Tests – · none yet Owners 57 · 7 reviews
Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Dunlop SP Touring T1 vs Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 7 + 11 owner reviews. How we score
Too close to call: SP Touring T1 60, Aspec A349 BluEarth 61.
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 59 · 11 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
59
Dry
Level59Why this score
Source SP Touring T1 Aspec A349 BluEarth Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 62 (est.) ≈ 62 (est.) Reviews found online 54 55 SP Touring T1: 60% × 62.3 (est.) + 40% × 54.2 = 59
Aspec A349 BluEarth: 60% × 62.4 (est.) + 40% × 54.5 = 59
No road tests of dry for SP Touring T1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for Aspec A349 BluEarth. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
60
Wet
SP Touring T1 +159Why this score
Source SP Touring T1 Aspec A349 BluEarth Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 62 (est.) ≈ 62 (est.) Reviews found online 57 55 SP Touring T1: 60% × 62.4 (est.) + 40% × 56.6 = 60
Aspec A349 BluEarth: 60% × 61.5 (est.) + 40% × 55 = 59
No road tests of wet for SP Touring T1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for Aspec A349 BluEarth. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
64
Comfort
SP Touring T1 +262Why this score
Source SP Touring T1 Aspec A349 BluEarth Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 60 54 SP Touring T1: 60% × 67.5 (est.) + 40% × 59.7 = 64
Aspec A349 BluEarth: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 54.1 = 62
No road tests of comfort for SP Touring T1 or Aspec A349 BluEarth. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
63
Treadwear
Aspec A349 BluEarth +467Why this score
Source SP Touring T1 Aspec A349 BluEarth Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 64 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 61 69 SP Touring T1: 60% × 64.1 (est.) + 40% × 60.8 = 63
Aspec A349 BluEarth: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 68.5 = 67
No road tests of treadwear for SP Touring T1. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for Aspec A349 BluEarth. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
58
Handling (owners)
Aspec A349 BluEarth +361Why this score
Source SP Touring T1 Aspec A349 BluEarth Reviews found online 58 61
Scores at a glance
| Category | Dunlop SP Touring T1 | Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 60 | 61 |
| Dry | 59 | 59 |
| Wet | 60 | 59 |
| Comfort | 64 | 62 |
| Treadwear | 63 | 67 |
| Handling (owners) | 58 | 61 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
SP Touring T1
Aspec A349 BluEarth
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A SP Touring T1
Pros
- Highly competitive, budget-friendly price point
- Reported durability and longevity by some users
Cons
- Extremely poor wet-weather traction and braking performance
- High susceptibility to sidewall bubbling and structural failure
- Frequent need for repairs and premature degradation
Tire B Aspec A349 BluEarth
Pros
- Impressive tread life and durability for an OEM tire
- Quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Reliable handling and lateral grip in dry conditions
Cons
- Poor traction and tendency to spin on wet surfaces
- High price point compared to aftermarket competitors
- Mediocre cornering ability and grip during aggressive maneuvers
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Dunlop SP Touring T1 | B · Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
Which one should you actually buy?
Dunlop SP Touring T1
Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth
Too close to call: Dunlop SP Touring T1 and Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth are within 2 points overall. Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth is stronger on treadwear. Dunlop SP Touring T1 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 7 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 11 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth scores 67 vs 63 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
SP Touring T1 or Aspec A349 BluEarth?
Which is better in the wet, SP Touring T1 or Aspec A349 BluEarth?
Neither, by our numbers: 60 vs 59 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, SP Touring T1 or Aspec A349 BluEarth?
Neither, by our numbers: 59 vs 59 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, SP Touring T1 or Aspec A349 BluEarth?
Neither, by our numbers: 64 vs 62 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, SP Touring T1 or Aspec A349 BluEarth?
Yokohama Aspec A349 BluEarth, 67 vs 63 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology