Tests – · 1 test Owners 72 · 104 reviews
Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 vs Falken EuroWinter HS449 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 104 + 42 owner reviews. How we score
ExtremeContact DWS 06 leads, 73–71 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 70 · 42 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
76
Dry
ExtremeContact DWS 06 +868Why this score
Source ExtremeContact DWS 06 EuroWinter HS449 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 73 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 80 68 ExtremeContact DWS 06: 60% × 72.9 (est.) + 40% × 79.5 = 76
EuroWinter HS449: 60% × 68.2 (est.) + 40% × 68.3 = 68
No road tests of dry for ExtremeContact DWS 06. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for EuroWinter HS449. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
79
Wet
ExtremeContact DWS 06 +178Why this score
Source ExtremeContact DWS 06 EuroWinter HS449 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 77 (est.) ≈ 76 (est.) Reviews found online 83 81 ExtremeContact DWS 06: 60% × 77.3 (est.) + 40% × 82.5 = 79
EuroWinter HS449: 60% × 76.2 (est.) + 40% × 80.6 = 78
No road tests of wet for ExtremeContact DWS 06. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for EuroWinter HS449. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
68
Snow
EuroWinter HS449 +371Why this score
Source ExtremeContact DWS 06 EuroWinter HS449 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 71 (est.) Reviews found online 66 72 ExtremeContact DWS 06: 60% × 69 (est.) + 40% × 65.9 = 68
EuroWinter HS449: 60% × 71.2 (est.) + 40% × 71.8 = 71
No road tests of snow for ExtremeContact DWS 06. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
No road tests of snow for EuroWinter HS449. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
-
68
Comfort
EuroWinter HS449 +371Why this score
Source ExtremeContact DWS 06 EuroWinter HS449 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 67 71 ExtremeContact DWS 06: 40% × 68.7 (est.) + 60% × 67 = 68
EuroWinter HS449: 40% × 69.5 (est.) + 60% × 71.2 = 71
No road tests of comfort for ExtremeContact DWS 06 or EuroWinter HS449. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
70
Noise
ExtremeContact DWS 06 +961Why this score
Source ExtremeContact DWS 06 EuroWinter HS449 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 74 52 ExtremeContact DWS 06: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 73.9 = 70
EuroWinter HS449: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 52.3 = 61
No road tests of noise for ExtremeContact DWS 06 or EuroWinter HS449. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
65
Treadwear
EuroWinter HS449 +166Why this score
Source ExtremeContact DWS 06 EuroWinter HS449 Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests 70 ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 58 65 ExtremeContact DWS 06: 60% × 69.8 + 40% × 58.4 = 65
EuroWinter HS449: 60% × 65.8 (est.) + 40% × 65.3 = 66
No road tests of treadwear for EuroWinter HS449. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
76
Handling (owners)
ExtremeContact DWS 06 +472Why this score
Source ExtremeContact DWS 06 EuroWinter HS449 Reviews found online 76 72
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 | Falken EuroWinter HS449 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 73 | 71 |
| Dry | 76 | 68 |
| Wet | 79 | 78 |
| Snow | 68 | 71 |
| Comfort | 68 | 71 |
| Noise | 70 | 61 |
| Treadwear | 65 | 66 |
| Handling (owners) | 76 | 72 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
ExtremeContact DWS 06
EuroWinter HS449
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | ExtremeContact DWS 06 | EuroWinter HS449 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #6/19 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance All-Season Tires | #9/17 2020 Consumer Reports North America Winter Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ExtremeContact DWS 06
Pros
- Exceptional wet and dry traction
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Strong performance in light snow and cold weather
Cons
- Softer sidewalls can reduce steering sharpness or cause rollover during heavy track/autocross use
- Tread wear can be faster than expected with aggressive driving or on lower-profile sizes
- Occasional reports of increased road noise or vibration as the tire ages
Tire B EuroWinter HS449
Pros
- Exceptional grip and traction in deep snow, slush, and ice
- Strong value for money compared to premium brand winter tires
- Reliable and safe performance on wet and rainy roads with good hydroplaning resistance
Cons
- Faster tread wear or a softer rubber compound noted by some users
- Slightly reduced fuel economy or rolling resistance penalty
- Occasional reports of decreased grip or wheel spin on steep inclines and packed ice for certain 2WD setups
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 | B · Falken EuroWinter HS449 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | Winter |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 6 |
| Rim diameters | — | 16″ – 19″ |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | 11/32″ |
| UTQG | 560 A - AA A | — |
| Treadwear warranty | 50,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | 44 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06
Falken EuroWinter HS449
Narrow edge: Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 — better noise and dry. Pick the Falken EuroWinter HS449 if snow and comfort matter most to you.
Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 scores 70 vs 61 on noise.
Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 scores 76 vs 68 on dry.
Falken EuroWinter HS449 scores 71 vs 68 on snow.
Falken EuroWinter HS449 scores 71 vs 68 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
ExtremeContact DWS 06 or EuroWinter HS449?
Which is better in the wet, ExtremeContact DWS 06 or EuroWinter HS449?
Neither, by our numbers: 79 vs 78 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, ExtremeContact DWS 06 or EuroWinter HS449?
Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06, 76 vs 68 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, ExtremeContact DWS 06 or EuroWinter HS449?
Falken EuroWinter HS449, 71 vs 68 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, ExtremeContact DWS 06 or EuroWinter HS449?
Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06, 70 vs 61 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, ExtremeContact DWS 06 or EuroWinter HS449?
Falken EuroWinter HS449, 71 vs 68 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, ExtremeContact DWS 06 or EuroWinter HS449?
Neither, by our numbers: 65 vs 66 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology