Head-to-head Updated

Continental ContiCrossContact Winter vs Falken Sincera SN250 A/S — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.

ContiCrossContact Winter leads, 66–64 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 67

    Dry

    Sincera SN250 A/S +1
    68
    Why this score
    SourceContiCrossContact WinterSincera SN250 A/S
    Reviews found online6669
  2. 70

    Wet

    ContiCrossContact Winter +2
    68
    Why this score
    SourceContiCrossContact WinterSincera SN250 A/S
    Reviews found online7068
  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    57
    Why this score
    SourceContiCrossContact WinterSincera SN250 A/S
    Reviews found online–48
  4. 66

    Comfort

    ContiCrossContact Winter +7
    59
    Why this score
    SourceContiCrossContact WinterSincera SN250 A/S
    Reviews found online6350
  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    67
    Why this score
    SourceContiCrossContact WinterSincera SN250 A/S
    Reviews found online–68
  6. 61

    Treadwear

    Sincera SN250 A/S +1
    62
    Why this score
    SourceContiCrossContact WinterSincera SN250 A/S
    Reviews found online5760
  7. 66

    Handling

    ContiCrossContact Winter +7
    59
    Why this score
    SourceContiCrossContact WinterSincera SN250 A/S
    Reviews found online6659
Scores at a glance
Continental ContiCrossContact Winter vs Falken Sincera SN250 A/S: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental ContiCrossContact WinterFalken Sincera SN250 A/S
Relative Score 66 64
Dry 67 68
Wet 70 68
Snow – 57
Comfort 66 59
Noise – 67
Treadwear 61 62
Handling 66 59

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost

Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.

Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost

Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

ContiCrossContact Winter

Sincera SN250 A/S

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ContiCrossContact Winter

Pros

  • Exceptional traction and braking performance in snow conditions
  • Surprisingly quiet and stable on dry pavement
  • Strong grip during spirited driving on winding roads

Cons

  • Poor resistance to aquaplaning in wet conditions
  • Short tread life compared to premium competitors
  • Negative impact on fuel consumption
All owner themes in the ContiCrossContact Winter review

Tire B Sincera SN250 A/S

Pros

  • Exceptional value and competitive pricing compared to more expensive alternatives
  • Smooth, comfortable, and quiet ride quality
  • Good traction and grip in both dry and wet weather conditions

Cons

  • Some users reported disappointing tread life falling short of expectations
  • Occasional complaints regarding poor winter and snow traction
  • A few reports of sidewall bulges developing prematurely
All owner themes in the Sincera SN250 A/S review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental ContiCrossContact Winter B · Falken Sincera SN250 A/S
CategoryAll Season Touring tires—
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available—59
Rim diameters—14″ – 18″
Tread depth—11/32″
UTQG—720 A B
Treadwear warranty—80,000 mi
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—51 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental ContiCrossContact Winter

Falken Sincera SN250 A/S

Winner: Continental ContiCrossContact Winter — better comfort and handling. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Continental ContiCrossContact Winter scores 66 vs 59 on comfort.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Continental ContiCrossContact Winter scores 66 vs 59 on handling.

Tire A · Continental ContiCrossContact Winter
Tire B · Falken Sincera SN250 A/S

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.

66

Narrow edge

ContiCrossContact Winter

Amazon