Tests – · 1 test Owners 72 · 104 reviews
Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 vs Michelin Primacy MXM4 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 1 road tests and 104 + 10 owner reviews. How we score
ExtremeContact DWS 06 is ahead, 73–62
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 72 · 1 test Owners 54 · 10 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
75
Dry
ExtremeContact DWS 06 +273Why this score
Source ExtremeContact DWS 06 Primacy MXM4 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 72 (est.) 87 Reviews found online 79 51 ExtremeContact DWS 06: 60% × 72.5 (est.) + 40% × 78.9 = 75
Primacy MXM4: 60% × 87.2 + 40% × 51.1 = 73
No road tests of dry for ExtremeContact DWS 06. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
79
Wet
ExtremeContact DWS 06 +2257Why this score
Source ExtremeContact DWS 06 Primacy MXM4 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 77 (est.) 57 Reviews found online 82 57 ExtremeContact DWS 06: 60% × 76.9 (est.) + 40% × 82.1 = 79
Primacy MXM4: 60% × 56.7 + 40% × 57.1 = 57
No road tests of wet for ExtremeContact DWS 06. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
68
Snow
ExtremeContact DWS 06 +1157Why this score
Source ExtremeContact DWS 06 Primacy MXM4 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 63 (est.) Reviews found online 66 47 ExtremeContact DWS 06: 60% × 68.9 (est.) + 40% × 65.5 = 68
Primacy MXM4: 60% × 63.1 (est.) + 40% × 47.3 = 57
No road tests of snow for ExtremeContact DWS 06. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for Primacy MXM4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
67
Comfort
ExtremeContact DWS 06 +1354Why this score
Source ExtremeContact DWS 06 Primacy MXM4 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 68 (est.) 63 Reviews found online 66 48 ExtremeContact DWS 06: 40% × 68.2 (est.) + 60% × 66.4 = 67
Primacy MXM4: 40% × 63.4 + 60% × 47.5 = 54
No road tests of comfort for ExtremeContact DWS 06. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
69
Noise
Primacy MXM4 +675Why this score
Source ExtremeContact DWS 06 Primacy MXM4 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 66 (est.) 81 Reviews found online 74 ≈ 66 (est.) ExtremeContact DWS 06: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 73.5 = 69
Primacy MXM4: 60% × 81.2 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 75
No road tests of noise for ExtremeContact DWS 06. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
No owner ratings of noise for Primacy MXM4. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
65
Treadwear
ExtremeContact DWS 06 +362Why this score
Source ExtremeContact DWS 06 Primacy MXM4 Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests 70 ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 59 59 ExtremeContact DWS 06: 60% × 69.9 + 40% × 58.5 = 65
Primacy MXM4: 60% × 63.9 (est.) + 40% × 59.3 = 62
No road tests of treadwear for Primacy MXM4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
75
Handling (owners)
ExtremeContact DWS 06 +2649Why this score
Source ExtremeContact DWS 06 Primacy MXM4 Reviews found online 75 49 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison55Why this score
Source ExtremeContact DWS 06 Primacy MXM4 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests – 55
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 | Michelin Primacy MXM4 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 73 | 62 |
| Dry | 75 | 73 |
| Wet | 79 | 57 |
| Snow | 68 | 57 |
| Comfort | 67 | 54 |
| Noise | 69 | 75 |
| Treadwear | 65 | 62 |
| Handling (owners) | 75 | 49 |
| Efficiency | – | 55 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
ExtremeContact DWS 06
Primacy MXM4
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | ExtremeContact DWS 06 | Primacy MXM4 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #6/19 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance All-Season Tires | #4/3 2024 AutoView All-Season Tire Test R18 | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ExtremeContact DWS 06
Pros
- Exceptional wet and dry traction
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Strong performance in light snow and cold weather
Cons
- Softer sidewalls can reduce steering sharpness or cause rollover during heavy track/autocross use
- Tread wear can be faster than expected with aggressive driving or on lower-profile sizes
- Occasional reports of increased road noise or vibration as the tire ages
Tire B Primacy MXM4
Pros
- Exceptional ride comfort and vibration dampening
- Strong tread life and durability
- High fuel efficiency
Cons
- Mediocre dry grip and handling precision
- Noticeable understeer when cornering
- Soft sidewalls that lack steering feedback
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 | B · Michelin Primacy MXM4 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 560 A - AA A | 420 - 500 AA - B A |
| Treadwear warranty | 50,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | — |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06
Michelin Primacy MXM4
Winner: Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 — better handling, wet and comfort. Pick the Michelin Primacy MXM4 if noise matters most to you. Michelin Primacy MXM4 rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 10 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 scores 75 vs 49 on handling.
Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 scores 79 vs 57 on wet.
Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 scores 67 vs 54 on comfort.
Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06 scores 68 vs 57 on snow.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
ExtremeContact DWS 06 or Primacy MXM4?
Which is better in the wet, ExtremeContact DWS 06 or Primacy MXM4?
Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06, 79 vs 57 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, ExtremeContact DWS 06 or Primacy MXM4?
Neither, by our numbers: 75 vs 73 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is better in snow, ExtremeContact DWS 06 or Primacy MXM4?
Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06, 68 vs 57 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, ExtremeContact DWS 06 or Primacy MXM4?
Michelin Primacy MXM4, 75 vs 69 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, ExtremeContact DWS 06 or Primacy MXM4?
Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06, 67 vs 54 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, ExtremeContact DWS 06 or Primacy MXM4?
Continental ExtremeContact DWS 06, 65 vs 62 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology