Tests – · 1 test Owners 71 · 104 reviews
Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 vs Kumho Sense KR26 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 104 + 11 owner reviews. How we score
ExtremeContact DWS 06 is ahead, 72–47
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 37 · 11 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
74
Dry
ExtremeContact DWS 06 +2747Why this score
Source ExtremeContact DWS 06 Sense KR26 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 72 (est.) ≈ 55 (est.) Reviews found online 78 35 ExtremeContact DWS 06: 60% × 71.9 (est.) + 40% × 78.2 = 74
Sense KR26: 60% × 54.6 (est.) + 40% × 35 = 47
No road tests of dry for ExtremeContact DWS 06. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for Sense KR26. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
77
Wet
ExtremeContact DWS 06 +3740Why this score
Source ExtremeContact DWS 06 Sense KR26 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 75 (est.) ≈ 47 (est.) Reviews found online 79 29 ExtremeContact DWS 06: 60% × 75.2 (est.) + 40% × 79.4 = 77
Sense KR26: 60% × 46.8 (est.) + 40% × 28.8 = 40
No road tests of wet for ExtremeContact DWS 06. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for Sense KR26. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
67
Snow
ExtremeContact DWS 06 +2542Why this score
Source ExtremeContact DWS 06 Sense KR26 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 55 (est.) Reviews found online 64 24 ExtremeContact DWS 06: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 64.4 = 67
Sense KR26: 60% × 54.7 (est.) + 40% × 24 = 42
No road tests of snow for ExtremeContact DWS 06. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
No road tests of snow for Sense KR26. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
69
Comfort
ExtremeContact DWS 06 +1554Why this score
Source ExtremeContact DWS 06 Sense KR26 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 68 40 ExtremeContact DWS 06: 60% × 68.9 (est.) + 40% × 68 = 69
Sense KR26: 60% × 64.1 (est.) + 40% × 39.8 = 54
No road tests of comfort for ExtremeContact DWS 06 or Sense KR26. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
70
Noise
ExtremeContact DWS 06 +1060Why this score
Source ExtremeContact DWS 06 Sense KR26 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 73 48 ExtremeContact DWS 06: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 72.9 = 70
Sense KR26: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 47.9 = 60
No road tests of noise for ExtremeContact DWS 06 or Sense KR26. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
66
Treadwear
ExtremeContact DWS 06 +1254Why this score
Source ExtremeContact DWS 06 Sense KR26 Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests 70 ≈ 60 (est.) Reviews found online 61 46 ExtremeContact DWS 06: 60% × 69.8 + 40% × 60.5 = 66
Sense KR26: 60% × 59.6 (est.) + 40% × 45.9 = 54
No road tests of treadwear for Sense KR26. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
74
Handling (owners)
ExtremeContact DWS 06 +2846Why this score
Source ExtremeContact DWS 06 Sense KR26 Reviews found online 74 46
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 | Kumho Sense KR26 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 72 | 47 |
| Dry | 74 | 47 |
| Wet | 77 | 40 |
| Snow | 67 | 42 |
| Comfort | 69 | 54 |
| Noise | 70 | 60 |
| Treadwear | 66 | 54 |
| Handling (owners) | 74 | 46 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
ExtremeContact DWS 06
Sense KR26
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ExtremeContact DWS 06
Pros
- Exceptional wet and dry traction
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Strong performance in light snow and cold weather
Cons
- Softer sidewalls can reduce steering sharpness or cause rollover during heavy track/autocross use
- Tread wear can be faster than expected with aggressive driving or on lower-profile sizes
- Occasional reports of increased road noise or vibration as the tire ages
Tire B Sense KR26
Pros
- Affordable price point appealing to budget-conscious drivers
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Smooth and pleasant driving dynamics when new
Cons
- Rapid degradation of wet-weather traction after 15,000 to 25,000 miles
- Uneven tread wear and balancing issues at higher mileage
- Poor dry and wet grip reported by some users as the tires age
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 | B · Kumho Sense KR26 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | All Season Premium Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 17 |
| Rim diameters | — | 13″ – 17″ |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | 9.5/32″ |
| UTQG | 560 A - AA A | 460 A B |
| Treadwear warranty | 50,000 mi | 40,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | 44 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06
Kumho Sense KR26
Winner: Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 — better wet, handling and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Kumho Sense KR26 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 11 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 scores 77 vs 40 on wet.
Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 scores 74 vs 46 on handling.
Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 scores 74 vs 47 on dry.
Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 scores 67 vs 42 on snow.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
ExtremeContact DWS 06 or Sense KR26?
Which is better in the wet, ExtremeContact DWS 06 or Sense KR26?
Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06, 77 vs 40 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, ExtremeContact DWS 06 or Sense KR26?
Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06, 74 vs 47 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, ExtremeContact DWS 06 or Sense KR26?
Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06, 67 vs 42 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, ExtremeContact DWS 06 or Sense KR26?
Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06, 70 vs 60 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, ExtremeContact DWS 06 or Sense KR26?
Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06, 69 vs 54 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, ExtremeContact DWS 06 or Sense KR26?
Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06, 66 vs 54 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology