Tests – · none yet Owners 44 · 25 reviews
Bridgestone Potenza RE92A looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Head-to-head
Updated
Bridgestone Turanza ER33 vs Bridgestone Potenza RE92A — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 25 + 1 owner reviews. How we score
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners – · 1 review (needs 5)
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
50
Dry
No comparison–Why this score
Source Turanza ER33 Potenza RE92A Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 57 (est.) – Reviews found online 41 – Turanza ER33: 60% × 56.8 (est.) + 40% × 40.9 = 50
No road tests of dry for Turanza ER33. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
49
Wet
No comparison–Why this score
Source Turanza ER33 Potenza RE92A Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 54 (est.) – Reviews found online 41 – Turanza ER33: 60% × 54.4 (est.) + 40% × 40.6 = 49
No road tests of wet for Turanza ER33. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.54).
-
46
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source Turanza ER33 Potenza RE92A Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 57 (est.) – Reviews found online 29 – Turanza ER33: 60% × 57.2 (est.) + 40% × 29.3 = 46
No road tests of snow for Turanza ER33. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
46
Comfort
No comparison–Why this score
Source Turanza ER33 Potenza RE92A Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 63 (est.) – Reviews found online 35 – Turanza ER33: 40% × 63 (est.) + 60% × 34.6 = 46
No road tests of comfort for Turanza ER33. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
58
Noise
No comparison–Why this score
Source Turanza ER33 Potenza RE92A Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) – Reviews found online 44 – Turanza ER33: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 44.4 = 58
No road tests of noise for Turanza ER33. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
63
Treadwear
No comparison–Why this score
Source Turanza ER33 Potenza RE92A Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 64 (est.) – Reviews found online 61 – Turanza ER33: 60% × 64.4 (est.) + 40% × 60.5 = 63
No road tests of treadwear for Turanza ER33. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
41
Handling (owners)
No comparison–Why this score
Source Turanza ER33 Potenza RE92A Reviews found online 41 –
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Turanza ER33 | Bridgestone Potenza RE92A |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 51 | – |
| Dry | 50 | – |
| Wet | 49 | – |
| Snow | 46 | – |
| Comfort | 46 | – |
| Noise | 58 | – |
| Treadwear | 63 | – |
| Handling (owners) | 41 | – |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
51
/ 100
Turanza ER33
–
/ 100
Potenza RE92A
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Turanza ER33
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and durability
- Reliable dry-weather grip and handling
- Stiff sidewall construction
Cons
- High levels of cabin and road noise
- Poor wet-weather performance and hydroplaning resistance
- Mediocre ride comfort and impact absorption
Tire B Potenza RE92A
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Turanza ER33 | B · Bridgestone Potenza RE92A |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer Ultra High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 12 | — |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 19″ | — |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 140 A A | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
51
/ 100
Bridgestone Turanza ER33
–
/ 100
Bridgestone Potenza RE92A
Only Bridgestone Turanza ER33 has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.
Tire A · Bridgestone Turanza ER33
Tire B · Bridgestone Potenza RE92A
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology