Tests – · 1 test Owners 68 · 1 review
Best test result: #1 of 7 in Tire Rack Touring All-Season Tire Test (November 2025) (ice braking)
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 1 road tests and 1 + 35 owner reviews. How we score
AVID Ascend LX leads, 71–68 Narrow edge
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · 1 test Owners 68 · 1 review
Best test result: #1 of 7 in Tire Rack Touring All-Season Tire Test (November 2025) (ice braking)
Tests – · 1 test Owners 73 · 35 reviews
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | Turanza EverDrive | AVID Ascend LX |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 67 (est.) | ≈ 72 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 66 | 78 |
| Dry Braking (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–1 | 93% | 94% |
| Dry Circle (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 | 100% | 99% |
Turanza EverDrive: 60% × 67.1 (est.) + 40% × 66 = 67
AVID Ascend LX: 60% × 71.9 (est.) + 40% × 77.6 = 74
No road tests of dry for Turanza EverDrive. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for AVID Ascend LX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
| Source | Turanza EverDrive | AVID Ascend LX |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 72 (est.) | ≈ 73 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 73 | 75 |
| Wet Braking (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 | 93% | 91% |
| Wet Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 | 100% | 98% |
Turanza EverDrive: 60% × 71.8 (est.) + 40% × 72.6 = 72
AVID Ascend LX: 60% × 72.8 (est.) + 40% × 74.5 = 73
No road tests of wet for Turanza EverDrive. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for AVID Ascend LX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
| Source | Turanza EverDrive | AVID Ascend LX |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 68 (est.) | ≈ 67 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 64 | 61 |
| Ice Braking (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 | 100% | 89% |
| Snow Braking (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 | 87% | 77% |
| Snow Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 | 96% | 93% |
Turanza EverDrive: 60% × 68.3 (est.) + 40% × 63.5 = 66
AVID Ascend LX: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 60.6 = 65
No road tests of snow for Turanza EverDrive. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for AVID Ascend LX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
| Source | Turanza EverDrive | AVID Ascend LX |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 68 (est.) | ≈ 70 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 66 | 74 |
| Comfort (tester's mark) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 | 94% | 88% |
Turanza EverDrive: 40% × 68.1 (est.) + 60% × 65.8 = 67
AVID Ascend LX: 40% × 69.7 (est.) + 60% × 74 = 72
No road tests of comfort for Turanza EverDrive or AVID Ascend LX. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | Turanza EverDrive | AVID Ascend LX |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 1 tests | 69 | 63 |
| Reviews found online | ≈ 66 (est.) | 76 |
| Noise (tester's mark) (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0 | 91% | 85% |
Turanza EverDrive: 60% × 69.3 + 40% × 66.5 (est.) = 68
AVID Ascend LX: 60% × 62.7 + 40% × 75.8 = 68
No owner ratings of noise for Turanza EverDrive. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
| Source | Turanza EverDrive | AVID Ascend LX |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 67 (est.) | ≈ 69 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 67 | 75 |
Turanza EverDrive: 60% × 66.8 (est.) + 40% × 67.3 = 67
AVID Ascend LX: 60% × 69.4 (est.) + 40% × 74.6 = 71
No road tests of treadwear for Turanza EverDrive. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for AVID Ascend LX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
| Category | Bridgestone Turanza EverDrive | Yokohama AVID Ascend LX |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 68 | 71 |
| Dry | 67 | 74 |
| Wet | 72 | 73 |
| Snow | 66 | 65 |
| Comfort | 67 | 72 |
| Noise | 68 | 68 |
| Treadwear | 67 | 71 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Turanza EverDrive
AVID Ascend LX
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
In the overall rankings of 1 tests that ran both, Bridgestone Turanza EverDrive finished ahead 1 times and Yokohama AVID Ascend LX 0 times.
| Discipline | Category | Turanza EverDrive | AVID Ascend LX | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 93% | 94% | −0.7 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: Tire Rack Touring All-Season Tire Test (November 2025) · 215/55R17 |
| Dry Circle | Dry | 100% | 99% | +1.2 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: Tire Rack Touring All-Season Tire Test (November 2025) · 215/55R17 |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 93% | 91% | +2.2 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: Tire Rack Touring All-Season Tire Test (November 2025) · 215/55R17 |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 100% | 98% | +2.1 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: Tire Rack Touring All-Season Tire Test (November 2025) · 215/55R17 |
| Ice Braking | Snow | 100% | 89% | +10.8 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: Tire Rack Touring All-Season Tire Test (November 2025) · 215/55R17 |
| Snow Braking | Snow | 87% | 77% | +9.9 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: Tire Rack Touring All-Season Tire Test (November 2025) · 215/55R17 |
| Snow Handling | Snow | 96% | 93% | +2.7 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: Tire Rack Touring All-Season Tire Test (November 2025) · 215/55R17 |
| Comfort (tester's mark) | Comfort | 94% | 88% | +5.9 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: Tire Rack Touring All-Season Tire Test (November 2025) · 215/55R17 |
| Noise (tester's mark) | Noise | 91% | 85% | +6.1 | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: Tire Rack Touring All-Season Tire Test (November 2025) · 215/55R17 |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Road Rating (tester's mark) | Other | 97% | 100% | −3.4 | 0–1 in 1 shared test Newest: Tire Rack Touring All-Season Tire Test (November 2025) · 215/55R17 |
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #5/7 | #6/7 | – | 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: Tire Rack Touring All-Season Tire Test (November 2025) · 215/55R17 |
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Turanza EverDrive | B · Yokohama AVID Ascend LX |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Season tire | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 36 | 39 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 20″ | 15″ – 18″ |
| Tread depth | 11/32″ | 11/32″ |
| UTQG | 800 B B | 800 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | 80,000 mi | 85,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 50 psi | 51 psi |
| Sizes in common | 23 | 23 |
Bridgestone Turanza EverDrive
Yokohama AVID Ascend LX
Narrow edge: Yokohama AVID Ascend LX — better dry, comfort and treadwear. Where the Bridgestone Turanza EverDrive is ahead, it is by less than 3 points. Bridgestone Turanza EverDrive rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 1 review), so read this result as provisional.
Yokohama AVID Ascend LX scores 74 vs 67 on dry.
Yokohama AVID Ascend LX scores 72 vs 67 on comfort.
Yokohama AVID Ascend LX scores 71 vs 67 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Neither, by our numbers: 72 vs 73 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Yokohama AVID Ascend LX, 74 vs 67 on our dry score.
Neither, by our numbers: 66 vs 65 on the snow score, within 3 points.
Neither, by our numbers: 68 vs 68 on the noise score, within 3 points.
Yokohama AVID Ascend LX, 72 vs 67 on our comfort score.
Yokohama AVID Ascend LX, 71 vs 67 on our treadwear score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology