Cooper CS4 Touring looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Cooper CS4 Touring vs Kumho Solus TA31 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 35 + 79 owner reviews. How we score

CS4 Touring is ahead, 67–59

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Cooper CS4 Touring
Tire ACooper

CS4 Touring

All Season

± 7

Tests – · none yet Owners 65 · 35 reviews

Kumho Solus TA31
Tire BKumho

Solus TA31

All Season

± 7

Tests – · none yet Owners 55 · 79 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 67

    Dry

    CS4 Touring +8
    59
    Why this score
    SourceCS4 TouringSolus TA31
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 62 (est.)
    Reviews found online6654

    CS4 Touring: 60% × 67.2 (est.) + 40% × 66.2 = 67

    Solus TA31: 60% × 62.2 (est.) + 40% × 53.9 = 59

    No road tests of dry for CS4 Touring. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for Solus TA31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 70

    Wet

    CS4 Touring +8
    62
    Why this score
    SourceCS4 TouringSolus TA31
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online6959

    CS4 Touring: 60% × 69.9 (est.) + 40% × 69.2 = 70

    Solus TA31: 60% × 64.1 (est.) + 40% × 58.6 = 62

    No road tests of wet for CS4 Touring. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Solus TA31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 64

    Snow

    CS4 Touring +8
    56
    Why this score
    SourceCS4 TouringSolus TA31
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online5947

    CS4 Touring: 60% × 66.8 (est.) + 40% × 58.9 = 64

    Solus TA31: 60% × 62.9 (est.) + 40% × 46.6 = 56

    No road tests of snow for CS4 Touring. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

    No road tests of snow for Solus TA31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 66

    Comfort

    CS4 Touring +5
    61
    Why this score
    SourceCS4 TouringSolus TA31
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online6558

    CS4 Touring: 40% × 68 (est.) + 60% × 65.3 = 66

    Solus TA31: 40% × 66.4 (est.) + 60% × 57.5 = 61

    No road tests of comfort for CS4 Touring. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for Solus TA31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 67

    Noise

    CS4 Touring +3
    64
    Why this score
    SourceCS4 TouringSolus TA31
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online6861

    CS4 Touring: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 68 = 67

    Solus TA31: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 60.9 = 64

    No road tests of noise for CS4 Touring or Solus TA31. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 64

    Treadwear

    CS4 Touring +5
    59
    Why this score
    SourceCS4 TouringSolus TA31
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 62 (est.)
    Reviews found online6254

    CS4 Touring: 60% × 64.9 (est.) + 40% × 61.9 = 64

    Solus TA31: 60% × 62 (est.) + 40% × 54.1 = 59

    No road tests of treadwear for CS4 Touring. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Solus TA31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 68

    Handling (owners)

    CS4 Touring +14
    54
    Why this score
    SourceCS4 TouringSolus TA31
    Reviews found online6854
Scores at a glance
Cooper CS4 Touring vs Kumho Solus TA31: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryCooper CS4 TouringKumho Solus TA31
Relative Score 67 59
Dry 67 59
Wet 70 62
Snow 64 56
Comfort 66 61
Noise 67 64
Treadwear 64 59
Handling (owners) 68 54

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

CS4 Touring

± 7

Solus TA31

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A CS4 Touring

Pros

  • Excellent wet and winter weather traction, including reliable performance in heavy rain and snow without hydroplaning
  • Low road noise and high ride comfort
  • Good overall value for the money with competitive longevity

Cons

  • Grip decreases noticeably as the tire wears down toward the end of its life
  • Faster tread wear reported under heavy-load or towing conditions
  • Discontinued by the manufacturer, making replacement matching difficult
All owner themes in the CS4 Touring review

Tire B Solus TA31

Pros

  • Exceptional value and budget-friendly pricing
  • Very low road noise and a comfortable, smooth ride
  • Good dry and wet traction for everyday commuting

Cons

  • Poor performance in snow and ice conditions
  • Soft sidewalls leading to reduced high-speed stability and less sharp handling
  • Inconsistent tread wear reported by some users, leading to premature replacement
All owner themes in the Solus TA31 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Cooper CS4 Touring B · Kumho Solus TA31
CategoryAll SeasonAll Season
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available122
Rim diameters17″15″ – 20″
Tread depth11/32″9.5/32″
UTQG520 A A500 A A
Treadwear warranty60,000 mi60,000 mi
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure44 psi44 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Cooper CS4 Touring

Kumho Solus TA31

Winner: Cooper CS4 Touring — better handling, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Cooper CS4 Touring scores 68 vs 54 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Cooper CS4 Touring scores 67 vs 59 on dry.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Cooper CS4 Touring scores 70 vs 62 on wet.

Pick tire A You drive through snowy winters

Cooper CS4 Touring scores 64 vs 56 on snow.

Tire A · Cooper CS4 Touring
Tire B · Kumho Solus TA31

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

CS4 Touring or Solus TA31?

Which is better in the wet, CS4 Touring or Solus TA31?

Cooper CS4 Touring, 70 vs 62 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, CS4 Touring or Solus TA31?

Cooper CS4 Touring, 67 vs 59 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, CS4 Touring or Solus TA31?

Cooper CS4 Touring, 64 vs 56 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, CS4 Touring or Solus TA31?

Cooper CS4 Touring, 67 vs 64 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, CS4 Touring or Solus TA31?

Cooper CS4 Touring, 66 vs 61 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, CS4 Touring or Solus TA31?

Cooper CS4 Touring, 64 vs 59 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology