Tests – · none yet Owners 63 · 20 reviews
Bridgestone Potenza RE720 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Head-to-head
Updated
Bridgestone Potenza RE720 vs Firestone Firehawk AS — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 20 + 8 owner reviews. How we score
Firehawk AS leads, 69–66 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 69 · 8 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
68
Dry
Firehawk AS +270Why this score
Source Potenza RE720 Firehawk AS Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 67 71 Potenza RE720: 60% × 67.8 (est.) + 40% × 67.4 = 68
Firehawk AS: 60% × 69.4 (est.) + 40% × 71.1 = 70
No road tests of dry for Potenza RE720. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for Firehawk AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
70
Wet
Potenza RE720 +169Why this score
Source Potenza RE720 Firehawk AS Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 69 69 Potenza RE720: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 69.4 = 70
Firehawk AS: 60% × 69.6 (est.) + 40% × 68.7 = 69
No road tests of wet for Potenza RE720. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Firehawk AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
–
Snow
No comparison66Why this score
Source Potenza RE720 Firehawk AS Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online – 63 Firehawk AS: 60% × 67.8 (est.) + 40% × 62.8 = 66
No road tests of snow for Firehawk AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
-
63
Comfort
Firehawk AS +669Why this score
Source Potenza RE720 Firehawk AS Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 60 70 Potenza RE720: 40% × 67.5 (est.) + 60% × 60 = 63
Firehawk AS: 40% × 69.2 (est.) + 60% × 69.5 = 69
No road tests of comfort for Potenza RE720 or Firehawk AS. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
–
Noise
No comparison70Why this score
Source Potenza RE720 Firehawk AS Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online – 74 Firehawk AS: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 74.3 = 70
No road tests of noise for Firehawk AS. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
58
Treadwear
Firehawk AS +1270Why this score
Source Potenza RE720 Firehawk AS Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 61 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 52 72 Potenza RE720: 60% × 61.3 (est.) + 40% × 52.3 = 58
Firehawk AS: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 71.7 = 70
No road tests of treadwear for Potenza RE720. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
No road tests of treadwear for Firehawk AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
67
Handling (owners)
Level67Why this score
Source Potenza RE720 Firehawk AS Reviews found online 67 67
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Potenza RE720 | Firestone Firehawk AS |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 66 | 69 |
| Dry | 68 | 70 |
| Wet | 70 | 69 |
| Snow | – | 66 |
| Comfort | 63 | 69 |
| Noise | – | 70 |
| Treadwear | 58 | 70 |
| Handling (owners) | 67 | 67 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
66
/ 100
Potenza RE720
69
/ 100
Firehawk AS
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Potenza RE720
Pros
- Exceptional dry grip and cornering stability
- High steering responsiveness due to stiff sidewalls
- Predictable and progressive handling characteristics
Cons
- Rapid tread wear and short overall lifespan
- Harsh ride quality and lack of comfort
- High price-to-value ratio compared to competitors
Tire B Firehawk AS
Pros
- Exceptionally quiet and smooth ride quality
- Strong dry handling and improved cornering response
- Good water dispersion and wet road performance for most users
Cons
- Potential susceptibility to hydroplaning in heavy rain according to select reviewers
- Requires proper balancing to prevent irregular tread wear
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Potenza RE720 | B · Firestone Firehawk AS |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | All Season High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 4 |
| Rim diameters | — | 15″ – 18″ |
| Tread depth | — | 11/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 480 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 50,000 mi |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 44 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
66
/ 100
Bridgestone Potenza RE720
69
/ 100
Firestone Firehawk AS
Narrow edge: Firestone Firehawk AS — better treadwear and comfort. Where the Bridgestone Potenza RE720 is ahead, it is by less than 3 points. Firestone Firehawk AS rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 8 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Firestone Firehawk AS scores 70 vs 58 on treadwear.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Firestone Firehawk AS scores 69 vs 63 on comfort.
Tire A · Bridgestone Potenza RE720
Tire B · Firestone Firehawk AS
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Potenza RE720 or Firehawk AS?
Which is better in the wet, Potenza RE720 or Firehawk AS?
Neither, by our numbers: 70 vs 69 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, Potenza RE720 or Firehawk AS?
Neither, by our numbers: 68 vs 70 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, Potenza RE720 or Firehawk AS?
Firestone Firehawk AS, 69 vs 63 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Potenza RE720 or Firehawk AS?
Firestone Firehawk AS, 70 vs 58 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology