Tests – · none yet Owners 44 · 25 reviews
Bridgestone Turanza ER33 vs Bridgestone Turanza T005 Driveguard — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 25 + 3 owner reviews. How we score
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners – · 3 reviews (needs 5)
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
51
Dry
No comparison–Why this score
Source Turanza ER33 Turanza T005 Driveguard Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 57 (est.) – Reviews found online 41 – Turanza ER33: 60% × 56.8 (est.) + 40% × 41.3 = 51
No road tests of dry for Turanza ER33. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
49
Wet
No comparison–Why this score
Source Turanza ER33 Turanza T005 Driveguard Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 54 (est.) – Reviews found online 41 – Turanza ER33: 60% × 54.2 (est.) + 40% × 40.8 = 49
No road tests of wet for Turanza ER33. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
45
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source Turanza ER33 Turanza T005 Driveguard Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 56 (est.) – Reviews found online 30 – Turanza ER33: 60% × 55.5 (est.) + 40% × 30 = 45
No road tests of snow for Turanza ER33. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
-
46
Comfort
No comparison–Why this score
Source Turanza ER33 Turanza T005 Driveguard Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 63 (est.) – Reviews found online 35 – Turanza ER33: 40% × 62.9 (est.) + 60% × 34.8 = 46
No road tests of comfort for Turanza ER33. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
58
Noise
No comparison–Why this score
Source Turanza ER33 Turanza T005 Driveguard Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) – Reviews found online 45 – Turanza ER33: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 44.7 = 58
No road tests of noise for Turanza ER33. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
62
Treadwear
No comparison–Why this score
Source Turanza ER33 Turanza T005 Driveguard Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 64 (est.) – Reviews found online 60 – Turanza ER33: 60% × 64 (est.) + 40% × 60.1 = 62
No road tests of treadwear for Turanza ER33. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
41
Handling (owners)
No comparison–Why this score
Source Turanza ER33 Turanza T005 Driveguard Reviews found online 41 –
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Turanza ER33 | Bridgestone Turanza T005 Driveguard |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 51 | – |
| Dry | 51 | – |
| Wet | 49 | – |
| Snow | 45 | – |
| Comfort | 46 | – |
| Noise | 58 | – |
| Treadwear | 62 | – |
| Handling (owners) | 41 | – |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Turanza ER33
Turanza T005 Driveguard
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Turanza ER33
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and durability
- Reliable dry-weather grip and handling
- Stiff sidewall construction
Cons
- High levels of cabin and road noise
- Poor wet-weather performance and hydroplaning resistance
- Mediocre ride comfort and impact absorption
Tire B Turanza T005 Driveguard
Pros
- Low road noise levels contributing to a quieter cabin experience
- Effective Driveguard run-flat technology providing peace of mind and sidewall stability
- Improved handling responsiveness and traction compared to budget alternatives
Cons
- Mixed performance in wet conditions, with some users reporting a lack of grip under acceleration
- Accelerated wear reported by certain drivers, falling short of high mileage expectations
- Susceptibility to shoulder wear under aggressive driving conditions
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Turanza ER33 | B · Bridgestone Turanza T005 Driveguard |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 12 | 25 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 19″ | 16″ – 19″ |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 140 A A | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 44 psi | — |
| Sizes in common | 9 | 9 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone Turanza ER33
Bridgestone Turanza T005 Driveguard
Only Bridgestone Turanza ER33 has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology