Bridgestone Potenza RE720 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone Potenza RE720 vs Hankook Ventus V2 Concept — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 20 + 12 owner reviews. How we score

Potenza RE720 leads, 66–63 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 68

    Dry

    Potenza RE720 +5
    63
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE720Ventus V2 Concept
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online6760

    Potenza RE720: 60% × 67.8 (est.) + 40% × 67.4 = 68

    Ventus V2 Concept: 60% × 64.8 (est.) + 40% × 60.2 = 63

    No road tests of dry for Potenza RE720. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

    No road tests of dry for Ventus V2 Concept. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 70

    Wet

    Potenza RE720 +5
    65
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE720Ventus V2 Concept
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online6962

    Potenza RE720: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 69.4 = 70

    Ventus V2 Concept: 60% × 66.1 (est.) + 40% × 62.3 = 65

    No road tests of wet for Potenza RE720. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Ventus V2 Concept. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    45
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE720Ventus V2 Concept
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 55 (est.)
    Reviews found online–30

    Ventus V2 Concept: 60% × 55.5 (est.) + 40% × 29.9 = 45

    No road tests of snow for Ventus V2 Concept. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 63

    Comfort

    Potenza RE720 +2
    61
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE720Ventus V2 Concept
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online6057

    Potenza RE720: 40% × 67.5 (est.) + 60% × 60 = 63

    Ventus V2 Concept: 40% × 67 (est.) + 60% × 57.4 = 61

    No road tests of comfort for Potenza RE720 or Ventus V2 Concept. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 58

    Treadwear

    Ventus V2 Concept +3
    61
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE720Ventus V2 Concept
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 61 (est.)≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online5257

    Potenza RE720: 60% × 61.3 (est.) + 40% × 52.3 = 58

    Ventus V2 Concept: 60% × 63 (est.) + 40% × 57.1 = 61

    No road tests of treadwear for Potenza RE720. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

    No road tests of treadwear for Ventus V2 Concept. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  6. 67

    Handling (owners)

    Potenza RE720 +7
    60
    Why this score
    SourcePotenza RE720Ventus V2 Concept
    Reviews found online6760
Scores at a glance
Bridgestone Potenza RE720 vs Hankook Ventus V2 Concept: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBridgestone Potenza RE720Hankook Ventus V2 Concept
Relative Score 66 63
Dry 68 63
Wet 70 65
Snow – 45
Comfort 63 61
Treadwear 58 61
Handling (owners) 67 60

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Potenza RE720

± 8

Ventus V2 Concept

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Potenza RE720

Pros

  • Exceptional dry grip and cornering stability
  • High steering responsiveness due to stiff sidewalls
  • Predictable and progressive handling characteristics

Cons

  • Rapid tread wear and short overall lifespan
  • Harsh ride quality and lack of comfort
  • High price-to-value ratio compared to competitors
All owner themes in the Potenza RE720 review

Tire B Ventus V2 Concept

Pros

  • Excellent handling and cornering performance on dry surfaces
  • High value for money and affordability for budget-conscious buyers
  • Impressive tread life and longevity, with some users reporting up to 70,000 km of use

Cons

  • Becomes significantly noisy as the tire ages and wears
  • Poor grip in snow and ice conditions
  • Durability issues including sidewall wear and vulnerability to curb damage
All owner themes in the Ventus V2 Concept review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Potenza RE720 B · Hankook Ventus V2 Concept
CategorySummerAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone Potenza RE720

Hankook Ventus V2 Concept

Narrow edge: Bridgestone Potenza RE720 — better handling, dry and wet. Pick the Hankook Ventus V2 Concept if treadwear matters most to you. Hankook Ventus V2 Concept rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 12 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Bridgestone Potenza RE720 scores 67 vs 60 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Bridgestone Potenza RE720 scores 68 vs 63 on dry.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Bridgestone Potenza RE720 scores 70 vs 65 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Hankook Ventus V2 Concept scores 61 vs 58 on treadwear.

Tire A · Bridgestone Potenza RE720
Tire B · Hankook Ventus V2 Concept

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Potenza RE720 or Ventus V2 Concept?

Which is better in the wet, Potenza RE720 or Ventus V2 Concept?

Bridgestone Potenza RE720, 70 vs 65 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Potenza RE720 or Ventus V2 Concept?

Bridgestone Potenza RE720, 68 vs 63 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Potenza RE720 or Ventus V2 Concept?

Neither, by our numbers: 63 vs 61 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, Potenza RE720 or Ventus V2 Concept?

Hankook Ventus V2 Concept, 61 vs 58 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology