Tests – · none yet Owners 56 · 37 reviews
Yokohama Advan dB V552 vs Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 37 + 63 owner reviews. How we score
BluEarth Es ES32 is ahead, 72–60
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 73 · 63 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
59
Dry
BluEarth Es ES32 +1271Why this score
Source Advan dB V552 BluEarth Es ES32 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 62 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 54 73 Advan dB V552: 60% × 62 (est.) + 40% × 53.5 = 59
BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 72.9 = 71
No road tests of dry for Advan dB V552. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
63
Wet
BluEarth Es ES32 +1275Why this score
Source Advan dB V552 BluEarth Es ES32 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 74 (est.) Reviews found online 60 76 Advan dB V552: 60% × 64.6 (est.) + 40% × 59.5 = 63
BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 73.7 (est.) + 40% × 76.2 = 75
No road tests of wet for Advan dB V552. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
65
Comfort
BluEarth Es ES32 +974Why this score
Source Advan dB V552 BluEarth Es ES32 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 64 76 Advan dB V552: 40% × 67.7 (est.) + 60% × 63.7 = 65
BluEarth Es ES32: 40% × 70.1 (est.) + 60% × 75.8 = 74
No road tests of comfort for Advan dB V552. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
57
Treadwear
BluEarth Es ES32 +1067Why this score
Source Advan dB V552 BluEarth Es ES32 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 61 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 52 67 Advan dB V552: 60% × 61.2 (est.) + 40% × 51.8 = 57
BluEarth Es ES32: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 66.5 = 67
No road tests of treadwear for Advan dB V552. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for BluEarth Es ES32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
57
Handling (owners)
BluEarth Es ES32 +2077Why this score
Source Advan dB V552 BluEarth Es ES32 Reviews found online 57 77
Scores at a glance
| Category | Yokohama Advan dB V552 | Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 60 | 72 |
| Dry | 59 | 71 |
| Wet | 63 | 75 |
| Comfort | 65 | 74 |
| Treadwear | 57 | 67 |
| Handling (owners) | 57 | 77 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Advan dB V552
BluEarth Es ES32
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Advan dB V552
Pros
- Exceptionally quiet and silent operation at various speeds
- High level of ride comfort, effectively absorbing bumps and potholes
- Good grip and sure-footed performance in wet conditions
Cons
- Softer sidewalls can cause a floating sensation or lack of sharpness at higher speeds
- Reduced dry cornering grip when pushed hard, with some tendency to wash out
- Mixed feedback on overall durability, with a few users experiencing faster-than-expected wear
Tire B BluEarth Es ES32
Pros
- Exceptional ride comfort and smoothness over bumps
- Noticeably low road noise and quiet operation
- Strong value for money compared to premium brands
Cons
- Faster-than-average tread wear reported by some drivers
- Diminished wet weather grip and increased skidding risk as the tread wears down
- Not suited for high-performance driving or aggressive cornering
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Yokohama Advan dB V552 | B · Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 45 | 64 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 21″ | 13″ – 18″ |
| Sizes in common | 17 | 17 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Yokohama Advan dB V552
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32
Winner: Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 — better handling, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 77 vs 57 on handling.
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 71 vs 59 on dry.
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 75 vs 63 on wet.
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32 scores 67 vs 57 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Advan dB V552 or BluEarth Es ES32?
Which is better in the wet, Advan dB V552 or BluEarth Es ES32?
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32, 75 vs 63 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Advan dB V552 or BluEarth Es ES32?
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32, 71 vs 59 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Advan dB V552 or BluEarth Es ES32?
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32, 74 vs 65 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Advan dB V552 or BluEarth Es ES32?
Yokohama BluEarth Es ES32, 67 vs 57 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology