Tests – · none yet Owners 44 · 14 reviews
Continental ContiSportContact 5 SSR vs Nexen N Fera SU1 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 3 road tests and 14 + 164 owner reviews. How we score
N Fera SU1 is ahead, 63–54
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 63 · 3 tests Owners 63 · 164 reviews
Best test result: #6 of 22 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires (tested tread life (miles))
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
56
Dry
N Fera SU1 +359Why this score
Source ContiSportContact 5 SSR N Fera SU1 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests ≈ 60 (est.) 55 Reviews found online 50 65 ContiSportContact 5 SSR: 60% × 60.4 (est.) + 40% × 49.5 = 56
N Fera SU1: 60% × 55 + 40% × 64.7 = 59
No road tests of dry for ContiSportContact 5 SSR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
59
Wet
N Fera SU1 +564Why this score
Source ContiSportContact 5 SSR N Fera SU1 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests ≈ 62 (est.) 62 Reviews found online 56 68 ContiSportContact 5 SSR: 60% × 61.8 (est.) + 40% × 55.6 = 59
N Fera SU1: 60% × 61.9 + 40% × 67.6 = 64
No road tests of wet for ContiSportContact 5 SSR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
53
Snow
N Fera SU1 +558Why this score
Source ContiSportContact 5 SSR N Fera SU1 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 61 (est.) ≈ 63 (est.) Reviews found online 42 49 ContiSportContact 5 SSR: 60% × 60.6 (est.) + 40% × 41.9 = 53
N Fera SU1: 60% × 63 (est.) + 40% × 49.2 = 58
No road tests of snow for ContiSportContact 5 SSR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
No road tests of snow for N Fera SU1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
52
Comfort
N Fera SU1 +1466Why this score
Source ContiSportContact 5 SSR N Fera SU1 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests ≈ 63 (est.) 66 Reviews found online 34 67 ContiSportContact 5 SSR: 60% × 63.1 (est.) + 40% × 34.3 = 52
N Fera SU1: 60% × 65.7 + 40% × 66.6 = 66
No road tests of comfort for ContiSportContact 5 SSR. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
59
Noise
N Fera SU1 +1170Why this score
Source ContiSportContact 5 SSR N Fera SU1 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 67 (est.) 69 Reviews found online 47 70 ContiSportContact 5 SSR: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 46.9 = 59
N Fera SU1: 60% × 69.3 + 40% × 70 = 70
No road tests of noise for ContiSportContact 5 SSR. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
46
Treadwear
N Fera SU1 +2167Why this score
Source ContiSportContact 5 SSR N Fera SU1 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 55 (est.) 70 Reviews found online 31 61 ContiSportContact 5 SSR: 60% × 55.1 (est.) + 40% × 31.4 = 46
N Fera SU1: 60% × 70.2 + 40% × 61.4 = 67
No road tests of treadwear for ContiSportContact 5 SSR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
42
Handling (owners)
N Fera SU1 +2466Why this score
Source ContiSportContact 5 SSR N Fera SU1 Reviews found online 42 66
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ContiSportContact 5 SSR | Nexen N Fera SU1 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 54 | 63 |
| Dry | 56 | 59 |
| Wet | 59 | 64 |
| Snow | 53 | 58 |
| Comfort | 52 | 66 |
| Noise | 59 | 70 |
| Treadwear | 46 | 67 |
| Handling (owners) | 42 | 66 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
ContiSportContact 5 SSR
N Fera SU1
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ContiSportContact 5 SSR
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Tire B N Fera SU1
Pros
- Exceptional value and significantly lower price compared to premium brands
- Remarkably quiet ride and high overall comfort
- Strong dry and wet grip for daily commuting and spirited driving
Cons
- Soft sidewalls can cause vague handling, body roll, or a floating sensation on heavier vehicles
- Faster than average tread wear or inconsistent durability for some users
- Reports of rubber cracking or splitting along the sidewalls and tread blocks over time
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ContiSportContact 5 SSR | B · Nexen N Fera SU1 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer tire | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 25 | 97 |
| Rim diameters | 17″ – 20″ | 15″ – 24″ |
| Tread depth | 9/32″ | 9/32″ |
| UTQG | 280 - 420 A - AA A | 300 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 25,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 50 - 51 psi | 51 psi |
| Sizes in common | 18 | 18 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental ContiSportContact 5 SSR
Nexen N Fera SU1
Winner: Nexen N Fera SU1 — better handling, treadwear and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score. Continental ContiSportContact 5 SSR rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 14 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Nexen N Fera SU1 scores 66 vs 42 on handling.
Nexen N Fera SU1 scores 67 vs 46 on treadwear.
Nexen N Fera SU1 scores 66 vs 52 on comfort.
Nexen N Fera SU1 scores 70 vs 59 on noise.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
ContiSportContact 5 SSR or N Fera SU1?
Which is better in the wet, ContiSportContact 5 SSR or N Fera SU1?
Nexen N Fera SU1, 64 vs 59 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, ContiSportContact 5 SSR or N Fera SU1?
Nexen N Fera SU1, 59 vs 56 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, ContiSportContact 5 SSR or N Fera SU1?
Nexen N Fera SU1, 58 vs 53 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, ContiSportContact 5 SSR or N Fera SU1?
Nexen N Fera SU1, 70 vs 59 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, ContiSportContact 5 SSR or N Fera SU1?
Nexen N Fera SU1, 66 vs 52 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, ContiSportContact 5 SSR or N Fera SU1?
Nexen N Fera SU1, 67 vs 46 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology