Best test result: #1 of 9 in 2022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19 (steering response)
“Wow! You burn rubber. I totally appreciate what you’ve said and on my old e60 I ran both contis D06 and Michelins ps4 for 3 sets each. Both different feel and wear. Contis lasted longer but didn’t feel as nice as PS4. Now I’m in another BMW and cannot rotate the same way with a staggered wheel size. I’m in NC, when I drove PS4, in cold weather, they wore out quickly. They are a summer tire for sure, but I will use a slightly higher pressure to lengthen service life. That camber is rough on the inner tire shoulder / tread and the all season contains held up better there.”
Best test result: #2 of 20 in 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (wear)
“Funny, I just had this conversation in r/ecoboostmustang . I was in this exact boat when I first started out autocrossing. I got on 200 TW for 2020 but continued to HPDE on the daily summer tires. Indy 500 - Spring 2019 to Winter 2020 - These take an INCREDIBLE amount of abuse for the money. 30+ autocrosses, 2 HPDEs, 18,000 miles G-Max RS - Fall 2020 to Summer 2021 - Only bummer is they're directional, you technically shouldn't rotate. 10 HPDEs, 15,000 miles Falken FK510 - Spring 2020 to Summer 2020 - HARD NO from me. I corded a set in 10,000 miles between daily & 6 HPDEs.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
85
Dry
Pilot Sport 4 +11
74
Why this score
Source
Pilot Sport 4
Azenis FK510
Professional tests (TWG score)
88
73
Reviews found online
81
76
Dry Braking (% of best)
100%
98%
Dry Handling (% of best)
100%
99%
87
Wet
Pilot Sport 4 +4
83
Why this score
Source
Pilot Sport 4
Azenis FK510
Professional tests (TWG score)
91
87
Reviews found online
81
77
Longitudinal Aquaplaning (% of best)
80%
60%
Transverse Aquaplaning (% of best)
80%
70%
Wet Braking (% of best)
98%
93%
Wet Circle (% of best)
97%
98%
Wet Handling (% of best)
98%
97%
–
Snow
No comparison
55
Why this score
Source
Pilot Sport 4
Azenis FK510
Reviews found online
–
45
78
Comfort
Pilot Sport 4 +26
52
Why this score
Source
Pilot Sport 4
Azenis FK510
Professional tests (TWG score)
83
42
Reviews found online
71
68
74
Noise
Pilot Sport 4 +6
68
Why this score
Source
Pilot Sport 4
Azenis FK510
Professional tests (TWG score)
76
67
Reviews found online
72
68
Exterior Noise (% of best)
90%
70%
70
Treadwear
Pilot Sport 4 +4
66
Why this score
Source
Pilot Sport 4
Azenis FK510
Professional tests (TWG score)
76
72
Reviews found online
61
57
78
Handling
Pilot Sport 4 +7
71
Why this score
Source
Pilot Sport 4
Azenis FK510
Reviews found online
78
71
Scores at a glance
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Falken Azenis FK510: scores by category (0–100)
Category
Michelin Pilot Sport 4
Falken Azenis FK510
Relative Score
80
72
Dry
85
74
Wet
87
83
Snow
–
55
Comfort
78
52
Noise
74
68
Treadwear
70
66
Handling
78
71
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neither tire has a score here yet, so this weight changes nothing.
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
80
/ 100
Pilot Sport 4
72
/ 100
Azenis FK510
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Each result is shown as % of the best tire in that test. “Same test” rows are the strictest comparison: both tires were measured side by side.
Discipline
Category
Pilot Sport 4
Azenis FK510
Δ
Both?
Curved Aquaplaning
Curved
89%#6/11 · 2022 AutoBild Sports Cars UHP Summer Tyre Test
100%#2/10 · 2022 AutoBild 19 Inch Summer UHP Tyre Test
−11.0
Different tests
Dry Braking
Dry
100%#3/16 · 2018 Test World Summer Tyre Test
98%#7/9 · 2017 Auto Bild UHP Tyre Test
+1.9
Different tests
Dry Handling
Dry
100%#2/10 · 2021 Auto Zeitung Summer UHP Tyre Test
99%#6/11 · 2018 AMS Summer UHP Tyre Test
+0.7
Different tests
Rolling Resistance
Efficiency
97%#4/10 · 2021 Auto Zeitung Summer UHP Tyre Test
91%#8/10 · 2021 Auto Zeitung Summer UHP Tyre Test
+6.2
Same test
Exterior Noise
Noise
90%#3/9 · 2022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19
70%#8/9 · 2022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19
+20.0
Same test
Noise
Other
99%#3/10 · 2022 AMS Performance Summer Tyre Test
97%#9/10 · 2022 AutoBild 19 Inch Summer UHP Tyre Test
+2.2
Different tests
Price
Other
63%#9/10 · 2022 AMS Performance Summer Tyre Test
99%#2/6 · 2018 EVO UUHP Tyre Test
−36.0
Different tests
Safety
Other
90%#2/9 · 2022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19
60%#10/9 · 2022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19
+30.0
Same test
Steering Response
Other
100%#1/9 · 2022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19
67%#10/9 · 2022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19
+33.3
Same test
Wet Lateral Stability
Other
70%#8/9 · 2022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19
80%#3/9 · 2022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19
−10.0
Same test
Value
Other
59%#20/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test
74%#5/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test
−14.4
Different tests
Wear
Other
96%#5/16 · 2020 ADAC 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test
87%#2/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test
+9.5
Different tests
Overall Ranking
Overall
100%#1/9 · 2017 EVO Summer Tyre Test
13%#8/10 · 2022 AMS Performance Summer Tyre Test
+87.5
Different tests
Straight Aqua
Straight
99%#3/7 · 2019 EVO Summer Tyre Test
100%#2/9 · 2021 Auto Bild UUHP Summer Tyre Test
−0.8
Different tests
Subj. Comfort
Subj
90%#3/11 · 2020 AMS 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test
60%#8/8 · 2019 Sport Auto 20 Inch UHP Tyre Test
+30.0
Different tests
Subj. Dry Handling
Subj
90%#2/9 · 2022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19
75%#7/7 · 2019 EVO Summer Tyre Test
+15.4
Different tests
Subj. Wet Handling
Subj
96%#2/7 · 2019 EVO Summer Tyre Test
88%#5/10 · 2025 Tire Rack UUHP Summer Tyre Test
+7.8
Different tests
Total Cost of Ownership
Total
0%#16/20 · 2020 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test
0%#9/20 · 2019 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test
0.0
Different tests
Longitudinal Aquaplaning
Wet
80%#2/9 · 2022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19
60%#9/9 · 2022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19
+20.0
Same test
Transverse Aquaplaning
Wet
80%#5/9 · 2022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19
70%#6/9 · 2022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19
+10.0
Same test
Wet Braking
Wet
98%#2/10 · 2017 Sport Auto UHP and Track Day Test
93%#8/49 · 2020 Tyre Market Overview Braking Test
+4.5
Different tests
Wet Circle
Wet
97%#4/10 · 2022 Sport Auto UHP, UUHP and Semi Slick Tyre Test
98%#6/8 · 2021 Sport Auto UHP Summer Tyre Test
−1.0
Different tests
Wet Handling
Wet
98%#5/11 · 2022 AutoBild Sports Cars UHP Summer Tyre Test
97%#6/11 · 2022 AutoBild Sports Cars UHP Summer Tyre Test
+0.6
Same test
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Pilot Sport 4
Pros
Exceptional wet and dry traction with outstanding resistance to aquaplaning
Noticeable improvement in ride comfort and a reduction in cabin noise compared to standard run-flat tires
Progressive and predictable breakaway limits during spirited driving
Cons
Faster-than-average treadwear, particularly under aggressive driving or on rear-wheel-drive performance cars
Softer sidewalls can lead to a slight lack of initial steering precision and a vague feel at the limit for hardcore enthusiasts
Performance drops off significantly in cold, freezing, or snowy winter conditions
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Michelin Pilot Sport 4
Positive
Community opinion on the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 (and PS4S/AS variants) is overwhelmingly positive, with users frequently praising the massive upgrades in grip, wet weather performance, and steering feel compared to stock run-flats or budget tires. While some note trade-offs in tread life, cost, and colder temperature performance, they are widely regarded as a top-tier choice for daily driving and spirited handling.
#Exceptional Grip and Handling#Wet Weather Performance#Ride Quality and Noise#Tread Life and Wear#Run-Flat Replacement#Summer vs All-Season Comparison
Based on 131 community posts
Tire B
Falken Azenis FK510
Mixed
Community opinions on the Falken Azenis FK510 are generally mixed, balancing praise for their value pricing and strong wet-weather grip against complaints regarding soft sidewalls, rapid tread wear on heavy or track-driven vehicles, and handling that some drivers describe as "boaty." While many view them as a cost-effective alternative to premium tires like the Michelin Pilot Sport 4S, others note that recent price hikes and mixed performance in testing make them a secondary choice compared to dedicated track or alternative ultra-high-performance tires.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.