Tests – · 1 test Owners 71 · 104 reviews
General AltiMAX RT looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 vs General AltiMAX RT — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 104 + 11 owner reviews. How we score
ExtremeContact DWS 06 is ahead, 72–65
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 63 · 11 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
74
Dry
ExtremeContact DWS 06 +965Why this score
Source ExtremeContact DWS 06 AltiMAX RT Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 72 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 78 64 ExtremeContact DWS 06: 60% × 71.9 (est.) + 40% × 78.2 = 74
AltiMAX RT: 60% × 66.1 (est.) + 40% × 63.7 = 65
No road tests of dry for ExtremeContact DWS 06. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for AltiMAX RT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
77
Wet
ExtremeContact DWS 06 +1067Why this score
Source ExtremeContact DWS 06 AltiMAX RT Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 75 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 79 66 ExtremeContact DWS 06: 60% × 75.2 (est.) + 40% × 79.4 = 77
AltiMAX RT: 60% × 67.7 (est.) + 40% × 66 = 67
No road tests of wet for ExtremeContact DWS 06. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for AltiMAX RT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
67
Snow
ExtremeContact DWS 06 +661Why this score
Source ExtremeContact DWS 06 AltiMAX RT Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 64 55 ExtremeContact DWS 06: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 64.4 = 67
AltiMAX RT: 60% × 65 (est.) + 40% × 55 = 61
No road tests of snow for ExtremeContact DWS 06. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
No road tests of snow for AltiMAX RT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
69
Comfort
ExtremeContact DWS 06 +465Why this score
Source ExtremeContact DWS 06 AltiMAX RT Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 68 62 ExtremeContact DWS 06: 60% × 68.9 (est.) + 40% × 68 = 69
AltiMAX RT: 60% × 67.8 (est.) + 40% × 61.5 = 65
No road tests of comfort for ExtremeContact DWS 06 or AltiMAX RT. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
70
Noise
ExtremeContact DWS 06 +466Why this score
Source ExtremeContact DWS 06 AltiMAX RT Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 73 65 ExtremeContact DWS 06: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 72.9 = 70
AltiMAX RT: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 64.8 = 66
No road tests of noise for ExtremeContact DWS 06 or AltiMAX RT. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
66
Treadwear
ExtremeContact DWS 06 +165Why this score
Source ExtremeContact DWS 06 AltiMAX RT Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests 70 ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 61 64 ExtremeContact DWS 06: 60% × 69.8 + 40% × 60.5 = 66
AltiMAX RT: 60% × 65.1 (est.) + 40% × 63.8 = 65
No road tests of treadwear for AltiMAX RT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
74
Handling (owners)
ExtremeContact DWS 06 +1064Why this score
Source ExtremeContact DWS 06 AltiMAX RT Reviews found online 74 64
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 | General AltiMAX RT |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 72 | 65 |
| Dry | 74 | 65 |
| Wet | 77 | 67 |
| Snow | 67 | 61 |
| Comfort | 69 | 65 |
| Noise | 70 | 66 |
| Treadwear | 66 | 65 |
| Handling (owners) | 74 | 64 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
ExtremeContact DWS 06
AltiMAX RT
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ExtremeContact DWS 06
Pros
- Exceptional wet and dry traction
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Strong performance in light snow and cold weather
Cons
- Softer sidewalls can reduce steering sharpness or cause rollover during heavy track/autocross use
- Tread wear can be faster than expected with aggressive driving or on lower-profile sizes
- Occasional reports of increased road noise or vibration as the tire ages
Tire B AltiMAX RT
Pros
- Affordable price point offering high value
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality suitable for large sedans
- Reliable all-around traction in both wet and dry conditions
Cons
- Subpar wet-weather performance reported by some users
- Premature tread wear down to 30,000 miles in isolated experiences
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 | B · General AltiMAX RT |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | All-Season Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | 10/32″ |
| UTQG | 560 A - AA A | 440 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | 50,000 mi | 70,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | 44 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06
General AltiMAX RT
Winner: Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 — better wet, handling and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. General AltiMAX RT rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 11 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 scores 77 vs 67 on wet.
Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 scores 74 vs 64 on handling.
Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 scores 74 vs 65 on dry.
Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 scores 67 vs 61 on snow.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
ExtremeContact DWS 06 or AltiMAX RT?
Which is better in the wet, ExtremeContact DWS 06 or AltiMAX RT?
Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06, 77 vs 67 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, ExtremeContact DWS 06 or AltiMAX RT?
Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06, 74 vs 65 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, ExtremeContact DWS 06 or AltiMAX RT?
Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06, 67 vs 61 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, ExtremeContact DWS 06 or AltiMAX RT?
Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06, 70 vs 66 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, ExtremeContact DWS 06 or AltiMAX RT?
Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06, 69 vs 65 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, ExtremeContact DWS 06 or AltiMAX RT?
Neither, by our numbers: 66 vs 65 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology