tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Continental ContiSportContact 5 vs Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 27 + 60 owner reviews. How we score

BluEarth Es ES32 is ahead, 71–66

Check price on Amazon · BluEarth Es ES32 or ContiSportContact 5 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 67

    Dry

    BluEarth Es ES32 +3
    70
    Why this score
    SourceContiSportContact 5BluEarth Es ES32
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online6771

    ContiSportContact 5: 60% × 67.6 (est.) + 40% × 66.9 = 67

    BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 69.5 (est.) + 40% × 71.4 = 70

    No road tests of dry for ContiSportContact 5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

    No road tests of dry for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 72

    Wet

    BluEarth Es ES32 +2
    74
    Why this score
    SourceContiSportContact 5BluEarth Es ES32
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 73 (est.)
    Reviews found online7275

    ContiSportContact 5: 60% × 71.4 (est.) + 40% × 71.9 = 72

    BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 72.9 (est.) + 40% × 74.7 = 74

    No road tests of wet for ContiSportContact 5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 69

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceContiSportContact 5BluEarth Es ES32
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)–
    Reviews found online68–

    ContiSportContact 5: 60% × 69.6 (est.) + 40% × 67.5 = 69

    No road tests of snow for ContiSportContact 5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 64

    Comfort

    BluEarth Es ES32 +9
    73
    Why this score
    SourceContiSportContact 5BluEarth Es ES32
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online6275

    ContiSportContact 5: 40% × 67.8 (est.) + 60% × 62.1 = 64

    BluEarth Es ES32: 40% × 70.2 (est.) + 60% × 74.7 = 73

    No road tests of comfort for ContiSportContact 5 or BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 70

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceContiSportContact 5BluEarth Es ES32
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)–
    Reviews found online75–

    ContiSportContact 5: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 75 = 70

    No road tests of noise for ContiSportContact 5. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 56

    Treadwear

    BluEarth Es ES32 +9
    65
    Why this score
    SourceContiSportContact 5BluEarth Es ES32
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 61 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online5065

    ContiSportContact 5: 60% × 60.5 (est.) + 40% × 50.1 = 56

    BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 65.6 (est.) + 40% × 64.7 = 65

    No road tests of treadwear for ContiSportContact 5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

    No road tests of treadwear for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. –

    Handling (owners)

    No comparison
    75
    Why this score
    SourceContiSportContact 5BluEarth Es ES32
    Reviews found online–75
Scores at a glance
CategoryContinental ContiSportContact 5Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
Relative Score 66 71
Dry 67 70
Wet 72 74
Snow 69 –
Comfort 64 73
Noise 70 –
Treadwear 56 65
Handling (owners) – 75

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

ContiSportContact 5

± 8

BluEarth Es ES32

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ContiSportContact 5

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Tire B BluEarth Es ES32

Pros

  • Exceptional ride comfort and noise reduction
  • Strong value proposition compared to premium brands
  • Reliable dry-weather traction and handling

Cons

  • Wet-weather grip can become unpredictable as tread depth decreases
  • Inconsistent tread life, with some users reporting premature wear
  • Sidewalls may be susceptible to damage from severe potholes
All owner themes in the BluEarth Es ES32 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental ContiSportContact 5 B · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
CategorySummer tireSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available8664
Rim diameters17″ – 22″13″ – 18″
Tread depth8 - 10/32″—
UTQG280 - 420 A - AA A—
SidewallBlack Side Wall—
Max pressure50 - 51 psi—
Sizes in common1313

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental ContiSportContact 5

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32

Winner: Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — better comfort, treadwear and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 73 vs 64 on comfort.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 65 vs 56 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 70 vs 67 on dry.

Tire A · Continental ContiSportContact 5
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

ContiSportContact 5 or BluEarth Es ES32?

Which is better in the wet, ContiSportContact 5 or BluEarth Es ES32?

Neither, by our numbers: 72 vs 74 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, ContiSportContact 5 or BluEarth Es ES32?

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32, 70 vs 67 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, ContiSportContact 5 or BluEarth Es ES32?

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32, 73 vs 64 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, ContiSportContact 5 or BluEarth Es ES32?

Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32, 65 vs 56 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology