Tests 76 · 28 tests Owners 69 · 2,378 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 19 in 2023 UTAC Large Winter Tire Test R16 (wet handling)
“Conti allseason contact harsh and noisy”
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 28 + 1 road tests and 2,378 + 10 owner reviews. How we score
AllSeasonContact leads, 74–70 Narrow edge
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 76 · 28 tests Owners 69 · 2,378 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 19 in 2023 UTAC Large Winter Tire Test R16 (wet handling)
“Conti allseason contact harsh and noisy”
Tests 69 · 1 test Owners 70 · 10 reviews
Best test result: #2 of 10 in 2017 Auto Bild SUV Winter Tyre Test (wet braking)
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | AllSeasonContact | Wintrac xtreme S |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 28 / 1 tests | 69 | 68 |
| Reviews found online | 66 | 70 |
AllSeasonContact: 60% × 69.2 + 40% × 66 = 68
Wintrac xtreme S: 60% × 68.3 + 40% × 69.7 = 69
| Source | AllSeasonContact | Wintrac xtreme S |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 28 / 1 tests | 87 | 75 |
| Reviews found online | 76 | 75 |
AllSeasonContact: 60% × 87.4 + 40% × 75.9 = 83
Wintrac xtreme S: 60% × 74.7 + 40% × 74.8 = 75
| Source | AllSeasonContact | Wintrac xtreme S |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 22 / 1 tests | 88 | 64 |
| Reviews found online | 71 | 71 |
AllSeasonContact: 60% × 88.4 + 40% × 71.2 = 82
Wintrac xtreme S: 60% × 63.9 + 40% × 71 = 67
| Source | AllSeasonContact | Wintrac xtreme S |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests | 71 | ≈ 69 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 69 | 71 |
AllSeasonContact: 40% × 71.3 + 60% × 68.8 = 70
Wintrac xtreme S: 40% × 69.2 (est.) + 60% × 70.9 = 70
No road tests of comfort for Wintrac xtreme S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
| Source | AllSeasonContact | Wintrac xtreme S |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 21 / 1 tests | 61 | 72 |
| Reviews found online | ≈ 66 (est.) | ≈ 66 (est.) |
AllSeasonContact: 60% × 61.2 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 63
Wintrac xtreme S: 60% × 71.6 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 69
No owner ratings of noise for AllSeasonContact or Wintrac xtreme S. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
| Source | AllSeasonContact | Wintrac xtreme S |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / – tests | 71 | ≈ 65 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 65 | 62 |
AllSeasonContact: 60% × 70.9 + 40% × 64.5 = 68
Wintrac xtreme S: 60% × 64.8 (est.) + 40% × 61.8 = 64
No road tests of treadwear for Wintrac xtreme S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
| Source | AllSeasonContact | Wintrac xtreme S |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 72 | 73 |
| Source | AllSeasonContact | Wintrac xtreme S |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 20 / 1 tests | 88 | 65 |
| Category | Continental AllSeasonContact | Vredestein Wintrac xtreme S |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 74 | 70 |
| Dry | 68 | 69 |
| Wet | 83 | 75 |
| Snow | 82 | 67 |
| Comfort | 70 | 70 |
| Noise | 63 | 69 |
| Treadwear | 68 | 64 |
| Handling (owners) | 72 | 73 |
| Efficiency | 88 | 65 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
AllSeasonContact
Wintrac xtreme S
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | AllSeasonContact | Wintrac xtreme S | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 91% #5/7 · 2025 Quattroruote All-Season Tire Test R19 | 96% #5/10 · 2017 Auto Bild SUV Winter Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Dry Handling | Dry | 97% #9/11 · 2024 Sports Car All Season Tyre Test | 99% #8/10 · 2017 Auto Bild SUV Winter Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Straight Aquaplaning | Wet | 93% #4/7 · 2025 Quattroruote All-Season Tire Test R19 | 92% #6/10 · 2017 Auto Bild SUV Winter Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Braking | Wet | 100% #1/7 · 2025 Quattroruote All-Season Tire Test R19 | 100% #2/10 · 2017 Auto Bild SUV Winter Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Wet Handling | Wet | 97% #5/11 · 2024 Sports Car All Season Tyre Test | 100% #2/10 · 2017 Auto Bild SUV Winter Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Snow Braking | Snow | 96% #2/7 · 2025 Quattroruote All-Season Tire Test R19 | 96% #8/10 · 2017 Auto Bild SUV Winter Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Snow Handling | Snow | 98% #6/11 · 2024 Sports Car All Season Tyre Test | 94% #10/10 · 2017 Auto Bild SUV Winter Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Noise | Noise | 96% #11/11 · 2024 Sports Car All Season Tyre Test | 99% #3/10 · 2017 Auto Bild SUV Winter Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Rolling Resistance | Efficiency | 93% #6/11 · 2024 Sports Car All Season Tyre Test | 85% #8/10 · 2017 Auto Bild SUV Winter Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #3/7 2025 Quattroruote All-Season Tire Test R19 | #27/45 2017 50 Winter Tyre Shoot Out | – | Different tests |
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Community opinion on the Continental AllSeasonContact is generally positive regarding its winter and wet weather performance, but mixed when it comes to noise, ride harshness, and wear characteristics. Users appreciate its strong snow and rain capabilities compared to competitors, though some note drawbacks such as increased road noise or stiffness over time, particularly for XL-rated variants. Additionally, availability is primarily focused in Europe, making it a well-regarded option overseas while being largely absent in North America.
“Originally Posted By: UG_Passat .... Nexen beats out Michelin, Continental, Goodyear and Nokian Surprise loser, is Michelin. Test winner: Nexen N blue 4 Season To solve the goal conflicts succeeds in the test the Nexen N blue 4 Season best. With good performances on wet and ice, the Korean tire on dry and snow-covered road is a bit weaker, but still acceptable. The new AllSeasonContact from Conti , on the other hand, solves the classic conflict of objectives of wetness vs. Snow very well - but at the expense of performance on dry roads. On dry land, the next-ranked Goodyear Vector 4Seasons Gen-2 and Nokian Wheatherproof are also showing weaknesses. With the exception of the Firestone (worst dry and wet performance), all tires behind it ride on snow only below average - even the most expensive model in the test, the low- wear CrossClimate from Michelin LOL, I am waiting 25 years for ADAC to test tires after 20k. This is not first time ADAC has "surprise" winner.”
“Jeg har kørt udenmærket på dem på denne vej i min yaris, så længe jeg kører efter forholdene. Sad dog fast i dyb sne ved min indkørsel, som jeg burde have skovlet. Jeg skovlede den fri med 4-5 spader, og kørte så videre uden problemer. Ellers kun mistet grebet én gang på sort is med for meget fart. (kun slinger kørsel omrking 100m, fik kontrol igen). Edit: jeg ser lige at det er Continental AllSeasonContact jeg har, ikke 2.”
“Ai presupune ca au remediat sau imbunatatit ceva la allseason 2 dar exact acelasi tip de uzura am observat si eu la Continental Allseason Contact 1. Nu le-am luat din magazin, le-am luat de la cineva care pretinde ca au fost folosite maxim 2000km, aveau DOT sfarsit de 2022 si adancime profil 6.5-7mm. N-am fost atent daca erau asa de cand le-am luat poate daca observam le evitam, dar dupa nici 2 luni de folosire (sub 1000km) cand am verificat presiunea din roti cu o ocazie am observat si eu exact acelas tip de uzura. Am zis ca iau continental ca-s mai premium si n-am treaba multi ani, pentru ca si asa fac sub 6000km pe an. Daca stiam mai puneam cateva sute de lei si luam hankook sau nexen cu DOT 2024.”
Based on 15 community posts
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
| Attribute | A · Continental AllSeasonContact | B · Vredestein Wintrac xtreme S |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | Winter |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 108 | 13 |
| Rim diameters | 13″ – 20″ | 16″ – 22″ |
| Sizes in common | 7 | 7 |
Continental AllSeasonContact
Vredestein Wintrac xtreme S
Narrow edge: Continental AllSeasonContact — better efficiency, snow and wet. Pick the Vredestein Wintrac xtreme S if noise matters most to you. Vredestein Wintrac xtreme S rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 10 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Continental AllSeasonContact scores 88 vs 65 on efficiency.
Continental AllSeasonContact scores 82 vs 67 on snow.
Continental AllSeasonContact scores 83 vs 75 on wet.
Vredestein Wintrac xtreme S scores 69 vs 63 on noise.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Continental AllSeasonContact, 83 vs 75 on our wet score.
Neither, by our numbers: 68 vs 69 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Continental AllSeasonContact, 82 vs 67 on our snow score.
Vredestein Wintrac xtreme S, 69 vs 63 on our noise score.
Neither, by our numbers: 70 vs 70 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Continental AllSeasonContact, 68 vs 64 on our treadwear score.
Continental AllSeasonContact, 88 vs 65 on our efficiency score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology