Tests – · none yet Owners 59 · 37 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Yokohama Advan dB V552 vs Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
BluEarth Es ES32 is ahead, 70–62
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 70 · 60 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
60
Dry
BluEarth Es ES32 +969Why this score
Source Advan dB V552 BluEarth Es ES32 Reviews found online 56 70 -
64
Wet
BluEarth Es ES32 +872Why this score
Source Advan dB V552 BluEarth Es ES32 Reviews found online 61 73 -
68
Comfort
BluEarth Es ES32 +472Why this score
Source Advan dB V552 BluEarth Es ES32 Reviews found online 67 74 -
60
Treadwear
BluEarth Es ES32 +565Why this score
Source Advan dB V552 BluEarth Es ES32 Reviews found online 56 65 -
60
Handling
BluEarth Es ES32 +1373Why this score
Source Advan dB V552 BluEarth Es ES32 Reviews found online 60 73
Scores at a glance
| Category | Yokohama Advan dB V552 | Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 62 | 70 |
| Dry | 60 | 69 |
| Wet | 64 | 72 |
| Comfort | 68 | 72 |
| Treadwear | 60 | 65 |
| Handling | 60 | 73 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
62
/ 100
Advan dB V552
70
/ 100
BluEarth Es ES32
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Advan dB V552
Pros
- Exceptionally quiet and silent operation at various speeds
- High level of ride comfort, effectively absorbing bumps and potholes
- Good grip and sure-footed performance in wet conditions
Cons
- Softer sidewalls can cause a floating sensation or lack of sharpness at higher speeds
- Reduced dry cornering grip when pushed hard, with some tendency to wash out
- Mixed feedback on overall durability, with a few users experiencing faster-than-expected wear
Tire B BluEarth Es ES32
Pros
- Exceptional ride comfort and noise reduction
- Strong value proposition compared to premium brands
- Reliable dry-weather traction and handling
Cons
- Wet-weather grip can become unpredictable as tread depth decreases
- Inconsistent tread life, with some users reporting premature wear
- Sidewalls may be susceptible to damage from severe potholes
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Yokohama Advan dB V552 | B · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 45 | 64 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 21″ | 13″ – 18″ |
Which one should you actually buy?
62
/ 100
Yokohama Advan dB V552
70
/ 100
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
Winner: Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — better handling, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 73 vs 60 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 69 vs 60 on dry.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 72 vs 64 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 65 vs 60 on treadwear.
Tire A · Yokohama Advan dB V552
Tire B · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.