Head-to-head Updated

Continental PureContact LS vs BFGoodrich Advantage T/A Sport LT — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 25 + 0 owner reviews. How we score

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 69

    Dry

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourcePureContact LSAdvantage T/A Sport LT
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)–
    Reviews found online70–

    PureContact LS: 60% × 68.7 (est.) + 40% × 69.5 = 69

    No road tests of dry for PureContact LS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 72

    Wet

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourcePureContact LSAdvantage T/A Sport LT
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 72 (est.)–
    Reviews found online73–

    PureContact LS: 60% × 71.7 (est.) + 40% × 72.5 = 72

    No road tests of wet for PureContact LS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 67

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourcePureContact LSAdvantage T/A Sport LT
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)–
    Reviews found online64–

    PureContact LS: 60% × 68.3 (est.) + 40% × 64.2 = 67

    No road tests of snow for PureContact LS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 59

    Comfort

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourcePureContact LSAdvantage T/A Sport LT
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)–
    Reviews found online55–

    PureContact LS: 40% × 66.5 (est.) + 60% × 54.7 = 59

    No road tests of comfort for PureContact LS. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 68

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourcePureContact LSAdvantage T/A Sport LT
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)–
    Reviews found online71–

    PureContact LS: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 70.8 = 68

    No road tests of noise for PureContact LS. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 68

    Treadwear

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourcePureContact LSAdvantage T/A Sport LT
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)–
    Reviews found online69–

    PureContact LS: 60% × 67 (est.) + 40% × 68.7 = 68

    No road tests of treadwear for PureContact LS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 70

    Handling (owners)

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourcePureContact LSAdvantage T/A Sport LT
    Reviews found online70–
Scores at a glance
Continental PureContact LS vs BFGoodrich Advantage T/A Sport LT: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental PureContact LSBFGoodrich Advantage T/A Sport LT
Relative Score 69 –
Dry 69 –
Wet 72 –
Snow 67 –
Comfort 59 –
Noise 68 –
Treadwear 68 –
Handling (owners) 70 –

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

PureContact LS

Advantage T/A Sport LT

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A PureContact LS

Pros

  • Exceptionally quiet and comfortable ride quality
  • Strong wet and dry traction with reliable handling
  • Good balance of everyday comfort and long treadlife

Cons

  • Soft sidewalls can lead to less responsive or wandering handling during aggressive cornering
  • Develops temporary flat spotting when parked, causing morning vibrations
  • Poor winter performance, particularly lacking traction on snow and ice despite being an all-season tire
All owner themes in the PureContact LS review

Tire B Advantage T/A Sport LT

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental PureContact LS B · BFGoodrich Advantage T/A Sport LT
CategoryAll SeasonAll-Season tire
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverSUV and 4x4
Tread depth10/32″10 - 11/32″
UTQG700 A A660 - 740 B A
Treadwear warranty70,000 mi—
SidewallBlack Side WallBlack Side Wall
Max pressure51 psi44 - 50 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental PureContact LS

BFGoodrich Advantage T/A Sport LT

Only Continental PureContact LS has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.

Tire A · Continental PureContact LS
Tire B · BFGoodrich Advantage T/A Sport LT

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology