiff, robust sidewall and carcass construction

Cons

  • Prone to overheating and rubber degradation/chunking during heavy track use
  • Reduced performance and aquaplaning tendencies in heavy standing water
  • Limited size availability for larger rims
All owner themes in the Advan Neova AD08 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Potenza RE080 B · Yokohama Advan Neova AD08
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Tread depth—9/32″
UTQG—180 A A
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—51 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone Potenza RE080

Yokohama Advan Neova AD08

Winner: Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 — better handling, dry and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score. Bridgestone Potenza RE080 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 9 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 scores 79 vs 67 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 scores 75 vs 66 on dry.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 scores 68 vs 64 on comfort.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 scores 69 vs 66 on wet.

Tire A · Bridgestone Potenza RE080
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Yokohama Advan Neova AD08
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Potenza RE080 or Advan Neova AD08?

Which is better in the wet, Potenza RE080 or Advan Neova AD08?

Yokohama Advan Neova AD08, 69 vs 66 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Potenza RE080 or Advan Neova AD08?

Yokohama Advan Neova AD08, 75 vs 66 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Potenza RE080 or Advan Neova AD08?

Yokohama Advan Neova AD08, 68 vs 64 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Potenza RE080 or Advan Neova AD08?

Neither, by our numbers: 63 vs 63 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology