Tests – · none yet Owners 54 · 16 reviews
Dunlop Signature HP vs Nexen N'Fera RU5 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 16 + 16 owner reviews. How we score
N'Fera RU5 is ahead, 71–58
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 72 · 16 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
54
Dry
N'Fera RU5 +1872Why this score
Source Signature HP N'Fera RU5 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 59 (est.) ≈ 71 (est.) Reviews found online 47 75 Signature HP: 60% × 59.2 (est.) + 40% × 46.6 = 54
N'Fera RU5: 60% × 70.8 (est.) + 40% × 74.8 = 72
No road tests of dry for Signature HP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for N'Fera RU5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
57
Wet
N'Fera RU5 +1774Why this score
Source Signature HP N'Fera RU5 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 61 (est.) ≈ 73 (est.) Reviews found online 52 76 Signature HP: 60% × 60.6 (est.) + 40% × 52.2 = 57
N'Fera RU5: 60% × 73.4 (est.) + 40% × 75.7 = 74
No road tests of wet for Signature HP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for N'Fera RU5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
59
Snow
N'Fera RU5 +160Why this score
Source Signature HP N'Fera RU5 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 64 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 51 52 Signature HP: 60% × 64.3 (est.) + 40% × 51 = 59
N'Fera RU5: 60% × 64.7 (est.) + 40% × 52.3 = 60
No road tests of snow for Signature HP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for N'Fera RU5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
58
Comfort
N'Fera RU5 +1674Why this score
Source Signature HP N'Fera RU5 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 53 76 Signature HP: 40% × 65.5 (est.) + 60% × 53.1 = 58
N'Fera RU5: 40% × 70.1 (est.) + 60% × 75.8 = 74
No road tests of comfort for Signature HP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for N'Fera RU5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
63
Noise
N'Fera RU5 +669Why this score
Source Signature HP N'Fera RU5 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 59 74 Signature HP: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 58.8 = 63
N'Fera RU5: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 73.6 = 69
No road tests of noise for Signature HP or N'Fera RU5. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
64
Treadwear
N'Fera RU5 +872Why this score
Source Signature HP N'Fera RU5 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 63 75 Signature HP: 60% × 65.1 (est.) + 40% × 62.6 = 64
N'Fera RU5: 60% × 69.7 (est.) + 40% × 75.3 = 72
No road tests of treadwear for Signature HP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for N'Fera RU5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
53
Handling (owners)
N'Fera RU5 +2073Why this score
Source Signature HP N'Fera RU5 Reviews found online 53 73
Scores at a glance
| Category | Dunlop Signature HP | Nexen N'Fera RU5 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 58 | 71 |
| Dry | 54 | 72 |
| Wet | 57 | 74 |
| Snow | 59 | 60 |
| Comfort | 58 | 74 |
| Noise | 63 | 69 |
| Treadwear | 64 | 72 |
| Handling (owners) | 53 | 73 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Signature HP
N'Fera RU5
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Signature HP
Pros
- Responsive handling and reliable cornering grip
- Affordable pricing and good overall value
- Smooth and quiet ride reported by many users
Cons
- Some users experience notable road noise
- Firm ride quality due to a harder rubber compound
- Tendency to develop temporary flat-spotting after sitting parked
Tire B N'Fera RU5
Pros
- Exceptional value and significantly lower price point compared to major competitor brands
- Impressive tread life and durability, with some users reporting high mileage and slow wear rates
- Strong grip and confident handling on both dry and wet roads
Cons
- Subpar traction and performance in snow and winter conditions, with specific complaints regarding ice and snow handling
- Noise levels are average, with some users noting they are not exceptionally quiet
- Mixed reviews on specialized winter-weather safety outside of mild rainy climates
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Dunlop Signature HP | B · Nexen N'Fera RU5 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season Ultra High Performance tires | All-Season Ultra High Performance tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 1 | 4 |
| Rim diameters | 17″ | 16″ – 18″ |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | 10/32″ |
| UTQG | 500 A A | 500 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | 45,000 mi | 65,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 50 psi | 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Dunlop Signature HP
Nexen N'Fera RU5
Winner: Nexen N'Fera RU5 — better handling, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score. Dunlop Signature HP rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 16 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Nexen N'Fera RU5 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 16 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Nexen N'Fera RU5 scores 73 vs 53 on handling.
Nexen N'Fera RU5 scores 72 vs 54 on dry.
Nexen N'Fera RU5 scores 74 vs 57 on wet.
Nexen N'Fera RU5 scores 74 vs 58 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Signature HP or N'Fera RU5?
Which is better in the wet, Signature HP or N'Fera RU5?
Nexen N'Fera RU5, 74 vs 57 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Signature HP or N'Fera RU5?
Nexen N'Fera RU5, 72 vs 54 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Signature HP or N'Fera RU5?
Neither, by our numbers: 59 vs 60 on the snow score, within 3 points.
Which is quieter, Signature HP or N'Fera RU5?
Nexen N'Fera RU5, 69 vs 63 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, Signature HP or N'Fera RU5?
Nexen N'Fera RU5, 74 vs 58 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Signature HP or N'Fera RU5?
Nexen N'Fera RU5, 72 vs 64 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology