tirewheelguide

Falken FK451 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 vs Falken FK451 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 104 + 10 owner reviews. How we score

ExtremeContact DWS 06 is ahead, 73–68

Check price on Amazon · ExtremeContact DWS 06 or FK451 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Falken FK451
Tire BFalken

FK451

Summer

Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 67 · 10 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 74

    Dry

    ExtremeContact DWS 06 +8
    66
    Why this score
    SourceExtremeContact DWS 06FK451
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 72 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online7865

    ExtremeContact DWS 06: 60% × 71.9 (est.) + 40% × 78.2 = 74

    FK451: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 64.9 = 66

    No road tests of dry for ExtremeContact DWS 06. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for FK451. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 77

    Wet

    ExtremeContact DWS 06 +7
    70
    Why this score
    SourceExtremeContact DWS 06FK451
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 75 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online7970

    ExtremeContact DWS 06: 60% × 75.2 (est.) + 40% × 79.4 = 77

    FK451: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 70.2 = 70

    No road tests of wet for ExtremeContact DWS 06. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for FK451. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 67

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceExtremeContact DWS 06FK451
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)–
    Reviews found online64–

    ExtremeContact DWS 06: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 64.4 = 67

    No road tests of snow for ExtremeContact DWS 06. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 69

    Comfort

    ExtremeContact DWS 06 +1
    68
    Why this score
    SourceExtremeContact DWS 06FK451
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online6867

    ExtremeContact DWS 06: 60% × 68.9 (est.) + 40% × 68 = 69

    FK451: 60% × 68.8 (est.) + 40% × 67.4 = 68

    No road tests of comfort for ExtremeContact DWS 06 or FK451. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 70

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceExtremeContact DWS 06FK451
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)–
    Reviews found online73–

    ExtremeContact DWS 06: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 72.9 = 70

    No road tests of noise for ExtremeContact DWS 06. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 66

    Treadwear

    FK451 +1
    67
    Why this score
    SourceExtremeContact DWS 06FK451
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests70≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online6168

    ExtremeContact DWS 06: 60% × 69.8 + 40% × 60.5 = 66

    FK451: 60% × 66.2 (est.) + 40% × 67.5 = 67

    No road tests of treadwear for FK451. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 74

    Handling (owners)

    ExtremeContact DWS 06 +9
    65
    Why this score
    SourceExtremeContact DWS 06FK451
    Reviews found online7465
Scores at a glance
CategoryContinental ExtremeContact DWS 06Falken FK451
Relative Score 73 68
Dry 74 66
Wet 77 70
Snow 67 –
Comfort 69 68
Noise 70 –
Treadwear 66 67
Handling (owners) 74 65

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

ExtremeContact DWS 06

FK451

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ExtremeContact DWS 06

Pros

  • Exceptional wet and dry traction
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality
  • Strong performance in light snow and cold weather

Cons

  • Softer sidewalls can reduce steering sharpness or cause rollover during heavy track/autocross use
  • Tread wear can be faster than expected with aggressive driving or on lower-profile sizes
  • Occasional reports of increased road noise or vibration as the tire ages
All owner themes in the ExtremeContact DWS 06 review

Tire B FK451

Pros

  • Exceptional price-to-performance ratio
  • Strong wet and dry traction
  • Excellent tread life and durability

Cons

  • Potential for rubber cracking between treads over long-term storage or extended age
  • Some users report a slightly less 'alive' or communicative steering feel compared to premium performance tires
  • Availability concerns as it is an older model often superseded by newer iterations
All owner themes in the FK451 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 B · Falken FK451
CategoryAll SeasonSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Tread depth10/32″—
UTQG560 A - AA A—
Treadwear warranty50,000 mi—
SidewallBlack Side Wall—
Max pressure51 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06

Falken FK451

Winner: Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 — better handling, dry and wet. Where the Falken FK451 is ahead, it is by less than 3 points. Falken FK451 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 10 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 scores 74 vs 65 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 scores 74 vs 66 on dry.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 scores 77 vs 70 on wet.

Tire A · Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Falken FK451
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

ExtremeContact DWS 06 or FK451?

Which is better in the wet, ExtremeContact DWS 06 or FK451?

Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06, 77 vs 70 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, ExtremeContact DWS 06 or FK451?

Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06, 74 vs 66 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, ExtremeContact DWS 06 or FK451?

Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 68 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, ExtremeContact DWS 06 or FK451?

Neither, by our numbers: 66 vs 67 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology