Head-to-head Updated

Continental ExtremeContact Sport vs Kumho Ecsta V720 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 2 + 0 road tests and 45 + 11 owner reviews. How we score

ExtremeContact Sport is ahead, 76–61

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Continental ExtremeContact Sport
± 5

Tests 74 · 2 tests Owners 70 · 45 reviews

Best test result: #6 of 22 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires (tested tread life (miles))

Kumho Ecsta V720
Tire BKumho

Ecsta V720

Summer

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 55 · 11 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 77

    Dry

    ExtremeContact Sport +7
    70
    Why this score
    SourceExtremeContact SportEcsta V720
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests74≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online8071

    ExtremeContact Sport: 60% × 73.9 + 40% × 80.4 = 77

    Ecsta V720: 60% × 69.2 (est.) + 40% × 70.6 = 70

    No road tests of dry for Ecsta V720. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 80

    Wet

    ExtremeContact Sport +21
    59
    Why this score
    SourceExtremeContact SportEcsta V720
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests80≈ 62 (est.)
    Reviews found online8154

    ExtremeContact Sport: 60% × 79.6 + 40% × 80.5 = 80

    Ecsta V720: 60% × 61.7 (est.) + 40% × 54.3 = 59

    No road tests of wet for Ecsta V720. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 47

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceExtremeContact SportEcsta V720
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 56 (est.)–
    Reviews found online32–

    ExtremeContact Sport: 60% × 56.4 (est.) + 40% × 32.2 = 47

    No road tests of snow for ExtremeContact Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 73

    Comfort

    ExtremeContact Sport +22
    51
    Why this score
    SourceExtremeContact SportEcsta V720
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online7443

    ExtremeContact Sport: 40% × 70.1 (est.) + 60% × 74.4 = 73

    Ecsta V720: 40% × 64.3 (est.) + 60% × 42.9 = 51

    No road tests of comfort for ExtremeContact Sport or Ecsta V720. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 71

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceExtremeContact SportEcsta V720
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests73–
    Reviews found online68–

    ExtremeContact Sport: 60% × 72.9 + 40% × 68.1 = 71

  6. 69

    Treadwear

    ExtremeContact Sport +19
    50
    Why this score
    SourceExtremeContact SportEcsta V720
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests70≈ 57 (est.)
    Reviews found online6840

    ExtremeContact Sport: 60% × 70.2 + 40% × 68 = 69

    Ecsta V720: 60% × 56.9 (est.) + 40% × 39.6 = 50

    No road tests of treadwear for Ecsta V720. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 75

    Handling (owners)

    ExtremeContact Sport +3
    72
    Why this score
    SourceExtremeContact SportEcsta V720
    Reviews found online7572
Scores at a glance
Continental ExtremeContact Sport vs Kumho Ecsta V720: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental ExtremeContact SportKumho Ecsta V720
Relative Score 76 61
Dry 77 70
Wet 80 59
Snow 47 –
Comfort 73 51
Noise 71 –
Treadwear 69 50
Handling (owners) 75 72

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 5

ExtremeContact Sport

± 8

Ecsta V720

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ExtremeContact Sport

Pros

  • Exceptional dry and wet traction with high confidence in the rain
  • High value for money compared to primary competitors like Michelin
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality for an ultra-high-performance tire

Cons

  • Softer sidewalls leading to a slight delay or lack of immediate steering feedback and precision
  • Requires a brief warm-up period in colder temperatures, sometimes causing temporary vibrations
  • Stiff ride over sharp road imperfections noted by some users
All owner themes in the ExtremeContact Sport review

Tire B Ecsta V720

Pros

  • Exceptional dry grip and traction for high-horsepower vehicles
  • Excellent price-to-performance ratio
  • Precise steering feedback and firm sidewall construction

Cons

  • High levels of road noise
  • Rapid tread wear
  • Inconsistent wet weather performance, with some reports of hydroplaning
All owner themes in the Ecsta V720 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental ExtremeContact Sport B · Kumho Ecsta V720
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Tread depth10/32″—
UTQG340 AA A—
Treadwear warranty30,000 mi—
SidewallBlack Side Wall—
Max pressure44 - 51 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental ExtremeContact Sport

Kumho Ecsta V720

Winner: Continental ExtremeContact Sport — better comfort, wet and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score. Kumho Ecsta V720 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 11 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Continental ExtremeContact Sport scores 73 vs 51 on comfort.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Continental ExtremeContact Sport scores 80 vs 59 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Continental ExtremeContact Sport scores 69 vs 50 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Continental ExtremeContact Sport scores 77 vs 70 on dry.

Tire A · Continental ExtremeContact Sport
Tire B · Kumho Ecsta V720

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

ExtremeContact Sport or Ecsta V720?

Which is better in the wet, ExtremeContact Sport or Ecsta V720?

Continental ExtremeContact Sport, 80 vs 59 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, ExtremeContact Sport or Ecsta V720?

Continental ExtremeContact Sport, 77 vs 70 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, ExtremeContact Sport or Ecsta V720?

Continental ExtremeContact Sport, 73 vs 51 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, ExtremeContact Sport or Ecsta V720?

Continental ExtremeContact Sport, 69 vs 50 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology