Head-to-head Updated

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS200 vs Firestone All Season — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 1 road tests and 62 + 42 owner reviews. How we score

All Season is ahead, 73–68

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS200
Tire AFalken

EUROALL SEASON AS200

All Season

± 8

Tests 68 · 1 test Owners 68 · 62 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 11 in 2017 All Season VS Winter Tyre Test (noise)

Firestone All Season
Tire BFirestone

All Season

All Season Touring tires

± 9

Tests – · 1 test Owners 75 · 42 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 65

    Dry

    All Season +10
    75
    Why this score
    SourceEUROALL SEASON AS200All Season
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests68≈ 72 (est.)
    Reviews found online6278

    EUROALL SEASON AS200: 60% × 67.8 + 40% × 61.8 = 65

    All Season: 60% × 72.4 (est.) + 40% × 78.3 = 75

    No road tests of dry for All Season. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 73

    Wet

    All Season +4
    77
    Why this score
    SourceEUROALL SEASON AS200All Season
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests72≈ 76 (est.)
    Reviews found online7579

    EUROALL SEASON AS200: 60% × 72.4 + 40% × 74.5 = 73

    All Season: 60% × 75.5 (est.) + 40% × 79.4 = 77

    No road tests of wet for All Season. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 64

    Snow

    All Season +5
    69
    Why this score
    SourceEUROALL SEASON AS200All Season
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests62≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online6768

    EUROALL SEASON AS200: 60% × 62.1 + 40% × 66.5 = 64

    All Season: 60% × 69.8 (est.) + 40% × 68.2 = 69

    No road tests of snow for All Season. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 68

    Comfort

    All Season +3
    71
    Why this score
    SourceEUROALL SEASON AS200All Season
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online6872

    EUROALL SEASON AS200: 40% × 68.9 (est.) + 60% × 67.8 = 68

    All Season: 40% × 69.7 (est.) + 60% × 72.1 = 71

    No road tests of comfort for EUROALL SEASON AS200 or All Season. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    69
    Why this score
    SourceEUROALL SEASON AS200All Season
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online–72

    All Season: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 71.7 = 69

    No road tests of noise for All Season. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 67

    Treadwear

    All Season +2
    69
    Why this score
    SourceEUROALL SEASON AS200All Season
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 66 (est.)67
    Reviews found online6773

    EUROALL SEASON AS200: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 67.2 = 67

    All Season: 60% × 66.9 + 40% × 72.9 = 69

    No road tests of treadwear for EUROALL SEASON AS200. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 68

    Handling (owners)

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceEUROALL SEASON AS200All Season
    Reviews found online68–
  8. 52

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceEUROALL SEASON AS200All Season
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests52–
Scores at a glance
Falken EUROALL SEASON AS200 vs Firestone All Season: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryFalken EUROALL SEASON AS200Firestone All Season
Relative Score 68 73
Dry 65 75
Wet 73 77
Snow 64 69
Comfort 68 71
Noise – 69
Treadwear 67 69
Handling (owners) 68 –
Efficiency 52 –

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

EUROALL SEASON AS200

± 9

All Season

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryEUROALL SEASON AS200All SeasonΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #7/8 2018 Auto Express All Season Tyre Test #6/8 2022 Consumer Reports All-Season Tires – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A EUROALL SEASON AS200

Pros

  • Exceptional wet weather performance and aquaplaning resistance
  • High value for money compared to premium brands
  • Quiet and comfortable ride quality

Cons

  • Tires can feel soft or lose traction easily in very hot summer temperatures
  • Minor tendencies toward understeer when pushed hard
  • Some reports of faster tread wear or deformation over time
All owner themes in the EUROALL SEASON AS200 review

Tire B All Season

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Falken EUROALL SEASON AS200 B · Firestone All Season
CategoryAll SeasonAll Season Touring tires
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available262
Rim diameters15″ – 16″14″ – 20″
Tread depth—10/32″
UTQG—560 A B
Treadwear warranty—65,000 mi
Sidewall—Blackwall
Max pressure—44 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Falken EUROALL SEASON AS200

Firestone All Season

Winner: Firestone All Season — better dry, snow and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Firestone All Season scores 75 vs 65 on dry.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Firestone All Season scores 69 vs 64 on snow.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Firestone All Season scores 77 vs 73 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Firestone All Season scores 71 vs 68 on comfort.

Tire A · Falken EUROALL SEASON AS200
Tire B · Firestone All Season

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

EUROALL SEASON AS200 or All Season?

Which is better in the wet, EUROALL SEASON AS200 or All Season?

Firestone All Season, 77 vs 73 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, EUROALL SEASON AS200 or All Season?

Firestone All Season, 75 vs 65 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, EUROALL SEASON AS200 or All Season?

Firestone All Season, 69 vs 64 on our snow score.

Which is more comfortable, EUROALL SEASON AS200 or All Season?

Firestone All Season, 71 vs 68 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, EUROALL SEASON AS200 or All Season?

Neither, by our numbers: 67 vs 69 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology