Head-to-head Updated

Falken Azenis FK510 vs Goodyear Ultra Grip Performance 2 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 31 + 0 road tests and 907 + 13 owner reviews. How we score

Different seasons: Azenis FK510 and Ultra Grip Performance 2 are each scored against tires of their own season.

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Falken Azenis FK510
Tire AFalken

Azenis FK510

Summer

± 5

Tests 74 · 31 tests Owners 66 · 907 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 9 in 2018 Sport Auto 19 inch UHP and Track Day Tyre Test (wet braking)

“I have Fallen FK510s and live where it rains 300 days a year, they perform great and I'm sure the 520 is even better”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 74

    Dry

    Azenis FK510 +27
    47
    Why this score
    SourceAzenis FK510Ultra Grip Performance 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 28 / – tests73≈ 54 (est.)
    Reviews found online7535

    Azenis FK510: 60% × 72.9 + 40% × 75.4 = 74

    Ultra Grip Performance 2: 60% × 54.3 (est.) + 40% × 35.3 = 47

    No road tests of dry for Ultra Grip Performance 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 85

    Wet

    Azenis FK510 +35
    50
    Why this score
    SourceAzenis FK510Ultra Grip Performance 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 29 / – tests89≈ 55 (est.)
    Reviews found online7842

    Azenis FK510: 60% × 89 + 40% × 78.3 = 85

    Ultra Grip Performance 2: 60% × 54.7 (est.) + 40% × 41.8 = 50

    No road tests of wet for Ultra Grip Performance 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 55

    Snow

    Azenis FK510 +13
    42
    Why this score
    SourceAzenis FK510Ultra Grip Performance 2
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 61 (est.)≈ 53 (est.)
    Reviews found online4624

    Azenis FK510: 60% × 61.3 (est.) + 40% × 45.5 = 55

    Ultra Grip Performance 2: 60% × 53.4 (est.) + 40% × 24.2 = 42

    No road tests of snow for Azenis FK510. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

    No road tests of snow for Ultra Grip Performance 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 57

    Comfort

    Azenis FK510 +6
    51
    Why this score
    SourceAzenis FK510Ultra Grip Performance 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / – tests42≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online6843

    Azenis FK510: 40% × 41.7 + 60% × 67.6 = 57

    Ultra Grip Performance 2: 40% × 64.3 (est.) + 60% × 42.8 = 51

    No road tests of comfort for Ultra Grip Performance 2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 67

    Noise

    Azenis FK510 +9
    58
    Why this score
    SourceAzenis FK510Ultra Grip Performance 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 18 / – tests66≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online6744

    Azenis FK510: 60% × 66 + 40% × 67.3 = 67

    Ultra Grip Performance 2: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 44.3 = 58

    No road tests of noise for Ultra Grip Performance 2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 66

    Treadwear

    Azenis FK510 +19
    47
    Why this score
    SourceAzenis FK510Ultra Grip Performance 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 5 / – tests73≈ 55 (est.)
    Reviews found online5435

    Azenis FK510: 60% × 73.1 + 40% × 54.2 = 66

    Ultra Grip Performance 2: 60% × 55.3 (est.) + 40% × 34.9 = 47

    No road tests of treadwear for Ultra Grip Performance 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 72

    Handling (owners)

    Azenis FK510 +30
    42
    Why this score
    SourceAzenis FK510Ultra Grip Performance 2
    Reviews found online7242
  8. 51

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceAzenis FK510Ultra Grip Performance 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 19 / – tests51–
Scores at a glance
Falken Azenis FK510 vs Goodyear Ultra Grip Performance 2: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryFalken Azenis FK510Goodyear Ultra Grip Performance 2
Relative Score 71 48
Dry 74 47
Wet 85 50
Snow 55 42
Comfort 57 51
Noise 67 58
Treadwear 66 47
Handling (owners) 72 42
Efficiency 51 –

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 5

Azenis FK510

± 8

Ultra Grip Performance 2

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryAzenis FK510Ultra Grip Performance 2ΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #7/10 2025 Tire Rack UUHP Summer Tyre Test #4/12 2011 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Azenis FK510

Pros

  • Outstanding grip in both wet and dry conditions
  • Exceptional value and lower price point compared to premium brands
  • Smooth and comfortable ride quality that absorbs road imperfections well

Cons

  • Accelerated tread wear and shorter overall lifespan
  • Softer sidewalls can result in slightly delayed initial steering response or a feeling of looseness during aggressive high-speed maneuvers
  • Occasional reports of increased tire noise or harshness on specific rough or concrete road surfaces
All owner themes in the Azenis FK510 review

Tire B Ultra Grip Performance 2

Pros

  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality on dry and wet tarmac
  • Agile handling and reliable grip in wet conditions and light-to-medium snow
  • Good directional tread design for effective water and slush evacuation

Cons

  • Severely lacking traction and grip on packed snow and ice according to dissatisfied users
  • Triggers frequent ABS activation and wheel spin during acceleration and braking in wintry precipitation
  • Vague handling feel on tarmac for certain drivers
All owner themes in the Ultra Grip Performance 2 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Falken Azenis FK510

Mixed

Community members frequently view the Falken Azenis FK510 as an affordable, budget-friendly alternative to premium tires like Michelin Pilot Sports, offering strong wet weather grip and good everyday road comfort. However, opinions are mixed due to rapid treadwear, with multiple drivers reporting bald tires in 10,000 to 15,000 miles or poor durability during track and autocross sessions. Furthermore, some users note compromises in steering response, road noise, and overall performance compared to top-tier max performance tires.

r/CarTrackDays ·4 upvotes ·2019-01-27

“Upgrading tires from Falken Azenis FK510, looking for recommendations Hey all, I drive a V6 1LE camaro, i've been doing a lot of open practice sessions at a small track (the driveway in austin, tx), long story short I bought brand new Azenis FK510 two months ago, only about 4k street miles, and after about 3 hours of track time they're pretty much done....mostly from noob mistakes like overcooking the entry and destroying the front shoulders, and having the rear tires way too overinflated so the shoulders are fine but the center are down to the wear bars. Even under ideal conditions and purposely driving slower and smoother I can't see these lasting much more than 4-5 hours of track time, I'm just surprised to see these tires wear down very very quickly under hard driving and overheat somewhat quickly, these are awesome daily driving tires but I'm looking for more track performance. I'm currently debating between pilot sport 4s, bridgestone re-71r, firehawk indy 500. This is more of a philosophical question, I'm looking at a wide variety of treadwear tires, I'm curious how you guys decide on what treadwear tires to run and how you decide between wear, price, and grip. I'm leaning towards the RE-71r right now, I figure if I'm burning through my tires in a few months anyways might as well do it with sticky tires since my falkens didn't last long anyways... Read more”

civicx.com ·1 upvote ·2020-11-11

“I think Vredestein was more popular in Europe but Tire Rack has been expanding their presence in the US. Some of their tires are kinda unique bridging capabilities of different tire categories. There's another model they have called the Quatrac 5 which is an all-season sportier touring tire that has the severe snow duty rating like winter tires, but can be driven year round unlike winter tires. So they were on my radar because of that. (I'm "that car guy" who most of my friends and family consult when buying car stuff like tires so I find myself researching too many categories of tires. ?) This Hypertrac AS is a newer model and more focused on performance, but it seems to be a UHPAS option with more comfort than similar tires. If you're experiencing that lack of performance from the OE Goodyears you should look at those Falken FK510s. They're a summer tire but the sidewalls are pretty soft. They're supposed to be comfier than usual for a summer tire. You'll get more grip than the stock tires. They might not be much quieter or smoother riding but probably won't be any worse.”

r/tires ·2 upvotes ·2022-02-08

“Falken Azenis FK510 prices? Anyone know why the prices for Falken Azenis FK510's went up 25% or more in the last month? 235/40R18 went from $154 to $192. The whole benefit of these tires is that they offer PS4S performance for way less money. Now, you midaswhale just buy the Michelins. I haven't seen any other summer tires make that kind of a jump in price. I know Falken announced a price increase for 2022, but it was only like 5%. What's the dealio? Read more”

Top themes
#budget friendly pricing#wet weather traction#fast treadwear#track durability concerns#ride comfort#cabin road noise#daily street driving

Based on 63 community posts

Tire B

Goodyear Ultra Grip Performance 2

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Falken Azenis FK510 B · Goodyear Ultra Grip Performance 2
CategorySummerWinter
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available936
Rim diameters17″ – 22″16″ – 17″
Tread depth10/32″8/32″
UTQG300 A A—
SidewallBlackwallBlackwall
Max pressure50 psi51 psi
Sizes in common11

Which one should you actually buy?

Falken Azenis FK510

Goodyear Ultra Grip Performance 2

Built for different seasons: Goodyear Ultra Grip Performance 2 is a winter tire, Falken Azenis FK510 a summer tire. Each score is measured against tires of its own season, so the two are not ranked against each other — pick by the season you drive in.

Tire A · Falken Azenis FK510
Tire B · Goodyear Ultra Grip Performance 2

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology