Dunlop Signature II looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Dunlop Signature II vs Firestone Firehawk AS — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 10 + 8 owner reviews. How we score

Firehawk AS is ahead, 69–49

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Dunlop Signature II
Tire ADunlop

Signature II

All-Season tire

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 39 · 10 reviews

Firestone Firehawk AS
Tire BFirestone

Firehawk AS

All Season High Performance tires

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 69 · 8 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 47

    Dry

    Firehawk AS +23
    70
    Why this score
    SourceSignature IIFirehawk AS
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 55 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online3671

    Signature II: 60% × 54.7 (est.) + 40% × 36 = 47

    Firehawk AS: 60% × 69.1 (est.) + 40% × 70.6 = 70

    No road tests of dry for Signature II. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

    No road tests of dry for Firehawk AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 49

    Wet

    Firehawk AS +20
    69
    Why this score
    SourceSignature IIFirehawk AS
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 54 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online4168

    Signature II: 60% × 54.3 (est.) + 40% × 40.7 = 49

    Firehawk AS: 60% × 69.5 (est.) + 40% × 68.4 = 69

    No road tests of wet for Signature II. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Firehawk AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 53

    Snow

    Firehawk AS +13
    66
    Why this score
    SourceSignature IIFirehawk AS
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 61 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online4163

    Signature II: 60% × 61.1 (est.) + 40% × 40.7 = 53

    Firehawk AS: 60% × 68 (est.) + 40% × 62.5 = 66

    No road tests of snow for Signature II. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

    No road tests of snow for Firehawk AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 45

    Comfort

    Firehawk AS +24
    69
    Why this score
    SourceSignature IIFirehawk AS
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 62 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online3469

    Signature II: 40% × 61.8 (est.) + 60% × 34.4 = 45

    Firehawk AS: 40% × 68.7 (est.) + 60% × 68.7 = 69

    No road tests of comfort for Signature II. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for Firehawk AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 55

    Noise

    Firehawk AS +14
    69
    Why this score
    SourceSignature IIFirehawk AS
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online3874

    Signature II: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 37.5 = 55

    Firehawk AS: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 73.9 = 69

    No road tests of noise for Signature II or Firehawk AS. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 50

    Treadwear

    Firehawk AS +20
    70
    Why this score
    SourceSignature IIFirehawk AS
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 57 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online4072

    Signature II: 60% × 57 (est.) + 40% × 40 = 50

    Firehawk AS: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 71.8 = 70

    No road tests of treadwear for Signature II. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Firehawk AS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. –

    Handling (owners)

    No comparison
    67
    Why this score
    SourceSignature IIFirehawk AS
    Reviews found online–67
Scores at a glance
Dunlop Signature II vs Firestone Firehawk AS: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryDunlop Signature IIFirestone Firehawk AS
Relative Score 49 69
Dry 47 70
Wet 49 69
Snow 53 66
Comfort 45 69
Noise 55 69
Treadwear 50 70
Handling (owners) – 67

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

Signature II

± 8

Firehawk AS

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Signature II

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Tire B Firehawk AS

Pros

  • Exceptionally quiet and smooth ride quality
  • Strong dry handling and improved cornering response
  • Good water dispersion and wet road performance for most users

Cons

  • Potential susceptibility to hydroplaning in heavy rain according to select reviewers
  • Requires proper balancing to prevent irregular tread wear
All owner themes in the Firehawk AS review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Dunlop Signature II B · Firestone Firehawk AS
CategoryAll-Season tireAll Season High Performance tires
Vehicle type—Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available15
Rim diameters17″15″ – 18″
Tread depth10/32″11/32″
UTQG620 A B480 A A
Treadwear warranty65,000 mi50,000 mi
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure51 psi44 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Dunlop Signature II

Firestone Firehawk AS

Winner: Firestone Firehawk AS — better comfort, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score. Dunlop Signature II rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 10 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Firestone Firehawk AS rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 8 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Firestone Firehawk AS scores 69 vs 45 on comfort.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Firestone Firehawk AS scores 70 vs 47 on dry.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Firestone Firehawk AS scores 69 vs 49 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Firestone Firehawk AS scores 70 vs 50 on treadwear.

Tire A · Dunlop Signature II
Tire B · Firestone Firehawk AS

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Signature II or Firehawk AS?

Which is better in the wet, Signature II or Firehawk AS?

Firestone Firehawk AS, 69 vs 49 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Signature II or Firehawk AS?

Firestone Firehawk AS, 70 vs 47 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Signature II or Firehawk AS?

Firestone Firehawk AS, 66 vs 53 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, Signature II or Firehawk AS?

Firestone Firehawk AS, 69 vs 55 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Signature II or Firehawk AS?

Firestone Firehawk AS, 69 vs 45 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Signature II or Firehawk AS?

Firestone Firehawk AS, 70 vs 50 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology