Bridgestone RE11A looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone RE11A vs Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 4 + 31 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: RE11A and Advan Neova AD08 are level at 71.

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Bridgestone RE11A

RE11A

Summer Extreme Performance tires

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 70 · 4 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 72

    Dry

    Advan Neova AD08 +3
    75
    Why this score
    SourceRE11AAdvan Neova AD08
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 73 (est.)
    Reviews found online7480

    RE11A: 60% × 70.1 (est.) + 40% × 73.7 = 72

    Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 72.5 (est.) + 40% × 79.7 = 75

    No road tests of dry for RE11A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 73

    Wet

    RE11A +4
    69
    Why this score
    SourceRE11AAdvan Neova AD08
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 73 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online7569

    RE11A: 60% × 72.5 (est.) + 40% × 74.7 = 73

    Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 69.1 (est.) + 40% × 68.5 = 69

    No road tests of wet for RE11A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    65
    Why this score
    SourceRE11AAdvan Neova AD08
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online–61

    Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 67 (est.) + 40% × 61.3 = 65

    No road tests of snow for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 69

    Comfort

    RE11A +1
    68
    Why this score
    SourceRE11AAdvan Neova AD08
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online6967

    RE11A: 60% × 69.1 (est.) + 40% × 68.8 = 69

    Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 68.7 (est.) + 40% × 66.6 = 68

    No road tests of comfort for RE11A or Advan Neova AD08. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    67
    Why this score
    SourceRE11AAdvan Neova AD08
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online–68

    Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 67.8 = 67

    No road tests of noise for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 64

    Treadwear

    RE11A +1
    63
    Why this score
    SourceRE11AAdvan Neova AD08
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online6261

    RE11A: 60% × 64.5 (est.) + 40% × 62.1 = 64

    Advan Neova AD08: 60% × 64.3 (est.) + 40% × 61.2 = 63

    No road tests of treadwear for RE11A. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Advan Neova AD08. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 73

    Handling (owners)

    Advan Neova AD08 +6
    79
    Why this score
    SourceRE11AAdvan Neova AD08
    Reviews found online7379
Scores at a glance
Bridgestone RE11A vs Yokohama Advan Neova AD08: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBridgestone RE11AYokohama Advan Neova AD08
Relative Score 71 71
Dry 72 75
Wet 73 69
Snow – 65
Comfort 69 68
Noise – 67
Treadwear 64 63
Handling (owners) 73 79

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

RE11A

Advan Neova AD08

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A RE11A

Pros

  • Exceptional dry grip and cornering stability
  • Surprisingly quiet and refined road noise levels
  • Stiff sidewall construction providing sharp steering response

Cons

  • Stiff sidewalls may be perceived as harsh by some drivers
  • Limited long-term tread life data available from current users
All owner themes in the RE11A review

Tire B Advan Neova AD08

Pros

  • Phenomenal dry grip and cornering traction
  • Exceptional steering feedback and crisp response
  • Stiff, robust sidewall and carcass construction

Cons

  • Prone to overheating and rubber degradation/chunking during heavy track use
  • Reduced performance and aquaplaning tendencies in heavy standing water
  • Limited size availability for larger rims
All owner themes in the Advan Neova AD08 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone RE11A B · Yokohama Advan Neova AD08
CategorySummer Extreme Performance tiresSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Tread depth—9/32″
UTQG—180 A A
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—51 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone RE11A

Yokohama Advan Neova AD08

Too close to call: Bridgestone RE11A and Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 are within 2 points overall. Bridgestone RE11A is stronger on wet. Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 is stronger on handling and dry. Bridgestone RE11A rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 4 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 scores 79 vs 73 on handling.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Bridgestone RE11A scores 73 vs 69 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Yokohama Advan Neova AD08 scores 75 vs 72 on dry.

Tire A · Bridgestone RE11A
Tire B · Yokohama Advan Neova AD08

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

RE11A or Advan Neova AD08?

Which is better in the wet, RE11A or Advan Neova AD08?

Bridgestone RE11A, 73 vs 69 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, RE11A or Advan Neova AD08?

Yokohama Advan Neova AD08, 75 vs 72 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, RE11A or Advan Neova AD08?

Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 68 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, RE11A or Advan Neova AD08?

Neither, by our numbers: 64 vs 63 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology