Tests – · 1 test Owners 72 · 104 reviews
Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 vs Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 6 road tests and 104 + 25 owner reviews. How we score
ExtremeContact DWS 06 is ahead, 73–67
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 66 · 6 tests Owners 66 · 25 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 10 in 2020 UHP, UUHP and Track Day Tyre Test (dry braking)
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
75
Dry
Pilot Sport Cup 2 +883Why this score
Source ExtremeContact DWS 06 Pilot Sport Cup 2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 6 tests ≈ 72 (est.) 84 Reviews found online 79 82 ExtremeContact DWS 06: 60% × 72.5 (est.) + 40% × 78.9 = 75
Pilot Sport Cup 2: 60% × 84.3 + 40% × 82.3 = 83
No road tests of dry for ExtremeContact DWS 06. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
79
Wet
ExtremeContact DWS 06 +2455Why this score
Source ExtremeContact DWS 06 Pilot Sport Cup 2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 6 tests ≈ 77 (est.) 52 Reviews found online 82 60 ExtremeContact DWS 06: 60% × 76.9 (est.) + 40% × 82.1 = 79
Pilot Sport Cup 2: 60% × 52.2 + 40% × 59.9 = 55
No road tests of wet for ExtremeContact DWS 06. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
68
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source ExtremeContact DWS 06 Pilot Sport Cup 2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) – Reviews found online 66 – ExtremeContact DWS 06: 60% × 68.9 (est.) + 40% × 65.5 = 68
No road tests of snow for ExtremeContact DWS 06. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
67
Comfort
ExtremeContact DWS 06 +859Why this score
Source ExtremeContact DWS 06 Pilot Sport Cup 2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 68 (est.) 48 Reviews found online 66 66 ExtremeContact DWS 06: 40% × 68.2 (est.) + 60% × 66.4 = 67
Pilot Sport Cup 2: 40% × 47.7 + 60% × 65.7 = 59
No road tests of comfort for ExtremeContact DWS 06. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
69
Noise
Level69Why this score
Source ExtremeContact DWS 06 Pilot Sport Cup 2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests ≈ 66 (est.) 71 Reviews found online 74 ≈ 66 (est.) ExtremeContact DWS 06: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 73.5 = 69
Pilot Sport Cup 2: 60% × 70.9 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 69
No road tests of noise for ExtremeContact DWS 06. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
No owner ratings of noise for Pilot Sport Cup 2. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
65
Treadwear
ExtremeContact DWS 06 +857Why this score
Source ExtremeContact DWS 06 Pilot Sport Cup 2 Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests 70 ≈ 61 (est.) Reviews found online 59 51 ExtremeContact DWS 06: 60% × 69.9 + 40% × 58.5 = 65
Pilot Sport Cup 2: 60% × 61 (est.) + 40% × 51.2 = 57
No road tests of treadwear for Pilot Sport Cup 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
75
Handling (owners)
Pilot Sport Cup 2 +681Why this score
Source ExtremeContact DWS 06 Pilot Sport Cup 2 Reviews found online 75 81 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison58Why this score
Source ExtremeContact DWS 06 Pilot Sport Cup 2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests – 58
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 | Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 73 | 67 |
| Dry | 75 | 83 |
| Wet | 79 | 55 |
| Snow | 68 | – |
| Comfort | 67 | 59 |
| Noise | 69 | 69 |
| Treadwear | 65 | 57 |
| Handling (owners) | 75 | 81 |
| Efficiency | – | 58 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
ExtremeContact DWS 06
Pilot Sport Cup 2
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | ExtremeContact DWS 06 | Pilot Sport Cup 2 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #6/19 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance All-Season Tires | #2/6 The BEST Track Day Tyres for 2024 | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ExtremeContact DWS 06
Pros
- Exceptional wet and dry traction
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Strong performance in light snow and cold weather
Cons
- Softer sidewalls can reduce steering sharpness or cause rollover during heavy track/autocross use
- Tread wear can be faster than expected with aggressive driving or on lower-profile sizes
- Occasional reports of increased road noise or vibration as the tire ages
Tire B Pilot Sport Cup 2
Pros
- Phenomenal and reliable dry grip, especially when heated
- Exceptional steering response, precision, and road feedback
- Strong track-day performance with durable, stiff sidewalls
Cons
- Fast tread wear resulting in short lifespan
- Poor performance and low grip when cold, making them less ideal for purely street-driven cars
- High purchase price and negative impact on fuel consumption
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 | B · Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 18 |
| Rim diameters | — | 18″ – 21″ |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 560 A - AA A | 180 - 240 AA A |
| Treadwear warranty | 50,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | — |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06
Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2
Winner: Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 — better wet, comfort and treadwear. Pick the Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 if dry and handling matter most to you.
Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 scores 79 vs 55 on wet.
Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 scores 67 vs 59 on comfort.
Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 scores 65 vs 57 on treadwear.
Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 scores 83 vs 75 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
ExtremeContact DWS 06 or Pilot Sport Cup 2?
Which is better in the wet, ExtremeContact DWS 06 or Pilot Sport Cup 2?
Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06, 79 vs 55 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, ExtremeContact DWS 06 or Pilot Sport Cup 2?
Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2, 83 vs 75 on our dry score.
Which is quieter, ExtremeContact DWS 06 or Pilot Sport Cup 2?
Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 69 on the noise score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, ExtremeContact DWS 06 or Pilot Sport Cup 2?
Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06, 67 vs 59 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, ExtremeContact DWS 06 or Pilot Sport Cup 2?
Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06, 65 vs 57 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology