Head-to-head Updated

Continental IceContact 3 vs Goodyear Ultra Grip Performance Gen-1 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 13 + 4 road tests and 3 + 32 owner reviews. How we score

Ultra Grip Performance Gen-1 is ahead, 77–72

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Continental IceContact 3

IceContact 3

Winter

± 5

Tests 79 · 13 tests Owners 65 · 3 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 19 in 2023 UTAC Large Winter Tire Test R16 (ice handling)

Tests 72 · 4 tests Owners 81 · 32 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 10 in 2017 Auto Bild SUV Winter Tyre Test (wet braking)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 73

    Dry

    Ultra Grip Performance Gen-1 +1
    74
    Why this score
    SourceIceContact 3Ultra Grip Performance Gen-1
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 11 / 4 tests7669
    Reviews found online6780

    IceContact 3: 60% × 76 + 40% × 67.4 = 73

    Ultra Grip Performance Gen-1: 60% × 69.5 + 40% × 80.4 = 74

  2. 73

    Wet

    Ultra Grip Performance Gen-1 +10
    83
    Why this score
    SourceIceContact 3Ultra Grip Performance Gen-1
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 12 / 4 tests7482
    Reviews found online7086

    IceContact 3: 60% × 74.5 + 40% × 69.6 = 73

    Ultra Grip Performance Gen-1: 60% × 81.9 + 40% × 85.7 = 83

  3. 79

    Snow

    IceContact 3 +2
    77
    Why this score
    SourceIceContact 3Ultra Grip Performance Gen-1
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 12 / 4 tests8476
    Reviews found online7177

    IceContact 3: 60% × 83.9 + 40% × 70.5 = 79

    Ultra Grip Performance Gen-1: 60% × 76.1 + 40% × 77.4 = 77

  4. 75

    Comfort

    Ultra Grip Performance Gen-1 +2
    77
    Why this score
    SourceIceContact 3Ultra Grip Performance Gen-1
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / – tests95≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online6280

    IceContact 3: 40% × 94.6 + 60% × 61.5 = 75

    Ultra Grip Performance Gen-1: 40% × 71 (est.) + 60% × 80.3 = 77

    No road tests of comfort for Ultra Grip Performance Gen-1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 70

    Noise

    IceContact 3 +3
    67
    Why this score
    SourceIceContact 3Ultra Grip Performance Gen-1
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 11 / 3 tests7268
    Reviews found online≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)

    IceContact 3: 60% × 71.9 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 70

    Ultra Grip Performance Gen-1: 60% × 67.7 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 67

    No owner ratings of noise for IceContact 3 or Ultra Grip Performance Gen-1. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 57

    Treadwear

    Ultra Grip Performance Gen-1 +14
    71
    Why this score
    SourceIceContact 3Ultra Grip Performance Gen-1
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 61 (est.)63
    Reviews found online5182

    IceContact 3: 60% × 61 (est.) + 40% × 51.2 = 57

    Ultra Grip Performance Gen-1: 60% × 63.4 + 40% × 81.6 = 71

    No road tests of treadwear for IceContact 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 67

    Handling (owners)

    Ultra Grip Performance Gen-1 +16
    83
    Why this score
    SourceIceContact 3Ultra Grip Performance Gen-1
    Reviews found online6783
  8. 67

    Efficiency

    Ultra Grip Performance Gen-1 +5
    72
    Why this score
    SourceIceContact 3Ultra Grip Performance Gen-1
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 8 / 3 tests6772
Scores at a glance
Continental IceContact 3 vs Goodyear Ultra Grip Performance Gen-1: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental IceContact 3Goodyear Ultra Grip Performance Gen-1
Relative Score 72 77
Dry 73 74
Wet 73 83
Snow 79 77
Comfort 75 77
Noise 70 67
Treadwear 57 71
Handling (owners) 67 83
Efficiency 67 72

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 5

IceContact 3

± 7

Ultra Grip Performance Gen-1

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

In the overall rankings of 1 tests that ran both, Continental IceContact 3 finished ahead 1 times and Goodyear Ultra Grip Performance Gen-1 0 times.

DisciplineCategoryIceContact 3Ultra Grip Performance Gen-1ΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #1/16 #8/16 – 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2019 Teknikens Värld Large Winter Tire Test R17 · 225/50R17

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A IceContact 3

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and braking performance on packed snow and ice
  • Predictable handling in severe winter conditions
  • Strong performance on lake ice tracks

Cons

  • Premature stud wear or loss reported after moderate mileage
  • Potential for reduced stability in deeper snow (4-5 cm) depending on tire width
  • Unpredictable handling characteristics when paired with certain electronic stability control systems
All owner themes in the IceContact 3 review

Tire B Ultra Grip Performance Gen-1

Pros

  • Exceptional wet weather and slush performance
  • Strong traction and braking capabilities in snow
  • High durability and long tread life

Cons

  • Increased road noise reported by some users at higher speeds
  • Vague steering feedback and sidewall flex during spirited dry-road driving
  • Occasional loss of grip in dry conditions or when temperatures exceed 7°C
All owner themes in the Ultra Grip Performance Gen-1 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental IceContact 3 B · Goodyear Ultra Grip Performance Gen-1
CategoryWinterWinter
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available—17
Rim diameters—16″ – 20″
Tread depth—9 - 11/32″
Sidewall—Raised Black Lettering
Max pressure—50 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental IceContact 3

Goodyear Ultra Grip Performance Gen-1

Winner: Goodyear Ultra Grip Performance Gen-1 — better handling, treadwear and wet. Pick the Continental IceContact 3 if noise matters most to you.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Goodyear Ultra Grip Performance Gen-1 scores 83 vs 67 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Goodyear Ultra Grip Performance Gen-1 scores 71 vs 57 on treadwear.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Goodyear Ultra Grip Performance Gen-1 scores 83 vs 73 on wet.

Pick tire B You want lower fuel or energy use

Goodyear Ultra Grip Performance Gen-1 scores 72 vs 67 on efficiency.

Tire A · Continental IceContact 3
Tire B · Goodyear Ultra Grip Performance Gen-1

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

IceContact 3 or Ultra Grip Performance Gen-1?

Which is better in the wet, IceContact 3 or Ultra Grip Performance Gen-1?

Goodyear Ultra Grip Performance Gen-1, 83 vs 73 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, IceContact 3 or Ultra Grip Performance Gen-1?

Neither, by our numbers: 73 vs 74 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is better in snow, IceContact 3 or Ultra Grip Performance Gen-1?

Neither, by our numbers: 79 vs 77 on the snow score, within 3 points.

Which is quieter, IceContact 3 or Ultra Grip Performance Gen-1?

Continental IceContact 3, 70 vs 67 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, IceContact 3 or Ultra Grip Performance Gen-1?

Neither, by our numbers: 75 vs 77 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, IceContact 3 or Ultra Grip Performance Gen-1?

Goodyear Ultra Grip Performance Gen-1, 71 vs 57 on our treadwear score.

Which rolls more easily, IceContact 3 or Ultra Grip Performance Gen-1?

Goodyear Ultra Grip Performance Gen-1, 72 vs 67 on our efficiency score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology