Hankook Icebear W440 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Falken Eurowinter HS01 vs Hankook Icebear W440 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 14 + 0 road tests and 35 + 5 owner reviews. How we score

Eurowinter HS01 is ahead, 80–72

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Falken Eurowinter HS01
Tire AFalken

Eurowinter HS01

Winter

± 5

Tests 70 · 14 tests Owners 82 · 35 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2018 Auto Bild Winter Tyre Test (straight aquaplaning)

Hankook Icebear W440
Tire BHankook

Icebear W440

Winter

± 8Provisional

Tests – · none yet Owners 73 · 5 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 77

    Dry

    Eurowinter HS01 +7
    70
    Why this score
    SourceEurowinter HS01Icebear W440
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 10 / – tests74≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online8272

    Eurowinter HS01: 60% × 73.6 + 40% × 82.4 = 77

    Icebear W440: 60% × 69.6 (est.) + 40% × 71.7 = 70

    No road tests of dry for Icebear W440. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 86

    Wet

    Eurowinter HS01 +10
    76
    Why this score
    SourceEurowinter HS01Icebear W440
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 14 / – tests85≈ 74 (est.)
    Reviews found online8778

    Eurowinter HS01: 60% × 84.6 + 40% × 87 = 86

    Icebear W440: 60% × 74.5 (est.) + 40% × 77.5 = 76

    No road tests of wet for Icebear W440. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 68

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceEurowinter HS01Icebear W440
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 14 / – tests61–
    Reviews found online79–

    Eurowinter HS01: 60% × 60.6 + 40% × 78.8 = 68

  4. 75

    Comfort

    Eurowinter HS01 +3
    72
    Why this score
    SourceEurowinter HS01Icebear W440
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests69≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online7973

    Eurowinter HS01: 40% × 68.7 + 60% × 78.5 = 75

    Icebear W440: 40% × 69.9 (est.) + 60% × 73.1 = 72

    No road tests of comfort for Icebear W440. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 55

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceEurowinter HS01Icebear W440
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 9 / – tests41–
    Reviews found online77–

    Eurowinter HS01: 60% × 40.7 + 40% × 76.8 = 55

  6. 76

    Treadwear

    Eurowinter HS01 +8
    68
    Why this score
    SourceEurowinter HS01Icebear W440
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / – tests71≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online8270

    Eurowinter HS01: 60% × 71.3 + 40% × 82.1 = 76

    Icebear W440: 60% × 67.5 (est.) + 40% × 70 = 68

    No road tests of treadwear for Icebear W440. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 77

    Handling (owners)

    Eurowinter HS01 +5
    72
    Why this score
    SourceEurowinter HS01Icebear W440
    Reviews found online7772
  8. 12

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceEurowinter HS01Icebear W440
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 10 / – tests12–
Scores at a glance
Falken Eurowinter HS01 vs Hankook Icebear W440: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryFalken Eurowinter HS01Hankook Icebear W440
Relative Score 80 72
Dry 77 70
Wet 86 76
Snow 68 –
Comfort 75 72
Noise 55 –
Treadwear 76 68
Handling (owners) 77 72
Efficiency 12 –

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 5

Eurowinter HS01

± 8

Icebear W440

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Eurowinter HS01

Pros

  • Exceptional wet-weather grip and aquaplaning resistance
  • Strong traction and handling in deep snow and ice
  • High value-to-price ratio compared to premium competitors

Cons

  • Higher rolling resistance noted by some users
  • Inconsistent braking confidence on wet or slick asphalt for a small subset of drivers
  • Increased road noise at higher speeds or when over-inflated
All owner themes in the Eurowinter HS01 review

Tire B Icebear W440

Pros

  • Excellent traction and confidence on snow and ice
  • High value-for-money proposition compared to premium brands
  • Noticeable performance improvement for rear-wheel-drive vehicles

Cons

  • Noticeable 'slippery' sensation during the initial 100-mile break-in period
  • Performance is strictly categorized as a budget-friendly option rather than a top-tier premium performer
  • Mixed feedback on overall refinement compared to more expensive alternatives
All owner themes in the Icebear W440 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Falken Eurowinter HS01 B · Hankook Icebear W440
CategoryWinterWinter
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available99—
Rim diameters13″ – 21″—
Tread depth11/32″—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure50 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Falken Eurowinter HS01

Hankook Icebear W440

Winner: Falken Eurowinter HS01 — better wet, treadwear and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Hankook Icebear W440 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 5 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Falken Eurowinter HS01 scores 86 vs 76 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Falken Eurowinter HS01 scores 76 vs 68 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Falken Eurowinter HS01 scores 77 vs 70 on dry.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Falken Eurowinter HS01 scores 75 vs 72 on comfort.

Tire A · Falken Eurowinter HS01
Tire B · Hankook Icebear W440

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Eurowinter HS01 or Icebear W440?

Which is better in the wet, Eurowinter HS01 or Icebear W440?

Falken Eurowinter HS01, 86 vs 76 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Eurowinter HS01 or Icebear W440?

Falken Eurowinter HS01, 77 vs 70 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, Eurowinter HS01 or Icebear W440?

Falken Eurowinter HS01, 75 vs 72 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Eurowinter HS01 or Icebear W440?

Falken Eurowinter HS01, 76 vs 68 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology