Head-to-head Updated

Continental ExtremeContact Sport vs Falken Azenis FK510 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.

ExtremeContact Sport leads, 71–70 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Tests 74 · 2 tests Owners 69 · 45 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 5 in 2017 Car and Driver UHP Tyre Test (wet braking)

Tire BFalken

Azenis FK510

Summer

Tests 74 · 31 tests Owners 67 · 905 reviews

Best test result: #2 of 9 in 2018 Sport Auto 19 inch UHP and Track Day Tyre Test (wet handling)

“Falken Azenis SUV (FK510) Replaced my Goodyear tires after 2 years. Was using Continental prior to that. Read some good reviews regarding the Falken FK510 SUV, some even mentioned it as the poor man's Michelin tires. Goodyear's tires were a bit rough, every time we drove through a bump or potholes felt really bumpy. Conti was soft, but it's lifespan is a bit short, usually lasts me a year or so. After driving around a day with FK510, it feels nice, somewhat like Conti. Here's hoping that it'll last me 2 years. Read more”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 76

    Dry

    ExtremeContact Sport +2
    74
    Why this score
    SourceExtremeContact SportAzenis FK510
    Professional tests (TWG score)7472
    Reviews found online8076
    Dry Braking (% of best)100%95%
    Dry Handling (% of best)98%100%
  2. 78

    Wet

    Azenis FK510 +5
    83
    Why this score
    SourceExtremeContact SportAzenis FK510
    Professional tests (TWG score)7887
    Reviews found online7877
    Wet Braking (% of best)100%96%
    Wet Handling (% of best)100%96%
  3. 47

    Snow

    Azenis FK510 +8
    55
    Why this score
    SourceExtremeContact SportAzenis FK510
    Reviews found online3245
  4. 72

    Comfort

    ExtremeContact Sport +20
    52
    Why this score
    SourceExtremeContact SportAzenis FK510
    Professional tests (TWG score)–42
    Reviews found online7468
  5. 71

    Noise

    ExtremeContact Sport +3
    68
    Why this score
    SourceExtremeContact SportAzenis FK510
    Professional tests (TWG score)7368
    Reviews found online6968
  6. 69

    Treadwear

    ExtremeContact Sport +3
    66
    Why this score
    SourceExtremeContact SportAzenis FK510
    Professional tests (TWG score)7072
    Reviews found online6857
  7. 74

    Handling

    ExtremeContact Sport +3
    71
    Why this score
    SourceExtremeContact SportAzenis FK510
    Reviews found online7471
Scores at a glance
Continental ExtremeContact Sport vs Falken Azenis FK510: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental ExtremeContact SportFalken Azenis FK510
Relative Score 71 70
Dry 76 74
Wet 78 83
Snow 47 55
Comfort 72 52
Noise 71 68
Treadwear 69 66
Handling 74 71

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score

ExtremeContact Sport

Azenis FK510

The professional test results behind the scores

Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.

DisciplineCategoryExtremeContact SportAzenis FK510ΔBoth?
Dry Braking Dry 100% #2/5 · 2017 Car and Driver UHP Tyre Test 95% #9/10 · 2022 AMS Performance Summer Tyre Test +5.0 Different tests
Dry Handling Dry 98% #3/5 · 2017 Car and Driver UHP Tyre Test 100% #6/10 · 2022 AMS Performance Summer Tyre Test −2.0 Different tests
Noise Other 99% #2/5 · 2017 Car and Driver UHP Tyre Test 99% #5/9 · 2018 AZ Summer AND All Season Tyre Test −0.1 Different tests
Tested Tread Life (Miles) Other 62% #6/22 · 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires 54% #17/22 · 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires +7.7 Same test
Overall Ranking Overall 50% #2/5 · 2017 Car and Driver UHP Tyre Test 33% #3/11 · 2022 AutoBild Sports Cars UHP Summer Tyre Test +16.7 Different tests
Wet Braking Wet 100% #1/5 · 2017 Car and Driver UHP Tyre Test 96% #3/9 · 2017 EVO Summer Tyre Test +3.6 Different tests
Wet Handling Wet 100% #1/5 · 2017 Car and Driver UHP Tyre Test 96% #2/9 · 2018 Sport Auto 19 inch UHP and Track Day Tyre Test +4.0 Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ExtremeContact Sport

Pros

  • Exceptional dry and wet traction with high confidence in the rain
  • High value for money compared to primary competitors like Michelin
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality for an ultra-high-performance tire

Cons

  • Softer sidewalls leading to a slight delay or lack of immediate steering feedback and precision
  • Requires a brief warm-up period in colder temperatures, sometimes causing temporary vibrations
  • Stiff ride over sharp road imperfections noted by some users
All owner themes in the ExtremeContact Sport review

Tire B Azenis FK510

Pros

  • Outstanding grip in both wet and dry conditions
  • Exceptional value and lower price point compared to premium brands
  • Smooth and comfortable ride quality that absorbs road imperfections well

Cons

  • Accelerated tread wear and shorter overall lifespan
  • Softer sidewalls can result in slightly delayed initial steering response or a feeling of looseness during aggressive high-speed maneuvers
  • Occasional reports of increased tire noise or harshness on specific rough or concrete road surfaces
All owner themes in the Azenis FK510 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Continental ExtremeContact Sport

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Falken Azenis FK510

Mixed

Community opinions on the Falken Azenis FK510 are generally mixed, balancing praise for their value pricing and strong wet-weather grip against complaints regarding soft sidewalls, rapid tread wear on heavy or track-driven vehicles, and handling that some drivers describe as "boaty." While many view them as a cost-effective alternative to premium tires like the Michelin Pilot Sport 4S, others note that recent price hikes and mixed performance in testing make them a secondary choice compared to dedicated track or alternative ultra-high-performance tires.

r/tires ·2 upvotes ·2022-02-08

“Falken Azenis FK510 prices? Anyone know why the prices for Falken Azenis FK510's went up 25% or more in the last month? 235/40R18 went from $154 to $192. The whole benefit of these tires is that they offer PS4S performance for way less money. Now, you midaswhale just buy the Michelins. I haven't seen any other summer tires make that kind of a jump in price. I know Falken announced a price increase for 2022, but it was only like 5%. What's the dealio? Read more”

r/TeslaModel3 ·1 upvote ·2024-02-10

“I put the fk510 on my 2014 535d msport and the rears only lasted 10-11k or one year. Trying something different. They are a good performance summer tire but not worth replacing every year.”

r/CarTrackDays ·4 upvotes ·2019-01-27

“Upgrading tires from Falken Azenis FK510, looking for recommendations Hey all, I drive a V6 1LE camaro, i've been doing a lot of open practice sessions at a small track (the driveway in austin, tx), long story short I bought brand new Azenis FK510 two months ago, only about 4k street miles, and after about 3 hours of track time they're pretty much done....mostly from noob mistakes like overcooking the entry and destroying the front shoulders, and having the rear tires way too overinflated so the shoulders are fine but the center are down to the wear bars. Even under ideal conditions and purposely driving slower and smoother I can't see these lasting much more than 4-5 hours of track time, I'm just surprised to see these tires wear down very very quickly under hard driving and overheat somewhat quickly, these are awesome daily driving tires but I'm looking for more track performance. I'm currently debating between pilot sport 4s, bridgestone re-71r, firehawk indy 500. This is more of a philosophical question, I'm looking at a wide variety of treadwear tires, I'm curious how you guys decide on what treadwear tires to run and how you decide between wear, price, and grip. I'm leaning towards the RE-71r right now, I figure if I'm burning through my tires in a few months anyways might as well do it with sticky tires since my falkens didn't last long anyways... Read more”

Top themes
#Wet weather grip#Value and pricing#Treadwear and lifespan#Sidewall stiffness and handling#Autocross and track performance

Based on 25 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental ExtremeContact Sport B · Falken Azenis FK510
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available193
Rim diameters17″17″ – 22″
Tread depth10/32″10/32″
UTQG340 AA A300 A A
Treadwear warranty30,000 mi—
SidewallBlack Side WallBlackwall
Max pressure44 - 51 psi50 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental ExtremeContact Sport

Falken Azenis FK510

Too close to call: Continental ExtremeContact Sport and Falken Azenis FK510 are within 2 points overall. Continental ExtremeContact Sport is stronger on comfort, noise and treadwear. Falken Azenis FK510 is stronger on snow and wet.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Continental ExtremeContact Sport scores 72 vs 52 on comfort.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Falken Azenis FK510 scores 55 vs 47 on snow.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Falken Azenis FK510 scores 83 vs 78 on wet.

Pick tire A You want a quieter cabin

Continental ExtremeContact Sport scores 71 vs 68 on noise.

Tire A · Continental ExtremeContact Sport
Tire B · Falken Azenis FK510

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.

71

Narrow edge

ExtremeContact Sport

Amazon