Tests – · none yet Owners 72 · 726 reviews
Riken All Star 2 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Dunlop SP Sport FastResponse vs Riken All Star 2 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 726 + 3 owner reviews. How we score
SP Sport FastResponse is ahead, 72–53
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 44 · 3 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
72
Dry
SP Sport FastResponse +1755Why this score
Source SP Sport FastResponse All Star 2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 60 (est.) Reviews found online 75 48 SP Sport FastResponse: 60% × 70.7 (est.) + 40% × 75 = 72
All Star 2: 60% × 59.9 (est.) + 40% × 48.2 = 55
No road tests of dry for SP Sport FastResponse. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for All Star 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
75
Wet
SP Sport FastResponse +2055Why this score
Source SP Sport FastResponse All Star 2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 73 (est.) ≈ 58 (est.) Reviews found online 76 50 SP Sport FastResponse: 60% × 73.4 (est.) + 40% × 76.2 = 75
All Star 2: 60% × 58.5 (est.) + 40% × 49.6 = 55
No road tests of wet for SP Sport FastResponse. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for All Star 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
70
Comfort
SP Sport FastResponse +1159Why this score
Source SP Sport FastResponse All Star 2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 71 49 SP Sport FastResponse: 60% × 69.4 (est.) + 40% × 70.6 = 70
All Star 2: 60% × 65.6 (est.) + 40% × 48.9 = 59
No road tests of comfort for SP Sport FastResponse or All Star 2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
66
Treadwear
SP Sport FastResponse +2046Why this score
Source SP Sport FastResponse All Star 2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 55 (est.) Reviews found online 66 32 SP Sport FastResponse: 60% × 65.6 (est.) + 40% × 65.7 = 66
All Star 2: 60% × 55.2 (est.) + 40% × 31.9 = 46
No road tests of treadwear for SP Sport FastResponse. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for All Star 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
72
Handling (owners)
SP Sport FastResponse +2547Why this score
Source SP Sport FastResponse All Star 2 Reviews found online 72 47
Scores at a glance
| Category | Dunlop SP Sport FastResponse | Riken All Star 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 72 | 53 |
| Dry | 72 | 55 |
| Wet | 75 | 55 |
| Comfort | 70 | 59 |
| Treadwear | 66 | 46 |
| Handling (owners) | 72 | 47 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
SP Sport FastResponse
All Star 2
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A SP Sport FastResponse
Pros
- Exceptional wet weather performance and hydroplaning resistance
- Low road noise and high initial ride comfort
- Precise steering response and solid dry cornering grip
Cons
- Faster tread wear reported by some spirited drivers
- Softer sidewalls can introduce slight flex or floatiness during high-speed maneuvers
- Road noise can increase noticeably as the tires near the end of their lifespan
Tire B All Star 2
Pros
- Attractive low price point
- Acceptable noise levels for budget-conscious drivers
- Adequate stopping performance in light city conditions
Cons
- Poor tread longevity and durability
- Failure to meet safety inspection standards within a year
- Inconsistent quality compared to premium tire brands
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Dunlop SP Sport FastResponse | B · Riken All Star 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer Touring tires |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 7 | — |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 17″ | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Dunlop SP Sport FastResponse
Riken All Star 2
Winner: Dunlop SP Sport FastResponse — better handling, wet and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score. Riken All Star 2 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 3 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Dunlop SP Sport FastResponse scores 72 vs 47 on handling.
Dunlop SP Sport FastResponse scores 75 vs 55 on wet.
Dunlop SP Sport FastResponse scores 66 vs 46 on treadwear.
Dunlop SP Sport FastResponse scores 72 vs 55 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
SP Sport FastResponse or All Star 2?
Which is better in the wet, SP Sport FastResponse or All Star 2?
Dunlop SP Sport FastResponse, 75 vs 55 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, SP Sport FastResponse or All Star 2?
Dunlop SP Sport FastResponse, 72 vs 55 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, SP Sport FastResponse or All Star 2?
Dunlop SP Sport FastResponse, 70 vs 59 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, SP Sport FastResponse or All Star 2?
Dunlop SP Sport FastResponse, 66 vs 46 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology