Tests – · none yet Owners 49 · 12 reviews
Bridgestone Turanza ER300 RFT vs Goodyear Excellence RunOnFlat — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 12 + 1 owner reviews. How we score
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners – · 1 review (needs 5)
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
53
Dry
No comparison–Why this score
Source Turanza ER300 RFT Excellence RunOnFlat Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 58 (est.) – Reviews found online 45 – Turanza ER300 RFT: 60% × 58.4 (est.) + 40% × 45.1 = 53
No road tests of dry for Turanza ER300 RFT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
57
Wet
No comparison–Why this score
Source Turanza ER300 RFT Excellence RunOnFlat Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 60 (est.) – Reviews found online 52 – Turanza ER300 RFT: 60% × 60.2 (est.) + 40% × 51.6 = 57
No road tests of wet for Turanza ER300 RFT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
55
Comfort
No comparison–Why this score
Source Turanza ER300 RFT Excellence RunOnFlat Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) – Reviews found online 48 – Turanza ER300 RFT: 40% × 65.3 (est.) + 60% × 48 = 55
No road tests of comfort for Turanza ER300 RFT. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
57
Treadwear
No comparison–Why this score
Source Turanza ER300 RFT Excellence RunOnFlat Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 61 (est.) – Reviews found online 51 – Turanza ER300 RFT: 60% × 60.8 (est.) + 40% × 50.9 = 57
No road tests of treadwear for Turanza ER300 RFT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
52
Handling (owners)
No comparison–Why this score
Source Turanza ER300 RFT Excellence RunOnFlat Reviews found online 52 –
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Turanza ER300 RFT | Goodyear Excellence RunOnFlat |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 55 | – |
| Dry | 53 | – |
| Wet | 57 | – |
| Comfort | 55 | – |
| Treadwear | 57 | – |
| Handling (owners) | 52 | – |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Turanza ER300 RFT
Excellence RunOnFlat
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Turanza ER300 RFT
Pros
- Decent dry grip and acceptable comfort for a run-flat tire
- Impressive tread life and mileage reported by highway and long-distance drivers
- Reliable OEM fitment integration for compatible vehicles like BMW models
Cons
- Subpar or near-zero grip in wet conditions, frequently causing traction control activation
- Harsh and noisy ride quality typical of the run-flat construction
- Rapid tread wear reported by some drivers on mixed roads
Tire B Excellence RunOnFlat
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Turanza ER300 RFT | B · Goodyear Excellence RunOnFlat |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer tire |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone Turanza ER300 RFT
Goodyear Excellence RunOnFlat
Only Bridgestone Turanza ER300 RFT has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology