Kumho Solus HS51 Harmony Sports looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Continental ContiSportContact 3 vs Kumho Solus HS51 Harmony Sports — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 16 + 5 owner reviews. How we score

Solus HS51 Harmony Sports is ahead, 67–61

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Kumho Solus HS51 Harmony Sports
Provisional

Tests 68 · 1 test Owners 67 · 5 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 10 in 2020 Teknikens 17 Inch Summer Tyre Test (straight aquaplaning)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 63

    Dry

    Solus HS51 Harmony Sports +3
    66
    Why this score
    SourceContiSportContact 3Solus HS51 Harmony Sports
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 65 (est.)65
    Reviews found online6166

    ContiSportContact 3: 60% × 65 (est.) + 40% × 61 = 63

    Solus HS51 Harmony Sports: 60% × 65.4 + 40% × 65.8 = 66

    No road tests of dry for ContiSportContact 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 65

    Wet

    Solus HS51 Harmony Sports +8
    73
    Why this score
    SourceContiSportContact 3Solus HS51 Harmony Sports
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 66 (est.)75
    Reviews found online6370

    ContiSportContact 3: 60% × 65.8 (est.) + 40% × 62.6 = 65

    Solus HS51 Harmony Sports: 60% × 75.3 + 40% × 70.4 = 73

    No road tests of wet for ContiSportContact 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 44

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceContiSportContact 3Solus HS51 Harmony Sports
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 56 (est.)–
    Reviews found online27–

    ContiSportContact 3: 60% × 55.8 (est.) + 40% × 27.2 = 44

    No road tests of snow for ContiSportContact 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 61

    Comfort

    ContiSportContact 3 +2
    59
    Why this score
    SourceContiSportContact 3Solus HS51 Harmony Sports
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 66 (est.)51
    Reviews found online5371

    ContiSportContact 3: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 52.6 = 61

    Solus HS51 Harmony Sports: 60% × 51 + 40% × 70.7 = 59

    No road tests of comfort for ContiSportContact 3. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 61

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceContiSportContact 3Solus HS51 Harmony Sports
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)–
    Reviews found online51–

    ContiSportContact 3: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 50.8 = 61

    No road tests of noise for ContiSportContact 3. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 56

    Treadwear

    Solus HS51 Harmony Sports +10
    66
    Why this score
    SourceContiSportContact 3Solus HS51 Harmony Sports
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 61 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online4966

    ContiSportContact 3: 60% × 60.6 (est.) + 40% × 49.4 = 56

    Solus HS51 Harmony Sports: 60% × 65.7 (est.) + 40% × 65.9 = 66

    No road tests of treadwear for ContiSportContact 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Solus HS51 Harmony Sports. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 55

    Handling (owners)

    Solus HS51 Harmony Sports +6
    61
    Why this score
    SourceContiSportContact 3Solus HS51 Harmony Sports
    Reviews found online5561
Scores at a glance
Continental ContiSportContact 3 vs Kumho Solus HS51 Harmony Sports: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental ContiSportContact 3Kumho Solus HS51 Harmony Sports
Relative Score 61 67
Dry 63 66
Wet 65 73
Snow 44 –
Comfort 61 59
Noise 61 –
Treadwear 56 66
Handling (owners) 55 61

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

ContiSportContact 3

Solus HS51 Harmony Sports

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ContiSportContact 3

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Tire B Solus HS51 Harmony Sports

Pros

  • High level of ride comfort and low noise levels
  • Excellent value for money compared to premium brands
  • Strong wet weather performance

Cons

  • Excessive sidewall softness leading to a 'wobbling' or unstable sensation
  • Noticeable decline in grip levels before the tread is fully worn
  • Inconsistent handling performance depending on axle placement
All owner themes in the Solus HS51 Harmony Sports review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental ContiSportContact 3 B · Kumho Solus HS51 Harmony Sports
CategorySummer tireSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available22—
Rim diameters16″ – 20″—
Tread depth9 - 10/32″—
UTQG280 A - B A—
SidewallBlack Side Wall—
Max pressure50 - 51 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental ContiSportContact 3

Kumho Solus HS51 Harmony Sports

Winner: Kumho Solus HS51 Harmony Sports — better treadwear, wet and handling. Where the Continental ContiSportContact 3 is ahead, it is by less than 3 points. Continental ContiSportContact 3 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 16 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Kumho Solus HS51 Harmony Sports rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 5 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Kumho Solus HS51 Harmony Sports scores 66 vs 56 on treadwear.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Kumho Solus HS51 Harmony Sports scores 73 vs 65 on wet.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Kumho Solus HS51 Harmony Sports scores 61 vs 55 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Kumho Solus HS51 Harmony Sports scores 66 vs 63 on dry.

Tire A · Continental ContiSportContact 3
Tire B · Kumho Solus HS51 Harmony Sports

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

ContiSportContact 3 or Solus HS51 Harmony Sports?

Which is better in the wet, ContiSportContact 3 or Solus HS51 Harmony Sports?

Kumho Solus HS51 Harmony Sports, 73 vs 65 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, ContiSportContact 3 or Solus HS51 Harmony Sports?

Kumho Solus HS51 Harmony Sports, 66 vs 63 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, ContiSportContact 3 or Solus HS51 Harmony Sports?

Neither, by our numbers: 61 vs 59 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, ContiSportContact 3 or Solus HS51 Harmony Sports?

Kumho Solus HS51 Harmony Sports, 66 vs 56 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology