Head-to-head Updated

Dunlop SP Sport 2030 vs Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 2 road tests and 9 + 1,598 owner reviews. How we score

Kinergy Eco 2 is ahead, 60–39

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Dunlop SP Sport 2030
Tire ADunlop

SP Sport 2030

Summer

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 25 · 9 reviews

Hankook Kinergy Eco 2
Tire BHankook

Kinergy Eco 2

Summer

± 6

Tests 73 · 2 tests Owners 50 · 1,598 reviews

Best test result: #2 of 15 in 2019 Summer and All Season Tyre Test (noise)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 41

    Dry

    Kinergy Eco 2 +22
    63
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport 2030Kinergy Eco 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests≈ 51 (est.)72
    Reviews found online2650

    SP Sport 2030: 60% × 50.7 (est.) + 40% × 26.3 = 41

    Kinergy Eco 2: 60% × 71.7 + 40% × 49.5 = 63

    No road tests of dry for SP Sport 2030. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 46

    Wet

    Kinergy Eco 2 +20
    66
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport 2030Kinergy Eco 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests≈ 52 (est.)75
    Reviews found online3653

    SP Sport 2030: 60% × 51.8 (est.) + 40% × 36.2 = 46

    Kinergy Eco 2: 60% × 74.7 + 40% × 53.4 = 66

    No road tests of wet for SP Sport 2030. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 33

    Comfort

    Kinergy Eco 2 +20
    53
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport 2030Kinergy Eco 2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 58 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online1745

    SP Sport 2030: 40% × 58.1 (est.) + 60% × 16.8 = 33

    Kinergy Eco 2: 40% × 63.9 (est.) + 60% × 45.3 = 53

    No road tests of comfort for SP Sport 2030. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.21).

    No road tests of comfort for Kinergy Eco 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.21).

  4. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    71
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport 2030Kinergy Eco 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests–75
    Reviews found online–≈ 66 (est.)

    Kinergy Eco 2: 60% × 74.5 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 71

    No owner ratings of noise for Kinergy Eco 2. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  5. 35

    Treadwear

    Kinergy Eco 2 +20
    55
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport 2030Kinergy Eco 2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 48 (est.)≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online1648

    SP Sport 2030: 60% × 48.4 (est.) + 40% × 15.7 = 35

    Kinergy Eco 2: 60% × 59.7 (est.) + 40% × 47.5 = 55

    No road tests of treadwear for SP Sport 2030. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Kinergy Eco 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  6. 25

    Handling (owners)

    Kinergy Eco 2 +24
    49
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport 2030Kinergy Eco 2
    Reviews found online2549
  7. –

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    75
    Why this score
    SourceSP Sport 2030Kinergy Eco 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests–75
Scores at a glance
Dunlop SP Sport 2030 vs Hankook Kinergy Eco 2: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryDunlop SP Sport 2030Hankook Kinergy Eco 2
Relative Score 39 60
Dry 41 63
Wet 46 66
Comfort 33 53
Noise – 71
Treadwear 35 55
Handling (owners) 25 49
Efficiency – 75

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

SP Sport 2030

± 6

Kinergy Eco 2

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A SP Sport 2030

Pros

  • Good dry grip and handling performance
  • Acceptable comfort levels on select vehicles compared to prior tires
  • Decent performance in light snow and ice conditions due to a softer compound

Cons

  • Terrible and very annoying road noise on anything other than completely smooth roads
  • Rapid and premature tread wear, with many users needing replacements between 8,000 and 18,000 miles
  • Poor wet weather performance and slippery handling on wet surfaces
All owner themes in the SP Sport 2030 review

Tire B Kinergy Eco 2

Pros

  • Reliable dry and wet road grip
  • Good value for the price point
  • Slow and even tread wear / long-lasting durability

Cons

  • Notable road noise reported by some users
  • Stiff ride quality that can amplify road bumps
  • Reduced performance and grip in wet or cold conditions as tread wears down
All owner themes in the Kinergy Eco 2 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Dunlop SP Sport 2030 B · Hankook Kinergy Eco 2
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available148
Rim diameters15″13″ – 17″
UTQG280 - 360 A - B A - B200 - 400 A - B A

Which one should you actually buy?

Dunlop SP Sport 2030

Hankook Kinergy Eco 2

Winner: Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 — better handling, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score. Dunlop SP Sport 2030 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 9 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 scores 49 vs 25 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 scores 63 vs 41 on dry.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 scores 66 vs 46 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Hankook Kinergy Eco 2 scores 53 vs 33 on comfort.

Tire A · Dunlop SP Sport 2030
Tire B · Hankook Kinergy Eco 2

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

SP Sport 2030 or Kinergy Eco 2?

Which is better in the wet, SP Sport 2030 or Kinergy Eco 2?

Hankook Kinergy Eco 2, 66 vs 46 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, SP Sport 2030 or Kinergy Eco 2?

Hankook Kinergy Eco 2, 63 vs 41 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, SP Sport 2030 or Kinergy Eco 2?

Hankook Kinergy Eco 2, 53 vs 33 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, SP Sport 2030 or Kinergy Eco 2?

Hankook Kinergy Eco 2, 55 vs 35 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology