Tests – · none yet Owners 52 · 7 reviews
Dunlop SP Touring T1 vs Kumho Ecowing ES31 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 7 + 9,931 owner reviews. How we score
Ecowing ES31 is ahead, 63–56
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 62 · 9,931 reviews
“Certa vez, nos comentários de um vídeo sobre pneus no YouTube, vi a galera que trabalha com Uber falando bem do Ecowing ES31, relatando que tem ótima durabilidade. Resolvi arriscar e coloquei, são ótimos mesmo, já rodei 18 mil km e estão impecáveis ainda.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
55
Dry
Ecowing ES31 +964Why this score
Source SP Touring T1 Ecowing ES31 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 60 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 48 62 SP Touring T1: 60% × 59.7 (est.) + 40% × 47.9 = 55
Ecowing ES31: 60% × 65.5 (est.) + 40% × 61.9 = 64
No road tests of dry for SP Touring T1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for Ecowing ES31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
57
Wet
Ecowing ES31 +663Why this score
Source SP Touring T1 Ecowing ES31 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 60 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 51 60 SP Touring T1: 60% × 60.1 (est.) + 40% × 51.3 = 57
Ecowing ES31: 60% × 64.9 (est.) + 40% × 60.1 = 63
No road tests of wet for SP Touring T1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Ecowing ES31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
58
Comfort
Ecowing ES31 +563Why this score
Source SP Touring T1 Ecowing ES31 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 53 61 SP Touring T1: 40% × 65.6 (est.) + 60% × 53.4 = 58
Ecowing ES31: 40% × 67.1 (est.) + 60% × 60.8 = 63
No road tests of comfort for SP Touring T1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Ecowing ES31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
60
Treadwear
Ecowing ES31 +666Why this score
Source SP Touring T1 Ecowing ES31 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 63 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 56 65 SP Touring T1: 60% × 62.8 (est.) + 40% × 56.1 = 60
Ecowing ES31: 60% × 65.9 (est.) + 40% × 64.9 = 66
No road tests of treadwear for SP Touring T1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Ecowing ES31. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
51
Handling (owners)
Ecowing ES31 +455Why this score
Source SP Touring T1 Ecowing ES31 Reviews found online 51 55
Scores at a glance
| Category | Dunlop SP Touring T1 | Kumho Ecowing ES31 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 56 | 63 |
| Dry | 55 | 64 |
| Wet | 57 | 63 |
| Comfort | 58 | 63 |
| Treadwear | 60 | 66 |
| Handling (owners) | 51 | 55 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
SP Touring T1
Ecowing ES31
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A SP Touring T1
Pros
- Highly competitive, budget-friendly price point
- Reported durability and longevity by some users
Cons
- Extremely poor wet-weather traction and braking performance
- High susceptibility to sidewall bubbling and structural failure
- Frequent need for repairs and premature degradation
Tire B Ecowing ES31
Pros
- Exceptional value and affordability compared to premium brand alternatives
- Low road noise and enhanced ride comfort over bumps and speed humps
- Improved fuel economy and reduced rolling resistance
Cons
- Polarizing wet weather performance, with some users reporting frightening losses of traction
- Soft sidewalls that can feel vague during quick lane changes or lead to vulnerability against curbs and potholes
- Occasional reports of accelerated or uneven tread wear on outer shoulders
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Dunlop SP Touring T1
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Kumho Ecowing ES31
The Kumho Ecowing ES31 is generally viewed as an affordable, budget-friendly mid-range summer tire that offers good durability and dry grip, making it popular among commuters and rideshare drivers. However, opinions are mixed regarding its wet weather performance, with some users reporting poor wet grip while others find it acceptable for cautious, everyday driving.
“Kumho ecowing es31 é o melhor custo benefício, tem classificação B de consumo e C de aderência, eu já tive pneu da Kumho e gostei da aderência e é um pneu macio pra conforto. Continental Power Contact 2 tbm é uma boa opção. Eu não recomendo xbri, farroad, ling long, speedmax, pois tem durabilidade baixa.”
“Tengo las kumho ecowing es31 y ninguna queja, siempre respondieron bien aunque la verdad manejo como un abuelo, solo una vez frene fuerte en la panamericana y nunca bloquearon, las volveria a poner en otro auto.”
“The EU label is all over the place. But none have A-A-A as far as I can tell. Did not score good in wet in the test on the site. Wear rate on a Mazda 2 should be decent with almost anything. Why not look at all seasons? Sava All weather and Kumho Solus are closest to the ES31 in price.”
Based on 12 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Dunlop SP Touring T1 | B · Kumho Ecowing ES31 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 39 |
| Rim diameters | — | 13″ – 18″ |
| UTQG | 500 B A - B | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Dunlop SP Touring T1
Kumho Ecowing ES31
Winner: Kumho Ecowing ES31 — better dry, wet and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score. Dunlop SP Touring T1 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 7 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Kumho Ecowing ES31 scores 64 vs 55 on dry.
Kumho Ecowing ES31 scores 63 vs 57 on wet.
Kumho Ecowing ES31 scores 66 vs 60 on treadwear.
Kumho Ecowing ES31 scores 63 vs 58 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
SP Touring T1 or Ecowing ES31?
Which is better in the wet, SP Touring T1 or Ecowing ES31?
Kumho Ecowing ES31, 63 vs 57 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, SP Touring T1 or Ecowing ES31?
Kumho Ecowing ES31, 64 vs 55 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, SP Touring T1 or Ecowing ES31?
Kumho Ecowing ES31, 63 vs 58 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, SP Touring T1 or Ecowing ES31?
Kumho Ecowing ES31, 66 vs 60 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology