Bridgestone Turanza AR10 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Bridgestone Turanza AR10 vs Firestone Firehawk AS — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 5 + 8 owner reviews. How we score

Firehawk AS is ahead, 69–61

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Firestone Firehawk AS
Tire BFirestone

Firehawk AS

All Season High Performance tires

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 69 · 8 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 61

    Dry

    Firehawk AS +9
    70
    Why this score
    SourceTuranza AR10Firehawk AS
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 64 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online5871

    Turanza AR10: 60% × 63.8 (est.) + 40% × 57.9 = 61

    Firehawk AS: 60% × 69 (est.) + 40% × 70.6 = 70

    No road tests of dry for Turanza AR10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for Firehawk AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 63

    Wet

    Firehawk AS +6
    69
    Why this score
    SourceTuranza AR10Firehawk AS
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online6068

    Turanza AR10: 60% × 64.9 (est.) + 40% × 60 = 63

    Firehawk AS: 60% × 69.4 (est.) + 40% × 68.4 = 69

    No road tests of wet for Turanza AR10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Firehawk AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    66
    Why this score
    SourceTuranza AR10Firehawk AS
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online–62

    Firehawk AS: 60% × 67.9 (est.) + 40% × 62.4 = 66

    No road tests of snow for Firehawk AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 60

    Comfort

    Firehawk AS +9
    69
    Why this score
    SourceTuranza AR10Firehawk AS
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online5669

    Turanza AR10: 40% × 66 (est.) + 60% × 55.7 = 60

    Firehawk AS: 40% × 68.7 (est.) + 60% × 68.8 = 69

    No road tests of comfort for Turanza AR10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for Firehawk AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    70
    Why this score
    SourceTuranza AR10Firehawk AS
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online–74

    Firehawk AS: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 74.1 = 70

    No road tests of noise for Firehawk AS. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 59

    Treadwear

    Firehawk AS +11
    70
    Why this score
    SourceTuranza AR10Firehawk AS
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 62 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online5572

    Turanza AR10: 60% × 62.3 (est.) + 40% × 54.8 = 59

    Firehawk AS: 60% × 68.5 (est.) + 40% × 71.9 = 70

    No road tests of treadwear for Turanza AR10. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Firehawk AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 58

    Handling (owners)

    Firehawk AS +9
    67
    Why this score
    SourceTuranza AR10Firehawk AS
    Reviews found online5867
Scores at a glance
Bridgestone Turanza AR10 vs Firestone Firehawk AS: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryBridgestone Turanza AR10Firestone Firehawk AS
Relative Score 61 69
Dry 61 70
Wet 63 69
Snow – 66
Comfort 60 69
Noise – 70
Treadwear 59 70
Handling (owners) 58 67

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Turanza AR10

± 8

Firehawk AS

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Turanza AR10

Pros

  • Reliable all-around performance for daily driving
  • Low noise levels and high comfort
  • Good tread life and durability under moderate conditions

Cons

  • Inconsistent grip during heavy braking
  • Potential for premature cracking in extreme heat
  • Average performance in high-demand or sporting scenarios
All owner themes in the Turanza AR10 review

Tire B Firehawk AS

Pros

  • Exceptionally quiet and smooth ride quality
  • Strong dry handling and improved cornering response
  • Good water dispersion and wet road performance for most users

Cons

  • Potential susceptibility to hydroplaning in heavy rain according to select reviewers
  • Requires proper balancing to prevent irregular tread wear
All owner themes in the Firehawk AS review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Bridgestone Turanza AR10 B · Firestone Firehawk AS
CategorySummerAll Season High Performance tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available—5
Rim diameters—15″ – 18″
Tread depth—11/32″
UTQG—480 A A
Treadwear warranty—50,000 mi
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—44 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Bridgestone Turanza AR10

Firestone Firehawk AS

Winner: Firestone Firehawk AS — better treadwear, dry and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score. Bridgestone Turanza AR10 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 5 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Firestone Firehawk AS rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 8 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Firestone Firehawk AS scores 70 vs 59 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Firestone Firehawk AS scores 70 vs 61 on dry.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Firestone Firehawk AS scores 69 vs 60 on comfort.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Firestone Firehawk AS scores 67 vs 58 on handling.

Tire A · Bridgestone Turanza AR10
Tire B · Firestone Firehawk AS

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Turanza AR10 or Firehawk AS?

Which is better in the wet, Turanza AR10 or Firehawk AS?

Firestone Firehawk AS, 69 vs 63 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Turanza AR10 or Firehawk AS?

Firestone Firehawk AS, 70 vs 61 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Turanza AR10 or Firehawk AS?

Firestone Firehawk AS, 69 vs 60 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Turanza AR10 or Firehawk AS?

Firestone Firehawk AS, 70 vs 59 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology